- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] VPN Question

by Scott Venier

You will need the client software for whatever technology the VPN uses. You've got choices ranging from IPsec (the linux client is called FreeS/WAN) to pptp (with a sick hack of a linux client that I maintain) with a bunch of other choices in between. Find out what the VPN is based on and then do a google for that and linux. Scott On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Michael Long wrote: > Hi all, > > I have only connected to a network via a VPN using windows software in the > past. How do I go about establishing a VPN connection using linux. Do I need > to get any software and what other information will I need besides my login, > password, and server IP address? > > Thanks, > Mike > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Aug. 28, 2001

VPN Question

by Michael Long

Hi all, I have only connected to a network via a VPN using windows software in the past. How do I go about establishing a VPN connection using linux. Do I need to get any software and what other information will I need besides my login, password, and server IP address? Thanks, Mike

Aug. 28, 2001

Re: [Wlug] apache and SetOutputFilter

by Dan Potter

You're half-right: the SetOutputHandler option is apparently for Apache 2.0 and most people should still be using Apache 1.3. However, SSI (what .shtml files are) should still work with Apache 1.3. The relative configuration lines are: Options +Includes In the <Directory> block, and: AddType text/html .shtml AddHandler server-parsed .shtml Either also in the directory block or with the rest of the add type/handler statements. Since I haven't actually used SSI, I'll just send you to the appropriate Apache documentation for Apache 1.3, the version that comes with RedHat: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/howto/ssi.html Hope this helps :) On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Brad Noyes wrote: > i figured it out, i have an old versin of apache (well sorta i guess this is > only for apache 2.0) > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 03:24:39PM -0400, Brad Noyes wrote: > > Hi Fellas, > > I'm trying to configure apache to handle .shtml files. I don't know much about > > apache configuration, so i got some info from apache.org about this. > > i ended up with this config chunck > > # put in so we can use .shtml files in /home/httpd/includes > > <Directory "/home/httpd/includes"> > > Options +Includes > > # (took from http://www.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_include.html) > > <IfModule mod_include.c> > > AddType text/html .shtml > > <FilesMatch "\.shtml(\..+)?$"> > > SetOutputFilter INCLUDES > > </FilesMatch> > > </IfModule> > > </Directory> > > > > > > When i parse the config file i get this > > # httpd -t > > Syntax error on line 408 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: > > Invalid command 'SetOutputFilter', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration > > > > any suggestions here? i'm using the apache that came with red hat 7.0 > > Thanks, > > --Brad > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wlug mailing list > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Aug. 27, 2001

Re: [Wlug] apache and SetOutputFilter

by Brad Noyes

i figured it out, i have an old versin of apache (well sorta i guess this is only for apache 2.0) On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 03:24:39PM -0400, Brad Noyes wrote: > Hi Fellas, > I'm trying to configure apache to handle .shtml files. I don't know much about > apache configuration, so i got some info from apache.org about this. > i ended up with this config chunck > # put in so we can use .shtml files in /home/httpd/includes > <Directory "/home/httpd/includes"> > Options +Includes > # (took from http://www.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_include.html) > <IfModule mod_include.c> > AddType text/html .shtml > <FilesMatch "\.shtml(\..+)?$"> > SetOutputFilter INCLUDES > </FilesMatch> > </IfModule> > </Directory> > > > When i parse the config file i get this > # httpd -t > Syntax error on line 408 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: > Invalid command 'SetOutputFilter', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration > > any suggestions here? i'm using the apache that came with red hat 7.0 > Thanks, > --Brad > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

Aug. 27, 2001

apache and SetOutputFilter

by Brad Noyes

Hi Fellas, I'm trying to configure apache to handle .shtml files. I don't know much about apache configuration, so i got some info from apache.org about this. i ended up with this config chunck # put in so we can use .shtml files in /home/httpd/includes <Directory "/home/httpd/includes"> Options +Includes # (took from http://www.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_include.html) <IfModule mod_include.c> AddType text/html .shtml <FilesMatch "\.shtml(\..+)?$"> SetOutputFilter INCLUDES </FilesMatch> </IfModule> </Directory> When i parse the config file i get this # httpd -t Syntax error on line 408 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Invalid command 'SetOutputFilter', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration any suggestions here? i'm using the apache that came with red hat 7.0 Thanks, --Brad

Aug. 27, 2001

Re: [Wlug] SPARC pickup

by Josh Huber

Orbitz <orbitz(a)firest0rm.org> writes: > Just use pine guys, it asks you if you want to use reply-to address > or from address. personal, i can deal with deleteing e-mails i > dont' want, and i prefer it this way so that when somebody answers > somebodies question, i get to know how it was done incase i ever run > into it in the future. but tha tis just me. oh god, not someone suggesting pine! :P Reasonable email clients should have this configurable... for mutt: ignore_list_reply_to Type: boolean Default: no Affects the behaviour of the reply function when replying to messages from mailing lists. When set, if the "Reply-To:" field is set to the same value as the "To:" field, Mutt assumes that the "Reply- To:" field was set by the mailing list to automate responses to the list, and will ignore this field. To direct a response to the mailing list when this option is set, use the list-reply function; group- reply will reply to both the sender and the list. Mutt's a great console based email client, and I strongly reccommend it over pine. ttyl, -- Josh Huber

Aug. 24, 2001

Re: [Wlug] SPARC pickup

by Orbitz

Just use pine guys, it asks you if you want to use reply-to address or from address. personal, i can deal with deleteing e-mails i dont' want, and i prefer it this way so that when somebody answers somebodies question, i get to know how it was done incase i ever run into it in the future. but tha tis just me. Orbitz p.s. sorry this is so horribly typed, i'm sleepy

Aug. 24, 2001

Re: [Wlug] SPARC pickup

by John Stoffel

Fuck!! I just got burned by this stupid reply-to goes to the list, not the writer of the email. Chalk me up as one who is pissed by this setup too. John

Aug. 23, 2001

Re: [Wlug] SPARC pickup

by John Stoffel

A> Tuesday came and went ... the next times I can come by are A> Friday (8/24) or Monday (8/27). If either of these days work, A> please send directions and possible times. Thanks, Andrew Sorry, it's been a bad week, we just let go a bunch of people and I'm doing account lock downs, etc. Anyway, tomorrow after around 6pm would be fine, or monday after 6pm. Simple directions from Natick... Rt 90 West to Rt 495 North to Rt 290 West to Exit 23B, Rt 140 North to Go about 1.5 miles, turn left onto Sewall Street. Third Right onto "Long Leaf" First Left onto Fox Tail Way Fourth driveway on left, #25. 508-579-6331 (cell).

Aug. 23, 2001

SPARC pickup

by A. Perry

John, Tuesday came and went ... the next times I can come by are Friday (8/24) or Monday (8/27). If either of these days work, please send directions and possible times. Thanks, Andrew

Aug. 23, 2001

Embedded Systems Conference in Boston Sept 5-7

by Skip Gaede

I received the following from techies.com. You have received this email from techies.com on behalf of CMP Media because you are currently signed up to hear about local events from techies.com. Please proceed to the end of this email for instructions on how to manage your subscription. ************************************************************ Embedded Systems Conference Boston Sept. 5-7, 2001 Hynes Convention Center Boston, MA http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0Erv0AC The Embedded Systems Conference Boston is the largest exhibition on the East Coast for engineers and developers working with embedded systems. You can explore new tools and technologies than you can use as soon as you return to the office. Join us on the show floor to see embedded technologies such as embedded Internet tools, Java, RTOSes, Flash memory chips, and networking tools. Techies.com members can register for FREE admission to the product exhibition, the keynote addresses, and the opening night reception. **Use priority code VML when registering to get your free show pass. If you're not at ESC Boston, you'll miss: * A three-day exhibition featuring more than 200 companies. This is your chance to preview new embedded products and do all of your shopping under one roof. * Keynote Address, Wednesday, Sept. 5, 1 p.m. - 2 p.m. by Cliff Stoll, author of "The Cuckoo's Egg: Tracking a Spy Through the Maze of Computer Espionage." -- "Reflections of a Computer Contrarian." * Keynote Address, Thursday, Sept. 6, 12:30 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. by Michael Tiemann, CTO of Red Hat -- "Open Source in Embedded: Dilemma or Delight?" * Panel Discussion, Tuesday, Sept. 4, 4:45 p.m. - 6 p.m. moderated by Michael Barr, Editor-in-Chief, Embedded Systems Programming -- "Is Java Ready for Embedded Use?" Register today! http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0Erw0AD ---- Subscription Management ---- Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from techies.com newsletters GOTO: http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0DWb0AO To change your email address for all communications from techies.com, get your login information ready and GOTO: http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0EaS0AK Lost your login information? Go to: http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0BDE0AY If you need HELP using the site, or would like to offer feedback, please click the link below to send your request. We appreciate your input. A member advocate team member will respond to your request as soon as possible. http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0BX50Ac

Aug. 23, 2001

Re: [Wlug] gettin' the Sparc Classic on the network...

by Brian J.Conway

> I'm a little paranoid with DHCP... at work I use dhcpcd because pump > doesn't work. At home (with road-runner), I use pump because dhcpcd > doesn't work. Am I on crack? Probably not (though there is room for error on that one). At work I've gotten neither pump nor ISC's dhcpclient to work on my laptop, but dhcpcd works perfectly. I haven't tried any others at WPI, as it worked there on the first try. I don't suppose anyone has a real explanation for flakiness between DHCP servers/clients, other than claiming that our Win2k DHCP server at work sucks (I already know THAT)? Brian J. Conway dogbert(a)clue4all.net "LINUX is obsolete" - Andrew S. Tanenbaum, creator of Minix

Aug. 22, 2001

Re: [Wlug] gettin' the Sparc Classic on the network...

by john＠stoffel.org

Sands> Settin' up the box I won at the last WLUG meeting. I wanna Sands> get it on the network here at work. When I watch the boot Sands> messages, I see "eth0 LANCE <mac address>" and "eth0 using Sands> auto-carrier-detection", but i don't see an entry for /dev/eth0 Sands> when i look there. I can ping the local loopback, but when I Sands> try to use DHCP in linuxconf to let it grab an address, but in Sands> ifconfig, i still only see the entry for the local loopback. Sands> Is there a different location for the eth0 device? Any hints? Sands> Anything would be appreciated. Thanx everyone. The box should already be semi setup to use an address between 192.168.1.101-105, or something like that. I don't remember exactly what I used and I'm not at home to check. The LANCE part is the ethernet chip, eth0 is the interface you need to use to access the net. Do you have any errors in the log file when you run dhcpd on the box? It might need to have some stuff put into /etc/dhcpd.conf to get it working right. I can check this at home if need be. And if need be, I can rip a copy of RH 6.1 for Sparc and bring it to the next meeting for those who'd like to get packages for it. John

Aug. 22, 2001

Re: [Wlug] gettin' the Sparc Classic on the network...

by Chuck Homic

On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 05:04:44PM -0400, Ben Dow wrote: > Well, I might be a little out of touch with my old-fashioned Slackware > ways, but I don't think there's supposed to be a /dev/eth0. DHCP must not > be working if it's not showing up in ifconfig, but try ifconfig eth0 to > see if the interface exists. You can always try running dhcpcd manually, > too. Right. eth0 is a network interface, not a device, so there is no /dev/ entry. If you're just trying to test the interface, you can also just assign it an IP by hand by doing "ifconfig eth0 192.168.blah.blah". You might also need some -netmask goodness, but I'm not sure. "man ifconfig" has the goods. Then once that works, I'd start getting into DHCP. I'm a little paranoid with DHCP... at work I use dhcpcd because pump doesn't work. At home (with road-runner), I use pump because dhcpcd doesn't work. Am I on crack? -Chuck

Aug. 22, 2001

Re: [Wlug] gettin' the Sparc Classic on the network...

by Ben Dow

Well, I might be a little out of touch with my old-fashioned Slackware ways, but I don't think there's supposed to be a /dev/eth0. DHCP must not be working if it's not showing up in ifconfig, but try ifconfig eth0 to see if the interface exists. You can always try running dhcpcd manually, too. On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Sands Fish wrote: > Hello all, > Settin' up the box I won at the last WLUG meeting. I wanna get it on > the network here at work. When I watch the boot messages, I see "eth0 LANCE > <mac address>" and "eth0 using auto-carrier-detection", but i don't see an > entry for /dev/eth0 when i look there. I can ping the local loopback, but > when I try to use DHCP in linuxconf to let it grab an address, but in > ifconfig, i still only see the entry for the local loopback. Is there a > different location for the eth0 device? Any hints? Anything would be > appreciated. Thanx everyone. > > - Sands Fish > - eCommerce > - telecomNOW > - sands(a)telecomnow.com >

Aug. 22, 2001

gettin' the Sparc Classic on the network...

by Sands Fish

Hello all, Settin' up the box I won at the last WLUG meeting. I wanna get it on the network here at work. When I watch the boot messages, I see "eth0 LANCE <mac address>" and "eth0 using auto-carrier-detection", but i don't see an entry for /dev/eth0 when i look there. I can ping the local loopback, but when I try to use DHCP in linuxconf to let it grab an address, but in ifconfig, i still only see the entry for the local loopback. Is there a different location for the eth0 device? Any hints? Anything would be appreciated. Thanx everyone. - Sands Fish - eCommerce - telecomNOW - sands(a)telecomnow.com

Aug. 22, 2001

Re: [Wlug] REPLY TO FROM (!!!)

by Andy Stewart

HI all, Nothing is perfect in this world, especially computers, no matter how much we all choose to deny it! :-) With that said, please use care when replying, and make sure that your favorite mailing tool sends your reply wherever you desire it to go, be it the list or the original sender. Have a sense of humor when somebody obviously makes the inevitable mistake. I think this is the best we can do until somebody invents the DWIM button on e-mail GUIs (do what I mean). :-) Later, Andy -- Andy Stewart Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group Worcester, MA, USA http://www.wlug.org

Aug. 20, 2001

Re: [Wlug] REPLY TO FROM (!!!)

by Chuck Homic

I'd just like to say this is my favorite thread in the world! :) You guys are all nuts... and I realize that having pedants like you is the reason everything works so well. I've never had that kind of energy, but from a spectator's point of view this is just awesome. God bless WLUG! (BTW, I'm with Theo... I just check my headers, dude! :) ) -Chuck

Aug. 20, 2001

Re: [Wlug] REPLY TO FROM (!!!)

by Josh Huber

Aaron Haviland <orion(a)tribble.dyndns.org> writes: > i'm more familiar with this setup myself. mutt works nicely with > mailing lists. i have "bind pager l list-reply" and "lists `cd > ~/inboxes && echo *`" in my muttrc, and on most mailman mailing > lists, i can just hit 'l' to reply to the list. if i hit 'r', it > prompts me to reply to the list or the sender. I'd like to point out that the whole purpose of list-reply in mutt is to reply to the list, and to have reply ("r") go to the author. Why bother having it prompt you if you can have "l" send a message to the list, and "r" send a message to the author? Having Reply-to point back at the mailing list is designed to compensate for other MUA's inability to distiguish between a reply and a followup. (*cough* Outlook *cough* pine *cough*) :) ttyl, -- Josh Huber

Aug. 20, 2001

Re: [Wlug] REPLY TO FROM (!!!)

by Aaron Haviland

Doug Chamberlin said: > At 8/20/2001 11:53 AM (Monday), ccb(a)acm.org wrote: > > > - Some people expect that a reply will goto the group. > > > > > > However, this causes a number of people to respond to the group > > > when they mean the response to goto the sender only. > > > >Of the 40 or so mailing lists that I'm regularly a participant on, the > >wlug list is the only one exhibiting this behavior. It's generally > >consider an anachronism, dating to the days when we all had "!" in our > >email addresses. > > Of the 15 or so mailing lists that I'm regularly a participant on, there > are NO lists which are setup so replies go directly to senders instead of > the list as a whole. Replying by default only to senders hinders one of the > primary benefits of participation - that of sharing info. It is generally > considered "the way to go" to have replies default to the whole list with > strong objections made every time it is suggested that it be changed. i'm more familiar with this setup myself. mutt works nicely with mailing lists. i have "bind pager l list-reply" and "lists `cd ~/inboxes && echo *`" in my muttrc, and on most mailman mailing lists, i can just hit 'l' to reply to the list. if i hit 'r', it prompts me to reply to the list or the sender. just sharing :) -- Aaron Haviland orion [at] tribble [dot] dyndns [dot] org orion [at] parsed [dot] net Random #afda Quote #1: "Cool - my random quote is '"random quotes" is great'" - Tag

Aug. 20, 2001

stat syscall in RH7.1

by Brad Noyes

Hi Fellas I'm trying to get a shared library to work with my red hat 7.1 system. The problem is; when the library makes a system call to stat() i get "<./myprog> error while loading shared libraries: <mylib.so>: undefined symbol: stat". I have tried this on other distro's (debian, namely), and it was able to make the syscall just fine. Any ideas? Here's some info that you may find helpful: i compile with these lines: gcc -g -fPIC -c -g <mylib>.c -o <mylib>.o ld -shared -soname <mylib>.so.0 -o <mylib>.so.0.0.0 -lc <mylib>.o gcc -g <myprog>.o -o <myprog> -L. -l<mylib> ldd <myprog> <mylib>.so.0 => ./<mylib>.so.0 (0x40018000) libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x4002d000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) gcc --version 2.96 Thanks for any sugesstions, --Brad

Aug. 20, 2001

Re: [Wlug] REPLY TO FROM (!!!)

by Doug Chamberlin

I sent my reply, not because I care strongly one way or the other, but because I didn't want the subject to be too one-sided (since the original message was so strong). There are two very legitimate sides to the debate. I once participated in a list which banned any form of quoting. They had a well considered rationale which included: 1) Replies would be more considered when the writer had to restate the item being replied to. 2) Elimintated over-quoting and other lazy, off-hand replies. 3) Slows the pace of exchange just enough for reasonable reflection, retarding the heated build up of flames. Worked quite well. Would not be popular today.

Aug. 20, 2001

Re: [Wlug] REPLY TO FROM (!!!)

by Josh Huber

Doug Chamberlin <DChamberlin(a)ne.mediaone.net> writes: > Of the 15 or so mailing lists that I'm regularly a participant on, > there are NO lists which are setup so replies go directly to senders > instead of the list as a whole. Replying by default only to senders > hinders one of the primary benefits of participation - that of > sharing info. It is generally considered "the way to go" to have > replies default to the whole list with strong objections made every > time it is suggested that it be changed. Which is interesting. This is the only list I'm on that has broken reply-to. (handy that I can turn on the "broken reply-to" for this list with my MUA, so it does replies properly -- to the SENDER). For more information: http://www.halisp.net/halisp/reply-to-harmful.html What about the case where the sender would prefer replies to go to a different address? I wonder if the list software will overwrite that field? (bad!) -- Josh Huber

Aug. 20, 2001

Re: [Wlug] REPLY TO FROM (!!!)

by Jeffry Smith

Doug Chamberlin said: >At 8/20/2001 11:53 AM (Monday), ccb(a)acm.org wrote: >> > - Some people expect that a reply will goto the group. >> > >> > However, this causes a number of people to respond to the group >> > when they mean the response to goto the sender only. >> >>Of the 40 or so mailing lists that I'm regularly a participant on, the >>wlug list is the only one exhibiting this behavior. It's generally >>consider an anachronism, dating to the days when we all had "!" in our >>email addresses. > >Of the 15 or so mailing lists that I'm regularly a participant on, there >are NO lists which are setup so replies go directly to senders instead of >the list as a whole. Replying by default only to senders hinders one of the >primary benefits of participation - that of sharing info. It is generally >considered "the way to go" to have replies default to the whole list with >strong objections made every time it is suggested that it be changed. > Not a main member of the group (only the mailing list), so take it for what it's worth, but most of the ones I'm on default to replies to the owner. A few changed over to that after some stuff accidently got sent to the list that REALLY should have been private. See http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html jeff ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeffry Smith Technical Sales Consultant Mission Critical Linux smith(a)missioncriticallinux.com phone:603.930.9739 fax:978.446.9470 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Thought for today: greenbar n. A style of fanfolded continuous-feed paper with alternating green and white bars on it, especially used in old-style line printers. This slang almost certainly dates way back to mainframe days.

Aug. 20, 2001

Re: [Wlug] REPLY TO FROM (!!!)

by Brian Niece

At 11:13 AM 8/20/01 -0400, you wrote: > Can we configure this list so that the "Principle of Least >Astonishment" holds when replying to FROM? > > A reply to FROM should reply to the sender, not the list. Let me chime in here with an apology. For a lot of discussions, it probably does make sense to have the replies go to the entire list. I just keep forgetting to check the To: header when I'm sending ones that not everyone needs to see. That "Reply" button is just too easy to hit. Sorry, Brian -- Brian K. Niece, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Chemistry Assumption College 500 Salisbury St. Worcester, MA 01609-1296 508-767-7209

Aug. 20, 2001