- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

CentOS?
by Pete Wason Sept. 7, 2006

Sept. 7, 2006

Hiall, Anyone working with CentOS? I have a RH8 server that needs to join the party. Any remote possibility that CentOS can upgrade RH8, or do I need to backup everything and start from scratch? Yes, I know it's a wacky question. :) PS: And, DAMN AOL! PPS: if this message is HTML, let me know; I'm still learning Thunderbird... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Pete Wason* Hy Noom Publications /codevark(a)aim.com/ 508.865.5414

6 5

bacula
by Mike Leo Sept. 6, 2006

Sept. 6, 2006

Someone at the cook-out mentioned they were using bacula for backups. I have just installed it and I have a DLT tape drive. I have it confugered OK and i can connect to my fd (client) and my sd (storage device). To keep things simple, lets say that I am doing everything on one server. I can label the tapes and even backup to my "File" device. My question is, what/where do I build a list of jobs to run? Lets say I want a "Full" backup of the system, and a seperate backup of just /home. Where do these jobs get defined, etc etc etc. This seems to be the only piece I am missing in the doc's. thanks mike

3 8

never mind
by Mike Leo Sept. 3, 2006

Sept. 3, 2006

Figured it out. /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf has different "File Sets" that define that. thanks

1 0

ALSA - mic trouble
by Eric Stein Sept. 3, 2006

Sept. 3, 2006

Hi, When I first set up my Ubuntu machine, everything worked fine. But for the last few months (I don't remember exactly how long), my mic has refused to work. Nothing I use can pick up any signal from it. I've tried all the mixers (alsamixer, kmix, the built in GNOME mixer), and none of them show the mic as muted. Is there a way to reset ALSA's volumes and other mixer settings to defaults? I can't seem to find information about this online, and this lack of a fully working sound system has me on the end of my rope. Info: Ubuntu Breezy 5.10 Linux pippin 2.6.12-10-386 #1 Tue Jul 18 22:08:27 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux I'm prepared to spend a good deal of time on this, but I don't know what I need to do. If you need more information, let me know how to get it and I'll be happy to share it. Eric

2 3

iptables use of --mac-source
by Andy Stewart Sept. 2, 2006

Sept. 2, 2006

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HI everybody, I'm playing with my firewall rules, trying to setup a rule that will recognize my laptop's mac address on an incoming connection. I tried this: iptables -I INPUT -m mac --mac-source uu:vv:ww:xx:yy:zz -j LOG - --log-prefix "Laptop Detected: " That worked fine. I saw the appropriate log entry when my laptop ping'd the firewall. The log entry showed the expected mac address of my laptop. At that time, my laptop was plugged into my home network, which is connected to the "internal" interface of my firewall. I then setup iptables to log all incoming packets from the firewall's external interface, and I noticed that in the log all incoming mac source addresses are the same. I didn't expect this. The address is 00:0b:bf:xx:xx:xx, which I think is a piece of Cisco hardware, and I don't have any Cisco hardware at home. Is this some hardware from my ISP ? I'm guessing somebody is rewriting the packets to replace the source mac address, but clearly my knowledge of this is lacking, and thus I'm confused. Any helpers? Thanks, Andy - -- Andy Stewart, Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group Worcester, MA, USA http://www.wlug.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE95kJHl0iXDssISsRAmcUAJ4zD1PDX+TmZca7gzdmtvf7DwWgxACfUH4B 3awkKwfmcBN7nmu/WXjsre4= =6u9G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 4

My memory leak problem from last week.
by ken jones Aug. 28, 2006

Aug. 28, 2006

I have moved from mozilla mail and mozilla browser to thunderbird mail and firefox browser. The memory leak problem seems to have either gone away completely or greatly been reduced. Interesting... thanks for the suggestions and help. Ken Jones

1 0

My memory leak problem.
by ken jones Aug. 24, 2006

Aug. 24, 2006

Everyone: It is hard to believe that X is the problem. It came with Fedora 4 and no one else seems to be reporting it as a bug. I have another Fedora 4 machine that does not display this swap space problem. Karl's idea of looking carefully at my drivers is a good one. This machine has more than one special driver. It is late now. I am tired. I shall pursue this track tomorrow or Friday. If anyone else is interested in the cut and paste of ps auxw lspci uname -a lsmod vmstat dmesg tell me. I will send you a copy. Thank you all:-) Ken Jones Thank you.

1 0

Re: [Wlug] Problem with xosview SWAP space.
by Karl Hiramoto Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

ken jones wrote: > Karl: I hesitate to send this big message to the whole gang. > Attached are the results of your suggestion. Thank you in advance. > Ken Jones > > [root@kjones-fedora kjones]# ps auxw > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > root 3252 51.6 41.7 435956 215064 ? S Aug18 3719:53 /usr/X11R6/bin/X -br -nolisten tcp :0 vt7 -auth /var/run/xauth/A:0 > Well it seems most of your memory is used up by the X process. Keep watching this process if it's memory size grows then there may be a memory leak eating up your memory.. I'm not a fedora expert, are there any X updates? have you run yum or updated your system? What version of X are they using? perhaps send your /var/log/xorg.0.log [root@kjones-fedora kjones]# lspci 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R300 NE [Radeon 9500 Pro] 01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R300 [Radeon 9500 Pro] (Secondary) I see you have an ATI graphics card. Do you know what video driver you are using? perhaps there is a problem there.

1 0

Re: [Wlug] storrage suggestion
by Karl Hiramoto Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

Doug Mildram wrote: >>> i know i can buy a linux PC, and slap in 11 or more 500 GB disks and do >>> > this RAID5. > > doug> Hate to disrespect our beloved wlug-favorite-OS, but, > Linux for NFS server may be a bad choice....a bad implementation, > I say from 2.4-kernel experience and I dont THINK it improved in 2.6. > (have you used linux NFS server in demanding/loaded situations? > ...the linux load avg goes to 20 as it becomes useless.) I have setup a few servers with 1TB, 1.5TB and 2TB doing NFS, mainly for video streaming and at most 15-20 NFS clients. Using kernel 2.6.15.7 for a while now with no performance complaints. I have seen 15 NFS clients streaming DVD quality mpeg2 video (9mbps) work nicely. Getting over 2TB, tho starts to be a lot of disks and there are heat problems, also problems finding enough drive bays. -- Karl Hiramoto http://karl.hiramoto.org/

1 0

storrage suggestion
by Karl Hiramoto Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

Anyone have suggestions? i need: * >= 5TB disk space * iSCSI, ATA over Ethernet, or NFS mountable to linux >= 2.6.15 *RAID (must survive single disk failure) and must know when a failure happened. * $$/TB is important. * Must be able to sustain minimum 10MB/s disk read on Gbit network. normally these will be big multimedia files. Yes, i know i can buy a linux PC, and slap in 11 or more 500 GB disks and do this RAID5. Something off the shelf, and easy to service would be nice. -- Karl Hiramoto http://karl.hiramoto.org/

2 2