word perfect
by donald vitkus
can not install word perfect 8.0 on united linux
any ideas
15 years, 11 months
spam with header
by Gregory Avedissian
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Return-Path: wlug-admin(a)mail.wlug.org
Received: from paramount.ind.wpi.edu (root(a)paramount.ind.WPI.EDU
[130.215.24.199]) by acestes-fe0.ultra.net (8.8.8/ult/n26500/mtc.v2) with
ESMTP id HAA01415; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 07:06:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from paramount.ind.WPI.EDU (IDENT:mailman@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by paramount.ind.wpi.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5UB1Tn02769;
Sun, 30 Jun 2002 07:01:29 -0400
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root(a)smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
by paramount.ind.wpi.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5UB0En02743
for <wlug(a)mail.wlug.org>; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 07:00:14 -0400
Received: from chat.ru ([194.143.190.11])
by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g5UB46wx028128
for <wlug(a)mail.wlug.org>; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 07:04:07 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200206301104.g5UB46wx028128(a)smtp.WPI.EDU>
From: "Arcady 28412" <MAILER-DAEMON8898(a)chat.ru>
To: <wlug(a)mail.wlug.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.54d)
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 15:06:57 +0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="ISO-8859-2"
X-UIDL: ae92ef1fea768b8ce77d61b44fbde8c9
Status: R
X-Status: N
X-Warning: zoxjCpdlo1zoxj1ruj@30577
Subject: [Wlug] Real ZOO web site, welcome! <zoxjCpdlo1zoxj1ruj>
Sender: wlug-admin(a)mail.wlug.org
Errors-To: wlug-admin(a)mail.wlug.org
X-BeenThere: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org
List-Id: Worcester Linux Users Group <wlug.mail.wlug.org>
<html>
<!--12405-->
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
I got your email from ICQ, may be it will be interested?<br>
The BEST zoo site on the @net! <br>
<!--14853-->
Sex With Dogs<br>
Horse Blow Jobs.<br>
<!--16187-->
Snake Fuck.<br>
<a href="http://rol.rape-sexy.com/?refid=zoxjCpdlo1zoxj1ruj">REAL ANIMAL
FUCKING!</a><br>
<b>100% HARDCORE!<br>
<!--28424-->
<a
href="http://rol.rape-sexy.com/?refid=zoxjCpdlo1zoxj1ruj">rol.rape-sexy.com</a><br>
<hr>
<i><a
href="http://rol.rape-sexy.com/unsub.cgi?em=wlug@mail.wlug.org">unsub</a></i><br>
Good luck.<br><br>
<!--16071-->
</body></html>
_______________________________________________
Wlug mailing list
Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org
http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug
<html>
<!--12405-->
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
I got your email from ICQ, may be it will be interested?<br>
The BEST zoo site on the @net! <br>
<!--14853-->
Sex With Dogs<br>
Horse Blow Jobs.<br>
<!--16187-->
Snake Fuck.<br>
<a href="http://rol.rape-sexy.com/?refid=zoxjCpdlo1zoxj1ruj">REAL ANIMAL
FUCKING!</a><br> <b>100% HARDCORE!<br>
<!--28424-->
<a
href="http://rol.rape-sexy.com/?refid=zoxjCpdlo1zoxj1ruj">rol.rape-sexy.com<
/a><br> <hr>
<i><a
href="http://rol.rape-sexy.com/unsub.cgi?em=wlug@mail.wlug.org">unsub</a></i
><br> Good luck.<br><br>
<!--16071-->
</body></html>
_______________________________________________
Wlug mailing list
Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org
http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug
-------------------------------------------------------
16 years, 10 months
spam attack
by avedis＠ma.ultranet.com
I just received some porn spam that has wlug address as the return
address. Should I just ignore and delete, forward to spamcop, or does
someone here want to deal with the spammer personally? Looks like it
came from 194.143.190.11. This shit should be illegal.
Awaiting further instructions...
Greg
16 years, 10 months
What are Lindows and Lycoris?
by Andy Stewart
HI all,
Walmart is selling ultra-cheap PCs with Lindows on them (the PC is by
Microtel). The screen shots look alot like KDE. Lindows makes software
available for download on their website (the apps, not the OS) for a fee.
I've also seen Lycoris, and on their website, they make passing references to
Redmond Linux.
So, I ask the question, are these just some version of Linux "packaged for the
masses"? If not, what are they? Are there other similar products besides
Lindows and Lycoris?
Thanks,
Andy
--
Andy Stewart, Founder
Worcester Linux Users' Group
Worcester, MA USA
http://www.wlug.org
16 years, 10 months
Lilo :-)
by doug waud
Hi all
On the TV lately I have heard a lot about Lilo. It
seems to be in the context of something called Stitch.
I am not clear on the details but Stitch apparently is
some sort of extraterrestial with a bent to destroying
everything it encounters. I assume the reference is,
therefore, to Microsoft.
The interesting thing about Lilo is that it never seems
to be spelled LILO. The first letter is captialized so
I assume there is some degree of case sensitivity involved.
If any of you can decipher what all of this means perhaps
you could fill me in! :-)
I do notice that Disney seems to be involved so it would
seem that Pixar is not the only place Linux seems to
be making inroads.
doug
16 years, 10 months
RE: [Wlug] Installing Redhat on HP machines
by Hemstreet, Jeffrey
Thank you all for your help.... just wanted to let you know the outcome
of the installs...
On the HP Vectra, there appears to be some hardware issues, as Windows 2K
boot floppy fails with a Boot I/O Error. This machine has been suspect,
and I will probably scavenge it for parts (CD, Memory) (It has had some
intermittent problems finding the HDD.)
On the HP Kayak..... it's UP! I downloaded the new boot disk image from
the email below, and the install ran without a hitch. It must not like the
7.2 standard boot image since it failed both from the install disk and
from the boot floppy I made straight from the CDROM. (This was a CD burned
from the WLUG installfest in February and it has installed faithfully on
about a dozen machines.)
Thank you again.
jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles R. Anderson [mailto:cra@WPI.EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 7:49 PM
To: 'wlug(a)mail.wlug.org'
Subject: Re: [Wlug] Installing Redhat on HP machines
Have you tried booting the latest errata install disks? You can get
them here:
ftp://angus.ind.wpi.edu/pub/updates/7.2/en/os/images/i386/boot.img
ftp://angus.ind.wpi.edu/pub/updates/7.2/en/os/images/i386/update-disk-200201
17.img
Make sure you rawrite/dd them to brand new floppy disks, since if there
is even a single byte error on the floppy disk, the install will fail.
Boot the first one (boot.img) and see below...
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 06:25:44PM -0400, Hemstreet, Jeffrey wrote:
jhemstreet> One is an HP Vectra (2Gb IDE, 56MB, P200). I can fdisk and
select
jhemstreet> packages, but when it goes to
jhemstreet> format the disk to install the packages, I get a signal 11 fatal
error. I
jhemstreet> think there may be something
jhemstreet> flaky with this system (HDD or memory problem?) Just wondering
if anyone
jhemstreet> else has seen this type
jhemstreet> of failure and could give me any more insight. I plan on
replacing the HDD
jhemstreet> to see if that is the problem.
It depends. Does the signal 11 always happen at exactly the same point?
If so, that doesn't necessarily point to flakey hardware, but rather a
software bug. If it IS random, then it does sound like a memory error.
You can test your RAM with memtest86, available here:
http://www.memtest86.com/
Another thing you can try is making sure the amount of memory is
detected correctly by Linux (check the boot up messages of the Linux
kernel). If not, you can force the correct amount by appending the mem
option to the linux boot command line:
linux updates mem=56M
You need the "updates" bit to use the update-disk mentioned earlier.
Insert the updates disk when it asks.
jhemstreet> The other is a dual-300 PII HP Kayak with a SCSI Drive. I get a
boot error
jhemstreet> when trying to boot from the
jhemstreet> CDROM or Install Disk. This system is currently running NT 5.
Any ideas
jhemstreet> why the boot would fail?
Bad floppy disk and/or CD-ROM? How did you acquire your Red Hat 7.2
CD-ROM? If it isn't an official disk, then it might have been burned
incorrectly. Red Hat recommends burning ISO's in Disk-At-Once mode, and
checking the images and disks with md5sum to be sure they burned
correctly.
--
Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/
PGP Key ID: 49BB5886
Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886
_______________________________________________
Wlug mailing list
Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org
http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug
16 years, 11 months
Installing Redhat on HP machines
by Hemstreet, Jeffrey
I am having a problem installing Redhat 7.2 on 2 different HP machines. I
thought I might be
able to get some information from the plethera of people who have done
installs. Or any ideas
on what to do next?
One is an HP Vectra (2Gb IDE, 56MB, P200). I can fdisk and select packages,
but when it goes to
format the disk to install the packages, I get a signal 11 fatal error. I
think there may be something
flaky with this system (HDD or memory problem?) Just wondering if anyone
else has seen this type
of failure and could give me any more insight. I plan on replacing the HDD
to see if that is the problem.
The other is a dual-300 PII HP Kayak with a SCSI Drive. I get a boot error
when trying to boot from the
CDROM or Install Disk. This system is currently running NT 5. Any ideas
why the boot would fail?
Thanks,
jeff
16 years, 11 months
RE: [Wlug] Who is port scanning me?
by Simoncini, Matthew
Hi again,
Over the weekend, I received some "creative" feedback and all of it is
appreciated. Why question was intended to find an easy way to track down the
owner of an IP address within our corporate network (unregistered with
DNS/WINS). Not to hack, crack, spam, or DOS them, but to gain information on
that particular node. I have to bring this IP address to the attention of
our Security Team, but wanted more information to give them.
Given all the feedback, it seems easier just to contact the Security Team
and let them figure this out.
Thanks again for your time.
Matthew
-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip G Deneault [mailto:deneault@WPI.EDU]
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 9:27 PM
To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org
Subject: Re: [Wlug] Who is port scanning me?
Chances are the machine that is performing the portscan is hacked himself.
It does no good to "hack them back" because your not hacking the
hackers...your hacking the hack. :-) On top of that, you'll only cloud
the issue and, if the matter is taken to the authorities, you could also
get in trouble.
Not to mention the entire concept of hacking without authorization is
unethical and illegal.
I'm going to go say its not worth it. This does happen constantly if your
connected to the Internet. Your best offense is a good defense.
Phil
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Michael Frysinger wrote:
> try and hack them back????????
> or just move on because it doesnt matter that much.
> in the real world that shit happens all the time
> -mike
>
> On Sunday 23 June 2002 08:42 am, David Goss wrote:
> > and if it is a hacker???... what's the best way to send them back a
little
> > something to let them know you care???
> >
> > dave goss
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "George Metz" <wolfstar(a)shadownet.wox.org>
> > To: <wlug(a)mail.wlug.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 12:49 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Wlug] Who is port scanning me?
> >
> > > On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Simoncini, Matthew wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I'm constantly getting port scanned from a certain IP address on our
> > > > internal corporate network. I'd really like to find out where and
who
> >
> > this
> >
> > > > person is, but don't know much outside of ping, traceroute,
nslookup,
> >
> > etc
> >
> > > > .... I was wondering if anyone knows of any tools that can get me
more
> > > > information on this person? This happens to be on our private
network,
> >
> > so
> >
> > > > most internet tools I don't think will help much.
> > >
> > > If it's on your internal net, then talking to the network admins for
your
> > > site should give you a good idea of where they're at and why they're
> > > doing it.
> > >
> > > If there's no network admin on site, then you'll have to do some
footwork
> > > yourself. The suggestion to use IPTables to ignore data from that
address
> > > is a good one if possible; you might even be able to track down the
> > > culprit when they suddenly can't access your system anymore and ask
why.
> > > (Possible if it's a somehow compromised system on the internal
network.)
> > >
> > > Another possibility is using host or nslookup if you've got internal
> > > nameservers behind whatever's running your NAT setup (I'm making the
> > > assumption that you're running NAT if you're on a private net.)
> > >
> > > If you happen to be the guy who's had Network admin position shoved
upon
> > > you, then you can try getting a null route added to the router for
your
> > > net connection at work and use that to see who complains about a
sudden
> > > lack of net access too, but I'd definitely be careful of that method.
=)
> > >
> > > --
> > > George Metz
> > > Commercial Routing Engineer
> > > wolfstar(a)shadownet.wox.org
> > >
> > > "We know what deterrence was with 'mutually assured destruction'
during
> > > the Cold War. But what is deterrence in information warfare?" --
> > > Brigadier General Douglas Richardson, USAF, Commander - Space Warfare
> > > Center
> > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Phil Deneault "We work in the dark, We do what we can,
deneault(a)wpi.edu We give what we have. Our doubt is our passion,
WPI NetOps and our passion is our task. The rest is the
OpenVMS Guy maddness of art." - Henry James
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________
Wlug mailing list
Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org
http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug
16 years, 11 months
fsck, segmantation fault, etc.
by Baris Hasdemir
Hi,
I bought a new hard drive, Maxtor 7200 RPM, ATA133, 40GB, and began
using it at ATA100.
I formatted my /dev/hda5 with mkfs.ext2 and mounted it under /home. I
have been using this mount with the Slackware 8.0 at /dev/hda6 for
several days without any problems.
Two days ago I installed Slackware8.1 on /dev/hda8 and used the same
device mounted to /home. (/dev/hda5)
Yesterday under root privileges I attempted to delete a user's two big
files, and got the following error (or warning, I don't know):
root@penguen:/home/avci# rm more_than_700MB_files*
EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,5)): ext2_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not
in
datazone - block = 1083636778, count = 1
EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,5)): ext2_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not
in
datazone - block = 1083606420, count = 1
EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,5)): ext2_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not
in
datazone - block = 1083602068, count = 1
EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,5)): ext2_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not
in
datazone - block = 1083602292, count = 1
root@penguen:/home/avci# ls -al
total 24
drwx--x--x 2 avci misafir 4096 Jun 23 12:47 ./
drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096 Feb 25 2001 ../
-rw------- 1 avci misafir 36 Jun 17 17:26 .bash_history
-rw-r--r-- 1 avci misafir 34 Jun 17 16:44 .less
-rw-r--r-- 1 avci misafir 114 Jun 17 16:44 .lessrc
-rw-r--r-- 1 avci misafir 3394 Jun 17 16:44 .screenrc
However, rm deleted the files. But I couldn't understand the warning.
And then, just because of curiosity I tried to copy one of the same big
files from another partition to the same location, and cp gave out
those:
root@penguen:/home/avci# time cp /mnt/hda10/one_of_the_big_files .
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
00000004
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0002
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[<c0128240>] Tainted: P
EFLAGS: 00010046
eax: cbf58000 ebx: 00000003 ecx: ca000000 edx: 00000000
esi: c1405e50 edi: 00000202 ebp: c12f1f80 esp: c14e7efc
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Process kswapd (pid: 4, stackpage=c14e7000)
Stack: ca000240 cbe9b8c0 cbe9bb40 c12f1f80 c0130f12 c1405e50 ca000240
c0132a9c
ca000240 ca000240 c12f1f80 000001d0 00000009 00000200 c013118c
c12f1f80
000001d0 cbe9bb40 c12f1f80 c0128f62 c12f1f80 000001d0 00000020
000001d0
Call Trace: [<c0130f12>] [<c0132a9c>] [<c013118c>] [<c0128f62>]
[<c01291a6>]
[<c012921c>] [<c01292b3>] [<c0129316>] [<c012942d>] [<c0105708>]
Code: 89 42 04 89 10 8b 46 08 89 48 04 89 01 8d 56 08 89 51 04 89
real 0m54.986s
user 0m0.060s
sys 0m7.330s
And then of course I did a couple of fsck on this partition after
unmounting. first one quitted after several error correcting, second
fsck did segmentation fault but the last one did finish fsck. and lots
of error were corrected.
It might give an idea
if I mount it like this
#mount /dev/hda5 /home
file names appear as $@#$#%#$ etc.
but if I mount it like that
#mount /dev/hda5 /home -t ext2
no problem seem to occur.
I am thinking about whether I did something missing at the fdisk stage
or formatting stage. Or is my new hard disk a dead-born? Or any other
things you may notice?
thank you,
baris
16 years, 11 months
