- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] Digital Ocean
by John Stoffel April 20, 2018

April 20, 2018

I've got my mail hosted on a Digital Ocean droplet and I'm very happy. For approx $72 a year I get a full Linux system with 1gb of RAM and 20gb of SSD storage. Plenty for a mail/web hosting setup for a small family site. Tim> One of the podcasts I listen to "Linux Unplugged" has a promo for "Digital Tim> Ocean" that gets you a $10 credit to go screw around with stuff Tim> I just spun up a CentOS box and I've been poking around. It looks like it's Tim> QEMU/KVM on the insides... Tim> Later, Tim> Tim. Tim> -- Tim> I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their Tim> constituents as "consumers". Tim> _______________________________________________ Tim> Wlug mailing list Tim> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Tim> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

1 0

Digital Ocean
by Tim Keller April 20, 2018

April 20, 2018

Hey Guys, One of the podcasts I listen to "Linux Unplugged" has a promo for "Digital Ocean" that gets you a $10 credit to go screw around with stuff I just spun up a CentOS box and I've been poking around. It looks like it's QEMU/KVM on the insides... Later, Tim. -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

1 0

Great meeting last night!
by Tim Keller April 13, 2018

April 13, 2018

Hey Everybody, Last night's meeting was fantastic! It's always great to get a full house! For those of you who were unable to make it, there were a number of fantastic mini talks. Login gave a great 15 minute rundown regarding the "audit2allow" tool to generate selinux rules. Login then proceeded to show how SElinux is running in lots of places... and then SSH'd into his phone to show that it was also run SElinux. kudos on the sshing over bluetooth from your laptop... that was cool. Greg then gave a great demo on a very lightweight security oriented linux called "Heads" (as opposed to the more well known "Tails" distribution. What was more amazing was that he was running it on a pretty old laptop and it was zippy... Though their support for mirroring displays could be a bit clearer! It was really impressive what you can do with a two core pentium laptop and a usb stick! Lastly, Chuck showed off Qubes. While the install didn't finish until we'd come back from dinner! Chuck was able to talk about the idea of separating applications into different Xen domains. It was really cool. Though we talked about this at and after dinner... I'm fearful that Xen is going the way of the dodo... I wonder if in the future the Qubes people will support other hypervisors. Thank to Login, Greg and Chuck for presenting and thanks to everybody for turning it into a lively and interesting round table discussion. Later, Tim. -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

1 0

Re: [Wlug] WLUG Meeting Tomorrow! Topic: Security Oriented Linux
by Tim Keller April 12, 2018

April 12, 2018

That would be awesome! On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Chuck Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> wrote: > I can try to get Qubes working again on my laptop. I kinda doubt it would > work as a VM since it is based on Xen VMs itself. > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:10:28AM +0000, Tim Keller wrote: > > Hey Gang, > > > > Our next meeting will be April 12th, 2018. > > > > Time: 7pm > > Location: WPI Mid Century Room rm 331 > > > > The topic of this meeting will be Security Oriented Linux(s). In short > > these are versions of linux that attempt to harden your machine through > > encryption, process isolation, etc. and obscure your access to the > internet > > using proxies and tor. > > > > This will include Tails, Kali, Whonix, Qubes, etc. > > If you are using one of the above, drop me a quick line. > > > > Otherwise, I'll be running a few of these as VMs on my machine. > > > > Snacks and refreshments will be provided and afterwards we'll head off > for > > dinner and keep the conversation going. > > > > Thanks, > > Tim. > > > > -- > > I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their > > constituents as "consumers". > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wlug mailing list > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > -- > - Chuck (0 Days until IPv4 depletion: http://ipv4depletion.com/) > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

1 0

Re: [Wlug] WLUG Meeting Tomorrow! Topic: Security Oriented Linux
by Chuck Anderson April 12, 2018

April 12, 2018

I can try to get Qubes working again on my laptop. I kinda doubt it would work as a VM since it is based on Xen VMs itself. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:10:28AM +0000, Tim Keller wrote: > Hey Gang, > > Our next meeting will be April 12th, 2018. > > Time: 7pm > Location: WPI Mid Century Room rm 331 > > The topic of this meeting will be Security Oriented Linux(s). In short > these are versions of linux that attempt to harden your machine through > encryption, process isolation, etc. and obscure your access to the internet > using proxies and tor. > > This will include Tails, Kali, Whonix, Qubes, etc. > If you are using one of the above, drop me a quick line. > > Otherwise, I'll be running a few of these as VMs on my machine. > > Snacks and refreshments will be provided and afterwards we'll head off for > dinner and keep the conversation going. > > Thanks, > Tim. > > -- > I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their > constituents as "consumers". > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug -- - Chuck (0 Days until IPv4 depletion: http://ipv4depletion.com/)

1 0

WLUG Meeting Tomorrow! Topic: Security Oriented Linux
by Tim Keller April 12, 2018

April 12, 2018

Hey Gang, Our next meeting will be April 12th, 2018. Time: 7pm Location: WPI Mid Century Room rm 331 The topic of this meeting will be Security Oriented Linux(s). In short these are versions of linux that attempt to harden your machine through encryption, process isolation, etc. and obscure your access to the internet using proxies and tor. This will include Tails, Kali, Whonix, Qubes, etc. If you are using one of the above, drop me a quick line. Otherwise, I'll be running a few of these as VMs on my machine. Snacks and refreshments will be provided and afterwards we'll head off for dinner and keep the conversation going. Thanks, Tim. -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Human Machine Interface
by Richard Klein April 6, 2018

April 6, 2018

Yes, Keith, you're interesting! On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: > Richard Klein <rich(a)richardklein.org> writes: > > > If anyone has experience writing HMI software, > > I hear my employer needs someone. > > This your lucky day! I wrote some of that years ago; > here it is: > > ;;; Copyright Keith Wright (2018) > ;;; This is Free Software. Licence GPL v2 or later. > > (define (HMI) (display "prompt>") (read)) > > > I think we're looking for an EE, too. > > I have a roll of CAT-5 and a crimper tool. > > > Let me know if you're interested. > > Let me know if I'm interesting. > > -- Keith > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Human Machine Interface
by Keith Wright April 6, 2018

April 6, 2018

Richard Klein <rich(a)richardklein.org> writes: > If anyone has experience writing HMI software, > I hear my employer needs someone. This your lucky day! I wrote some of that years ago; here it is: ;;; Copyright Keith Wright (2018) ;;; This is Free Software. Licence GPL v2 or later. (define (HMI) (display "prompt>") (read)) > I think we're looking for an EE, too. I have a roll of CAT-5 and a crimper tool. > Let me know if you're interested. Let me know if I'm interesting. -- Keith

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Meeting April 12th, 2018 Topic: Security oriented Linux distributions.
by Richard Klein April 6, 2018

April 6, 2018

I was starting to plan to bring my tower with Kali and was wondering if a monitor would be available, but then i remembered I'd have to haul it up from the parking area. It's an old Dell Precision; it's pretty heavy. A VM sounds good to me! On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 9:06 PM Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Gang, > > Our next meeting will be April 12th, 2018. > > Time: 7pm > Location: WPI Mid Century Room rm 331 > > The topic of this meeting will be Security Oriented Linux(s). In short > these are versions of linux that attempt to harden your machine through > encryption, process isolation, etc. and obscure your access to the internet > using proxies and tor. > > This will include Tails, Kali, Whonix, Qubes, etc. > If you are using one of the above, drop me a quick line. > > Otherwise, I'll be running all of these as VMs on my machine. > > Snacks and refreshments will be provided and afterwards we'll head off for > dinner and keep the conversation going. > > Thanks, > Tim. > > > > -- > I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their > constituents as "consumers". > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

1 0

Human Machine Interface
by Richard Klein April 6, 2018

April 6, 2018

If anyone has experience writing HMI software, I hear my employer needs someone. I think we're looking for an EE, too. Let me know if you're interested. -- Rich

1 0

Meeting April 12th, 2018 Topic: Security oriented Linux distributions.
by Tim Keller April 6, 2018

April 6, 2018

Hey Gang, Our next meeting will be April 12th, 2018. Time: 7pm Location: WPI Mid Century Room rm 331 The topic of this meeting will be Security Oriented Linux(s). In short these are versions of linux that attempt to harden your machine through encryption, process isolation, etc. and obscure your access to the internet using proxies and tor. This will include Tails, Kali, Whonix, Qubes, etc. If you are using one of the above, drop me a quick line. Otherwise, I'll be running all of these as VMs on my machine. Snacks and refreshments will be provided and afterwards we'll head off for dinner and keep the conversation going. Thanks, Tim. -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Resurrecting old computers with Linux...
by Chuck Anderson April 1, 2018

April 1, 2018

I wonder if Sparkler Filters is still using their IBM 402 which they were still using as of 2012: https://www.pcworld.com/article/249951/computers/if-it-aint-broke-dont-fix-… They seem to be in business still: http://www.sparkler.com/ On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 09:42:37PM -0400, Jon "maddog" Hall wrote: > John, > > If I remember correctly, the equivalent of "assembly language" for the 1401 > (either the IBM model or the IMB model) was "Autocoder". > > The IBM 1401 was introduced about 1961. By the time I started work at > Aetna Life and Casualty in 1973, we had become the "Largest commercial user > of IBM Equipment in the Free World". That means that maybe the government > used more IBM computers, or that the Russians or the Chinese were using > more IBM computers, but other than that AETNA WAS THE LARGEST. We > AUTOMATICALLY ordered two of anything IBM announced. No sales person had > to call us. IBM announced it: Aetna ordered two. > > So by that time we had lots of IBM 1401s and lots of Autocoder programmers. > > Then the IBM 360 line came out, and with it IBM's line of batch operating > systems: MFT, MVT, VS-1, VS-2, and (finally) MVS. Unfortunately getting > jobs into and out of these batch systems was extraordinarily painful until > the Houston Automatic Spooling Priority (HASP) system (developed at the IBM > Federal Systems Division of the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Flight Center in > Houston, Texas) came out and made life bearable for the operators of the > machines. [Editorial Side Note: These were not "Network Administrators", > nor "Systems Administrators"....these were OPERATORS! As in BOFH! Never > forget that! And for heaven sake RTFM!] > > With those also arrived a time-sharing system called CP-67 along with a > small "Cambridge Monitor System" (CMS), needed because CP-67 was a Virtual > Machine. > > Yes, a Virtual Machine in 1973! Which eventually was renamed to "VM/CMS" > and "CMS" became the "Conversational Monitor System".....but I digress.... > > Aetna had a LOT of machines, and a LOT of Autocoder programs, and a LOT of > Autocoder programmers, which they tried to convert to COBOL. > > Yes, COBOL, that wondrous language developed by the team headed up by my > personal hero, Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper! > > After several years most of the programmers were happily writing COBOL > (yes, I know that seems hard to believe, but they were) except for a few > Autocoder programmers left to make bug fixes and extensions to existing > Autocoder programs. Of course new programs and new systems were written > in COBOL, because why would you write anything new in Autocoder. > > As the 1401s were replaced by 360s and (later) 370 machines, IBM created an > emulator for Autocoder that operated in a 360/370 system, so you could run > Autocoder programs binary compatible on your 370/370 mainframe. And when > you did you almost heard the IBM choking. > > I never coded in Autocoder, but I did hear one story about an instruction > that "rotated all of memory under the accumulator", and it was said that > when that instruction (which executed gracefully on a real IBM 1401) hit > the emulator on the 360/370, you could hear the machine hemorrhaging..... > > Over time the Autocoder programmers became gloomy. They were tired of > patching old programs, and not working on any of the new, exciting systems > that Aetna was writing. Aetna had written its own real-time transaction > processing system called SAFARI (sorry Apple, we were first) and later on a > Group Claim Payment System (ACCLAIMS), which gained a lot of people glory. > > Autocoder patching did not get much glory. And over time there was less > and less work...the writing was on the wall. > > One day I came into work and found the Autocoder programmers very excited > and happy. They were given NEW programs to write! "I did not know you > guys had learned COBOL!" I exclaimed. > > "Oh, we have not learned COBOL. They are allowing us to write the new > programs in Autocoder." > > In the late 1990s there was this panic to find old COBOL programmers who > could fix potential problems with Y2K problems. I am sure that Aetna had > to bring a few Autocoder programmers back from the dead. > > And now you know THE REST OF THE STORY. > > Warmest regards, > > maddog > > > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 8:39 PM, John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org> wrote: > > > > > *ppppbbbbbbttttttt!* > > > > Jon> I never worked on an "IMB 1401". Was that anything like the IBM 1401? > > > > Jon> (ducks) > > > > Ken Shirriff is the guy behind righto.com, really interesting stuff he > > writes about. Sometimes I wish I was that smart and motivated. But > > writing is hard for me... as Maddog showed. > > > > *grin* > > > > Jon> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 19:16 John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> "Jon" == Jon \"maddog\" Hall <jon.maddog.hall(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > > >>> The trouble with the old machines is the > > >>> eventual death of irreplacable hardware -- Pentium-MMX CPU Fans, PATA > > >>> disks and the like. > > > > Jon> Emulators and virtual machines.....allow old copies of the OS to live > > Jon> forever. > > > > Jon> I am, however, waiting for the "virtual car", for the time that > > Jon> people can no longer get the little embedded systems that allow > > Jon> modern-day cars to run. The era of "fixing up an old car" which > > Jon> both trained you in auto mechanics and "gave you wheels" is > > Jon> coming to a close. > > > > Jon> Did you see the new game on early release on Steam? System Build > > Jon> Simulator? Where you get to build a new PC in a simulation? > > Heh... > > > > Jon> Another great resource is this blog, http://righto.com, who > > works on > > Jon> old IMB 1401 systems with card punches, etc. Lots of great info > > Jon> there. > > > > Jon> John

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Resurrecting old computers with Linux...
by Jon "maddog" Hall April 1, 2018

April 1, 2018

John, If I remember correctly, the equivalent of "assembly language" for the 1401 (either the IBM model or the IMB model) was "Autocoder". The IBM 1401 was introduced about 1961. By the time I started work at Aetna Life and Casualty in 1973, we had become the "Largest commercial user of IBM Equipment in the Free World". That means that maybe the government used more IBM computers, or that the Russians or the Chinese were using more IBM computers, but other than that AETNA WAS THE LARGEST. We AUTOMATICALLY ordered two of anything IBM announced. No sales person had to call us. IBM announced it: Aetna ordered two. So by that time we had lots of IBM 1401s and lots of Autocoder programmers. Then the IBM 360 line came out, and with it IBM's line of batch operating systems: MFT, MVT, VS-1, VS-2, and (finally) MVS. Unfortunately getting jobs into and out of these batch systems was extraordinarily painful until the Houston Automatic Spooling Priority (HASP) system (developed at the IBM Federal Systems Division of the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Flight Center in Houston, Texas) came out and made life bearable for the operators of the machines. [Editorial Side Note: These were not "Network Administrators", nor "Systems Administrators"....these were OPERATORS! As in BOFH! Never forget that! And for heaven sake RTFM!] With those also arrived a time-sharing system called CP-67 along with a small "Cambridge Monitor System" (CMS), needed because CP-67 was a Virtual Machine. Yes, a Virtual Machine in 1973! Which eventually was renamed to "VM/CMS" and "CMS" became the "Conversational Monitor System".....but I digress.... Aetna had a LOT of machines, and a LOT of Autocoder programs, and a LOT of Autocoder programmers, which they tried to convert to COBOL. Yes, COBOL, that wondrous language developed by the team headed up by my personal hero, Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper! After several years most of the programmers were happily writing COBOL (yes, I know that seems hard to believe, but they were) except for a few Autocoder programmers left to make bug fixes and extensions to existing Autocoder programs. Of course new programs and new systems were written in COBOL, because why would you write anything new in Autocoder. As the 1401s were replaced by 360s and (later) 370 machines, IBM created an emulator for Autocoder that operated in a 360/370 system, so you could run Autocoder programs binary compatible on your 370/370 mainframe. And when you did you almost heard the IBM choking. I never coded in Autocoder, but I did hear one story about an instruction that "rotated all of memory under the accumulator", and it was said that when that instruction (which executed gracefully on a real IBM 1401) hit the emulator on the 360/370, you could hear the machine hemorrhaging..... Over time the Autocoder programmers became gloomy. They were tired of patching old programs, and not working on any of the new, exciting systems that Aetna was writing. Aetna had written its own real-time transaction processing system called SAFARI (sorry Apple, we were first) and later on a Group Claim Payment System (ACCLAIMS), which gained a lot of people glory. Autocoder patching did not get much glory. And over time there was less and less work...the writing was on the wall. One day I came into work and found the Autocoder programmers very excited and happy. They were given NEW programs to write! "I did not know you guys had learned COBOL!" I exclaimed. "Oh, we have not learned COBOL. They are allowing us to write the new programs in Autocoder." In the late 1990s there was this panic to find old COBOL programmers who could fix potential problems with Y2K problems. I am sure that Aetna had to bring a few Autocoder programmers back from the dead. And now you know THE REST OF THE STORY. Warmest regards, maddog On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 8:39 PM, John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org> wrote: > > *ppppbbbbbbttttttt!* > > Jon> I never worked on an "IMB 1401". Was that anything like the IBM 1401? > > Jon> (ducks) > > Ken Shirriff is the guy behind righto.com, really interesting stuff he > writes about. Sometimes I wish I was that smart and motivated. But > writing is hard for me... as Maddog showed. > > *grin* > > Jon> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 19:16 John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org> wrote: > > >>>>>> "Jon" == Jon \"maddog\" Hall <jon.maddog.hall(a)gmail.com> writes: > > >>> The trouble with the old machines is the > >>> eventual death of irreplacable hardware -- Pentium-MMX CPU Fans, PATA > >>> disks and the like. > > Jon> Emulators and virtual machines.....allow old copies of the OS to live > Jon> forever. > > Jon> I am, however, waiting for the "virtual car", for the time that > Jon> people can no longer get the little embedded systems that allow > Jon> modern-day cars to run. The era of "fixing up an old car" which > Jon> both trained you in auto mechanics and "gave you wheels" is > Jon> coming to a close. > > Jon> Did you see the new game on early release on Steam? System Build > Jon> Simulator? Where you get to build a new PC in a simulation? > Heh... > > Jon> Another great resource is this blog, http://righto.com, who > works on > Jon> old IMB 1401 systems with card punches, etc. Lots of great info > Jon> there. > > Jon> John > > Jon> _______________________________________________ > Jon> Wlug mailing list > Jon> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > Jon> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > Jon> _______________________________________________ > Jon> Wlug mailing list > Jon> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > Jon> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Resurrecting old computers with Linux...
by John Stoffel April 1, 2018

April 1, 2018

*ppppbbbbbbttttttt!* Jon> I never worked on an "IMB 1401". Was that anything like the IBM 1401? Jon> (ducks) Ken Shirriff is the guy behind righto.com, really interesting stuff he writes about. Sometimes I wish I was that smart and motivated. But writing is hard for me... as Maddog showed. *grin* Jon> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 19:16 John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org> wrote: >>>>>> "Jon" == Jon \"maddog\" Hall <jon.maddog.hall(a)gmail.com> writes: >>> The trouble with the old machines is the >>> eventual death of irreplacable hardware -- Pentium-MMX CPU Fans, PATA >>> disks and the like. Jon> Emulators and virtual machines.....allow old copies of the OS to live Jon> forever. Jon> I am, however, waiting for the "virtual car", for the time that Jon> people can no longer get the little embedded systems that allow Jon> modern-day cars to run. The era of "fixing up an old car" which Jon> both trained you in auto mechanics and "gave you wheels" is Jon> coming to a close. Jon> Did you see the new game on early release on Steam? System Build Jon> Simulator? Where you get to build a new PC in a simulation? Heh... Jon> Another great resource is this blog, http://righto.com, who works on Jon> old IMB 1401 systems with card punches, etc. Lots of great info Jon> there. Jon> John Jon> _______________________________________________ Jon> Wlug mailing list Jon> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Jon> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug Jon> _______________________________________________ Jon> Wlug mailing list Jon> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Jon> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Resurrecting old computers with Linux...
by Jon "maddog" Hall April 1, 2018

April 1, 2018

John, I never worked on an "IMB 1401". Was that anything like the IBM 1401? (ducks) Jon On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 19:16 John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org> wrote: > >>>>> "Jon" == Jon \"maddog\" Hall <jon.maddog.hall(a)gmail.com> writes: > > >> The trouble with the old machines is the > >> eventual death of irreplacable hardware -- Pentium-MMX CPU Fans, PATA > >> disks and the like. > > Jon> Emulators and virtual machines.....allow old copies of the OS to live > forever. > > Jon> I am, however, waiting for the "virtual car", for the time that > Jon> people can no longer get the little embedded systems that allow > Jon> modern-day cars to run. The era of "fixing up an old car" which > Jon> both trained you in auto mechanics and "gave you wheels" is > Jon> coming to a close. > > Did you see the new game on early release on Steam? System Build > Simulator? Where you get to build a new PC in a simulation? Heh... > > Another great resource is this blog, http://righto.com, who works on > old IMB 1401 systems with card punches, etc. Lots of great info > there. > > John > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Resurrecting old computers with Linux...
by John Stoffel March 31, 2018

March 31, 2018

>>>>> "Jon" == Jon \"maddog\" Hall <jon.maddog.hall(a)gmail.com> writes: >> The trouble with the old machines is the >> eventual death of irreplacable hardware -- Pentium-MMX CPU Fans, PATA >> disks and the like. Jon> Emulators and virtual machines.....allow old copies of the OS to live forever. Jon> I am, however, waiting for the "virtual car", for the time that Jon> people can no longer get the little embedded systems that allow Jon> modern-day cars to run. The era of "fixing up an old car" which Jon> both trained you in auto mechanics and "gave you wheels" is Jon> coming to a close. Did you see the new game on early release on Steam? System Build Simulator? Where you get to build a new PC in a simulation? Heh... Another great resource is this blog, http://righto.com, who works on old IMB 1401 systems with card punches, etc. Lots of great info there. John

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Resurrecting old computers with Linux...
by Jon "maddog" Hall March 31, 2018

March 31, 2018

>The trouble with the old machines is the >eventual death of irreplacable hardware -- Pentium-MMX CPU Fans, PATA >disks and the like. Emulators and virtual machines.....allow old copies of the OS to live forever. I am, however, waiting for the "virtual car", for the time that people can no longer get the little embedded systems that allow modern-day cars to run. The era of "fixing up an old car" which both trained you in auto mechanics and "gave you wheels" is coming to a close. md On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Michael Voorhis <mvoorhis(a)cs.wpi.edu> wrote: > On 03/30/2018 10:43 PM, Robert Schwein wrote: > > http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/apps/linux-puppy-der- > turbo-fuer-uralt-computer-a-1194437.html> Interesting use of Linux. > > Any OS that can be used with embedded systems will work well on > mid-to-late 1990s PCs. The trouble with the old machines is the > eventual death of irreplacable hardware -- Pentium-MMX CPU Fans, PATA > disks and the like. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > >

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Resurrecting old computers with Linux...
by Michael Voorhis March 31, 2018

March 31, 2018

On 03/30/2018 10:43 PM, Robert Schwein wrote: > http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/apps/linux-puppy-der-turbo-fuer-uralt-comput…> Interesting use of Linux. Any OS that can be used with embedded systems will work well on mid-to-late 1990s PCs. The trouble with the old machines is the eventual death of irreplacable hardware -- Pentium-MMX CPU Fans, PATA disks and the like.

1 0

Resurrecting old computers with Linux...
by Robert Schwein March 31, 2018

March 31, 2018

http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/apps/linux-puppy-der-turbo-fuer-uralt-comput… Interesting use of Linux. Bob

1 0

Next WLUG meeting! April 12th, 2018! Location: WPI Student Center, Rm 331. Topic: Secure Linux Distributions
by Tim Keller March 29, 2018

March 29, 2018

Hey Gang, Our next meeting is April 12th, 2018! Would people be interested in talking about security oriented versions of Linux? We all know about Tails, and in consideration of the issues that Richard ran into with getting stuff installed on Kali, it might be interesting to compare / contrast the different options out there. What do people think? I'm thinking this would work best as having a couple of people each showing off a particular distribution. Thanks, Tim. -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

1 0

Re: [Wlug] RFID reader/writer
by Dennis Payne March 28, 2018

March 28, 2018

On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 21:47 -0400, John Stoffel wrote: > Adafruit.com has some stuff like this for sale. They're not always > the cheapest, but they have great tutorials and example code. Found a LWN article on NFC: https://lwn.net/Articles/645843/ He used a "PN532 NFC/RFID controller breakout board" and "FTDI Serial TTL-232 USB Cable" to connect via USB. It is supported by libnfc. His article talks about the Linux NFC being a better design and the future of NFC for linux. I haven't looked to see if it has progressed enough since his article to replace libnfc. > Looks like a good start. Probably cost you about $50 total to get > started, if you dont' have a raspberry Pi kicking around. (Still haven't got a raspberry Pi. I consider myself a software guy and not as interested in "raw" hardware. I got the PocketCHIP from kickstarter because it was a finished product. However I seem to be descending into hardware. I purchased TinyCircuit's TinyScreen Video Game Kit and they sent me a TinyArcade to port my Pac-Man clone to.) > This could be a really fun thing for the cubs to do! Especially if > you could then sign their figures so that when they hit the reader, > it knows it's them. Or something like that. Ask the kids for ideas! Definitely plan to ask the kids for ideas. Just plan to test enough that I feel confident it is doable before asking them. Yesterday I took pictures of Skylanders to see at what scale they still look good. At 64 pixels wide they are a little grainy. 128 pixels wide looks pretty good. Skylanders apparently has catch phrases for characters so I would like to get each kid to record a catch phrase for their character.

1 0

Re: [Wlug] RFID reader/writer
by John Stoffel March 27, 2018

March 27, 2018

Dennis> Does anyone have a recommendation for a RFID reader/writer for Dennis> Linux (and Windows if possible)? I'm looking for a relatively Dennis> inexpensive solution. Adafruit.com has some stuff like this for sale. They're not always the cheapest, but they have great tutorials and example code. https://learn.adafruit.com/adafruit-nfc-rfid-on-raspberry-pi/overview?gclid… Looks like a good start. Probably cost you about $50 total to get started, if you dont' have a raspberry Pi kicking around. Dennis> My kids just got Skylanders Imaginators. I found some code to Dennis> read the characters. I started thinking about the Game Design Dennis> merit badge for Cub Scout Webelos. I'm wondering about the Dennis> viability of building a "portal" device and having the kids Dennis> make clay figures with rfids inside the base. Obviously the Dennis> game would be as complex as Skylanders. I'm thinking 2D using Dennis> pictures of the models. This could be a really fun thing for the cubs to do! Especially if you could then sign their figures so that when they hit the reader, it knows it's them. Or something like that. Ask the kids for ideas!

1 0

RFID reader/writer
by Dennis Payne March 27, 2018

March 27, 2018

Does anyone have a recommendation for a RFID reader/writer for Linux (and Windows if possible)? I'm looking for a relatively inexpensive solution. My kids just got Skylanders Imaginators. I found some code to read the characters. I started thinking about the Game Design merit badge for Cub Scout Webelos. I'm wondering about the viability of building a "portal" device and having the kids make clay figures with rfids inside the base. Obviously the game would be as complex as Skylanders. I'm thinking 2D using pictures of the models.

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Kali Linux/GDM3 display manager
by Richard Klein March 26, 2018

March 26, 2018

I'll try that Xorg.wrap work-around, in any case. On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Krichevsky, Nicholas Jacob < njkrichevsky(a)wpi.edu> wrote: > o_O I don't know enough about how X interacts with the hardware, but not > being able to open the frame buffer doesn't sound good... Take a look at > this. <https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/149987/233297> >

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Kali Linux/GDM3 display manager
by Richard Klein March 26, 2018

March 26, 2018

I'm pretty sure it does manage to open the framebuffer; I get the mouse cursor at what looks to be the monitor's native resolution. It probably throws that error before it tries a different method, but obviously I don't know. On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Krichevsky, Nicholas Jacob < njkrichevsky(a)wpi.edu> wrote: > o_O I don't know enough about how X interacts with the hardware, but not > being able to open the frame buffer doesn't sound good... Take a look at > this. <https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/149987/233297> > ------------------------------ > *From:* wlug-bounces(a)mail.wlug.org <wlug-bounces(a)mail.wlug.org> on behalf > of Richard Klein <rich(a)richardklein.org> > *Sent:* Sunday, March 25, 2018 7:14:35 PM > *To:* Worcester Linux Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [Wlug] Kali Linux/GDM3 display manager > > Creating a new user didn't clear anything up. I was able to log into the > GUI session with the new user, but, again, there was nothing there but a > solid background and the mouse cursor. > > I didn't find .xsession-errors or .gconf in my home directories (for my > existing account nor for the new account), but I did find > $home/.local/share/xorg/Xorg.1.log. There were a couple warnings for > fonts it couldn't find and drivers it couldn't use, but in all cases it was > able to fall back to something else. There was one error: > (EE) open /dev/fb0: permission denied > That was it. > > -- > Rich > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Bradley Noyes <bkn(a)ithryn.net> wrote: > > Richard, > > I’d bet that your packages are fine (but i’m not a betting man). It sounds > too me like there is something awry w/ your X environment. Perhaps the > upgraded packages don’t recognize a config buried somewhere. Here’s a > couple things i would try. > > - Often times there a file in your home directory called > .xsession-errors. I’d see if that file exists, and it may offer you some > hints as to why your window manager is not starting. I recall launching X > from a Graphical Login Window to be finicky in linux and error output is > difficult to understand. the .xsession-errors file is where i’d look first. > > - Other idea is to create a new user, then login to the GUI with that > user to make sure the GUI starts from a fresh environment. > > - The last idea i have. It sounds like you’re running gnome from the fact > that your using GDM3, I believe the gnome environment files are in .gconf > in your home directory. try renaming your .gconf to something like > .gconf.backup. You may also want to try the same for .local, although many > other applications beyond gnome apps use .local for environment settings. > > > - b > > > > On Mar 18, 2018, at 11:13, Richard Klein <rich(a)richardklein.org> wrote: > > > > I'm running Kali, which is based on Debian. Recently, after some > updates, the computer would only boot to a text prompt; no GUI. I found > that, somehow, I had a more recent version of a Gstreamer-plugins library > than GDM3 could run on. I removed the library, then re-installed GDM3, > letting it choose whatever libraries it depended on. That worked, to a > point. It boots to the GUI now, and gives me a login prompt. I enter my > username and password successfully, but then I get a solid-color > background, a mouse cursor, and nothing else; no icons, no status bars, no > menus, no apparent response to mouse clicks. > > > > My guess is I still need to re-install something else that runs on top > of the display manager, but I don't know what. Any ideas? > > _______________________________________________ > > Wlug mailing list > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > >

1 0