- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] Best 802.11abgn router?

by John Stoffel

>>>>> "Frank" == Frank Sweetser <fs(a)WPI.EDU> writes: Frank> On 10/13/2010 10:26 AM, John Stoffel wrote: >> >> Guys, >> >> I'm looking to replace my WAP54G (802.11bg) wireless access point. I >> really need to get more speed to the wife's computer, and I don't want >> to run wires. >> >> I'm thinking I'd like to get something that DD-WRT can run on, and >> possibly something with dual radios and/or dual 2.4ghz and 5.0ghz >> band, so I can have a secured network, and an open, slower network for >> guests. >> >> My home network looks like this: >> >> cable modem <---> router <----> GigE Lan switch <-- clients >> | >> | >> WAP54G Frank> Congratulations, you're me a month ago =) Heh, so where do you end up putting your new wireless router in your network? Did you replace the core router, or add on? Yeah I'm a professional SysAdmin, but I don't do the network side day to day... so I want to stay secure. Probably way too paranoid, but that's me. Frank> I got pointed at http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/ as a resource Frank> for comparing these devices. I ended up going with the Netgear Frank> WNDR3700, and have been very happy - ridiculous performance Frank> gains, including better internet performance. Nice. Frank> I do have to warn you that I tried dd-wrt on it, and it didn't Frank> work so great. It was a little flaky, and when I tried to Frank> upgrade it to a newer build, I semi-bricked it. (Luckily Frank> these boxes, when bricked, come up in a recovery mode where Frank> you can easily feed it a new image via TFTP, so bringing it Frank> back from the dead was trivial.) Instead I threw openwrt on Frank> it, with dnsmasq, dyndns, and openvpn configured, and it's Frank> been rock solid and blazingly fast. Interesting. I've been reading Newegg reviews and it's been interesting hearing that for some stuff openwrt is better than dd-wrt. Frank> The only glitch there is that it's a little more strict about Frank> wireless security behaviour, so some non-compliant devices Frank> (droid1 phones running android 2.2, in my case) can't associate Frank> at WPA2/AES. Bummers. :] That's why I figure I'll keep around my old WAP54G for wep devices and stuff that I don't care about much. Frank> I've heard very good things about the buffalo devices, Frank> especially since they ship with dd-wrt from the factory. They Frank> don't have the same performance (again, smallnetbuilder has Frank> excellent benchmarks for side by side comparisons), but are a Frank> lot cheaper. One drawback of that particular model at least is Frank> that it's single band, 2.4GHz only. Personally I strongly Frank> recommend going with a dual band device, as 2.4 these days Frank> tends to be a pea soup of interference, while the 5GHz bands Frank> that 11a uses has a lot more open channels available. Yeah, I think I really want dual band, dual radio, gigabit. Going to have to pay for it though. But if the device lasts, I'm not too upset. Frank> Chuck and I had talked about putting together some slides on Frank> openwrt, guess this means I should get started now... Go go go!

Oct. 13, 2010

Re: [Wlug] Best 802.11abgn router?

by Frank Sweetser

On 10/13/2010 10:26 AM, John Stoffel wrote: > > Guys, > > I'm looking to replace my WAP54G (802.11bg) wireless access point. I > really need to get more speed to the wife's computer, and I don't want > to run wires. > > I'm thinking I'd like to get something that DD-WRT can run on, and > possibly something with dual radios and/or dual 2.4ghz and 5.0ghz > band, so I can have a secured network, and an open, slower network for > guests. > > My home network looks like this: > > cable modem <---> router <----> GigE Lan switch <-- clients > | > | > WAP54G Congratulations, you're me a month ago =) > Unfortunately, my router is only 100mb/s on each port, which is fine > for WAN access, and most wireless, but not any more. And I don't want > to replace it since it's a WRAP board from PC-engines running m0n0wall > and doing a *great* job for what I need. Silent, no moving parts, > easy to manage. > > Mostly, I want a fast, secure wireless WPA2 home wireless network. > Maybe I'd keep the WAP54G around for public access... or maybe it's > time to bite the bullet and replace my WRAP board with something > better? > > I'm looking at the following: > > Netgear WNDR3700 > Linksys E2000 > Linksys WRT610N > ASUS RT-N16 > BUFFALO WZR-HP-G300NH (native DD-WRT support from factory!) I got pointed at http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/ as a resource for comparing these devices. I ended up going with the Netgear WNDR3700, and have been very happy - ridiculous performance gains, including better internet performance. I do have to warn you that I tried dd-wrt on it, and it didn't work so great. It was a little flaky, and when I tried to upgrade it to a newer build, I semi-bricked it. (Luckily these boxes, when bricked, come up in a recovery mode where you can easily feed it a new image via TFTP, so bringing it back from the dead was trivial.) Instead I threw openwrt on it, with dnsmasq, dyndns, and openvpn configured, and it's been rock solid and blazingly fast. The only glitch there is that it's a little more strict about wireless security behaviour, so some non-compliant devices (droid1 phones running android 2.2, in my case) can't associate at WPA2/AES. I've heard very good things about the buffalo devices, especially since they ship with dd-wrt from the factory. They don't have the same performance (again, smallnetbuilder has excellent benchmarks for side by side comparisons), but are a lot cheaper. One drawback of that particular model at least is that it's single band, 2.4GHz only. Personally I strongly recommend going with a dual band device, as 2.4 these days tends to be a pea soup of interference, while the 5GHz bands that 11a uses has a lot more open channels available. Chuck and I had talked about putting together some slides on openwrt, guess this means I should get started now... -- Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a solution that WPI Senior Network Engineer | is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4 E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC

Oct. 13, 2010

Best 802.11abgn router?

by John Stoffel

Guys, I'm looking to replace my WAP54G (802.11bg) wireless access point. I really need to get more speed to the wife's computer, and I don't want to run wires. I'm thinking I'd like to get something that DD-WRT can run on, and possibly something with dual radios and/or dual 2.4ghz and 5.0ghz band, so I can have a secured network, and an open, slower network for guests. My home network looks like this: cable modem <---> router <----> GigE Lan switch <-- clients | | WAP54G Unfortunately, my router is only 100mb/s on each port, which is fine for WAN access, and most wireless, but not any more. And I don't want to replace it since it's a WRAP board from PC-engines running m0n0wall and doing a *great* job for what I need. Silent, no moving parts, easy to manage. Mostly, I want a fast, secure wireless WPA2 home wireless network. Maybe I'd keep the WAP54G around for public access... or maybe it's time to bite the bullet and replace my WRAP board with something better? I'm looking at the following: Netgear WNDR3700 Linksys E2000 Linksys WRT610N ASUS RT-N16 BUFFALO WZR-HP-G300NH (native DD-WRT support from factory!) Any hints or suggestions or feedback? Thanks, John

Oct. 13, 2010

Linux InstallFest

by Dignan, Patrick

Hi everyone, I've been a lurker on these lists for a while, but I wanted to let everyone know: WPI's ACM chapter is hosting a Linux Installfest on November 2 at 7:00PM. We expect to have a panel of Linux community members speaking prior to the installs. Last year we had an estimated turnout of 50-75 students. If any of you would like to join us for installation, to hear the community members speak, or just for moral support then please feel free! We will be meeting in Fuller Laboratories Room #320. Best, Patrick Dignan

Oct. 5, 2010

Re: [Wlug] New Memeber

by Andy Stewart

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joshua D. Demallistre wrote: > So, to make a story short I am a new member to this > group. I've been here, close to the Worcester area > and would like to meet with you guys. I have been > using Linux for the past 10 years without a LUG, so > this time I would like to do things differently, and get > together. Basically I wanted to say that I have been a > lone ranger for the last 10 year. I have been to the > website but there is no mentioned of the next > meeting. Hi Joshua, On the WLUG home page, click on the yellow box at the top that says "WLUG Meetings". This will take you to a page that lists the meeting dates so you can plan. The meeting topic is often not known until the last minute. Feel free to join us anytime! Andy - -- Andy Stewart (KB1OIQ) Founder: Worcester Linux Users' Group Founder: Chelmsford Linux Meetup Group President: PART of Westford, MA (WB1GOF) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFMoT+bOjiraCaOTOoRAtosAJ9/FRyfyYISwtdkgnGtMI5eNHZuzACg0Uuo z0Ufv8RVplkhnRmWk4eA2eY= =64zD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Sept. 28, 2010

New Memeber

by Joshua D. Demallistre

So, to make a story short I am a new member to this group. I've been here, close to the Worcester area and would like to meet with you guys. I have been using Linux for the past 10 years without a LUG, so this time I would like to do things differently, and get together. Basically I wanted to say that I have been a lone ranger for the last 10 year. I have been to the website but there is no mentioned of the next meeting.

Sept. 28, 2010

Re: [Wlug] Webcam program

by Frank Sweetser

On 9/16/2010 9:19 PM, dulsi(a)identicalsoftware.com wrote: >> http://ekiga.org/ has a client for Windows& Linux. > > Same problem as I believe pidgin would have. I want to setup a conference > with audio and video from 2 or more other people. Ekiga appears to only > be able to do video to one person. It has an audio conference number but > nothing for video. It may still require multicast connectivity, but the Access Grid was designed to handle many to many online meetings. http://www.accessgrid.org/ (don't be intimidated by the large scale room setups, it actually works fine with a laptop and webcam.) -- Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a solution that WPI Senior Network Engineer | is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4 E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC

Sept. 17, 2010

Re: [Wlug] Webcam program

by dulsi＠identicalsoftware.com

> http://ekiga.org/ has a client for Windows & Linux. Same problem as I believe pidgin would have. I want to setup a conference with audio and video from 2 or more other people. Ekiga appears to only be able to do video to one person. It has an audio conference number but nothing for video.

Sept. 17, 2010

Re: [Wlug] Webcam program

by Cole Lavallee

http://ekiga.org/ has a client for Windows & Linux. On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:54 AM, <dulsi(a)identicalsoftware.com> wrote: > > pidgin has support for linux integrated, but the windows support hasnt > > been > > merged yet. but it does exist.woadlm > > I know it does video but does that do multiple people or is it just one to > one. I thought it was just one to one. I didn't see anything to indicate > you could do a conference with separate video streams coming from 4 > different people. > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > -- Cole Lavallee 401.935.4007 http://www.linkedin.com/in/colelavallee

Sept. 16, 2010

Re: [Wlug] Webcam program

by dulsi＠identicalsoftware.com

> pidgin has support for linux integrated, but the windows support hasnt > been > merged yet. but it does exist.woadlm I know it does video but does that do multiple people or is it just one to one. I thought it was just one to one. I didn't see anything to indicate you could do a conference with separate video streams coming from 4 different people.

Sept. 16, 2010