- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] Latest SSH.

by Michael Patrick Frysinger

it means that the libcrypto.so.2 was compiled against a different version of libraries ... to find out what is missing, try this: `ldd libcrypto.so.2` libcrypto.so.2 is part of openssl ... i'm assuming you d/l-ed the binaries of openssl, which means you'll have to d/l some more binary packages, or d/l the SRPM to openssl and compile it yourself -mike On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Aramico wrote: > Hi, > I've removed my ssl rpm before, now I'm installing the latest version of ssl (openssl - openssl-0.9.6g.tar.gz ). > > Everythin' goes okay, no error found.... > THat something i confused just about getting this message when i'm trying to start up the sshd. > sshd: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > In fact, how can i get the source of libcrypto.so.2, how can i make a link to this ? the source ? > > THanks.

Sept. 30, 2002

Redhat mirror

by Haines, Charles Allen

I saw a redhat mirror float across here, but I accidently deleted the email. What was the mirror again? ----------------------------------------- Chuck Haines GDC Systems Administrator Infinity Complex Developer WPILA Lab Manager ----------------------------------------- AIM: CyberGrex ICQ: 3707881 Yahoo: CyberGrex_27 Cell: (410) 610-6343. ----------------------------------------- "Geek by nature, Linux by choice."

Sept. 30, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Completelly Uninstall for .tar version!

by stoffel＠lucent.com

Aramico> How can i make a completelly uninstall for an application Aramico> that has been installed by using .tar sources ? Use the program 'checkinstall'. It will replace the final 'make install' step for you and build a package that can then be installed/removed with the normal package installation tools. This should be in all distributions from now on, what a great thing to have around! John

Sept. 30, 2002

Red Hat 8.0

by Charles R. Anderson

Come and get it: ftp://angus.ind.wpi.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat/linux/8.0/en ISO's and full install tree. wpila.org seems to be down right now, so when it comes back could one of you forward my message to them? Thanks. -- Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886

Sept. 30, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Completelly Uninstall for .tar version!

by Chuck Homic

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:28:00AM -0400, Charles R. Anderson wrote: > GNU Stow? Awwww, yeah! Stow... how could I forget? Stow was my hero as I was cobbling new software into my old broken Redhat 5.0 install! -Chuck

Sept. 30, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Completelly Uninstall for .tar version!

by Charles R. Anderson

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:22:35AM -0400, Chuck Homic wrote: chuck> And if someone knows the name of that program that makes separate trees chuck> for your tarballs and soft links 'em into your main tree, that could be chuck> the most useful thing for the original poster. GNU Stow? -- Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886

Sept. 30, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Completelly Uninstall for .tar version!

by Chuck Homic

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:48:06AM -0400, Bill Mills-Curran wrote: > The right (and sometimes painful) answer is to use rpm's for your > installs. I've recently been teaching myself to make my own rpm's. > It's not real easy, because the documentation is lacking, but you > should be able to do most basic things ok. And, the rpm's figure out > your dependencies on the fly, and will make later installation of that > utility in other places a real snap. A hearty amen to that. I was too lazy to make a .deb for my customized mutt install, and I've wanted to install it on 2 other systems since. And my dependencies are weird and I have to --force sometimes when I know I have something. And if someone knows the name of that program that makes separate trees for your tarballs and soft links 'em into your main tree, that could be the most useful thing for the original poster. But alas, I've forgotten, my mind weakened by the simplicity of Debian. -Chuck

Sept. 30, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Completelly Uninstall for .tar version!

by Bill Mills-Curran

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Aramico wrote: > Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:40:39 +0700 > From: Aramico <aramico(a)duahati.com> > Reply-To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > Subject: [Wlug] Completelly Uninstall for .tar version! > > How can i make a completelly uninstall for an application that has been installed by using .tar sources ? > Well, the simple answer is, rebuild the application from the tar (unless you still have the build are populated), and see if "make uninstall" would work. Many (most?) make files provide for removing the installation. For some installations, it gets more complicated, because you may have other installations that depend on this one. If that is the case, then you will make those utilities useless. The right (and sometimes painful) answer is to use rpm's for your installs. I've recently been teaching myself to make my own rpm's. It's not real easy, because the documentation is lacking, but you should be able to do most basic things ok. And, the rpm's figure out your dependencies on the fly, and will make later installation of that utility in other places a real snap. Bill

Sept. 30, 2002

Completelly Uninstall for .tar version!

by Aramico

How can i make a completelly uninstall for an application that has been installed by using .tar sources ?

Sept. 30, 2002

Latest SSH.

by Aramico

Hi, I've removed my ssl rpm before, now I'm installing the latest version of ssl (openssl - openssl-0.9.6g.tar.gz ). Everythin' goes okay, no error found.... THat something i confused just about getting this message when i'm trying to start up the sshd. sshd: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory In fact, how can i get the source of libcrypto.so.2, how can i make a link to this ? the source ? THanks.

Sept. 30, 2002

Re: [Wlug] X tricks

by Michael Patrick Frysinger

why do that ? you can setup native X sessions on :0 and then vnc into it remotely ... -mike On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Steve Freitag wrote: > How about VNC? > > Your native X-Server is :0 > The VNCserver is :1 > The VNCviewer puts up a window on :0 with the contents of the VNCserver :1? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "brad" <maitre(a)ccs.neu.edu> > To: <wlug(a)mail.wlug.org> > Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 8:07 PM > Subject: [Wlug] X tricks > > > > Hi All, > > I was wondering if there is a way to create a window that would be a > tunnel > > into another X server. For example if i'm running a server on :0 and on > :1, i > > would like to have a window, which is connected to :0, that would show > what > > is being displayed on :1. > > > > This is similar to how vmware works. When you start vmware in window on :0 > it > > will actually start another X server on :1 and display (in a window) the > > contents on :1. > > > > Is this possible (other then with vmware)? > > > > Thanks, > > --brad > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wlug mailing list > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > >

Sept. 30, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Charter Pipeline Networking

by Bill Smith

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:29:13 -0400 "Thomas Carey" <tcarey70(a)hotmail.com> wrote: TC> Win 98 Second Edition came with Internet connection sharing, albeit TC> with a second nic in your system. One nic connected to the cable TC> modem, one nic connected to the hub/switch. It serves as a TC> dhcp/proxy server, and worked flawlessly for me. Actually a good MS TC> product that I would recommend. It probably is not installed by TC> default, and you may have to add that component in the control panel TC> (add/remove programs, windows setup...). i tried that once... i couldn't get it to work. the whole process SEEMS simple enough; there's even a step-by-step process given to set it up. HOWEVER, when i tried to rig a Linux box to go through it, it wouldn't allow any traffic through. i'm not going to bother asking where i went wrong. i eventually tried to get a Linux station to do the trick, and it worked like a champ (like i didn't expect that, eh? <g>) maybe the Internet Sharing thing with Win98 is a neat idea, but if they would at least provide some more information without redefining the network terms.... wait. that would defeat the purpose, wouldn't it? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- William Smith wsmith-at-chezsmith-dot-com Fall River, MA http://www.chezsmith.com The cruelest lies are often told without a word. The kindest truths are often spoken but never heard. * TAG! v3.0 *

Sept. 29, 2002

Re: [Wlug] X tricks

by Charles R. Anderson

KDE Desktop Sharing is a RFB (VNC) server that uses your existing X session: http://www.tjansen.de/krfb/ On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 08:07:45PM -0400, brad wrote: maitre> I was wondering if there is a way to create a window that would be a tunnel maitre> into another X server. For example if i'm running a server on :0 and on :1, i maitre> would like to have a window, which is connected to :0, that would show what maitre> is being displayed on :1. -- Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886

Sept. 29, 2002

Re: [Wlug] X tricks

by Steve Freitag

How about VNC? Your native X-Server is :0 The VNCserver is :1 The VNCviewer puts up a window on :0 with the contents of the VNCserver :1? ----- Original Message ----- From: "brad" <maitre(a)ccs.neu.edu> To: <wlug(a)mail.wlug.org> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 8:07 PM Subject: [Wlug] X tricks > Hi All, > I was wondering if there is a way to create a window that would be a tunnel > into another X server. For example if i'm running a server on :0 and on :1, i > would like to have a window, which is connected to :0, that would show what > is being displayed on :1. > > This is similar to how vmware works. When you start vmware in window on :0 it > will actually start another X server on :1 and display (in a window) the > contents on :1. > > Is this possible (other then with vmware)? > > Thanks, > --brad > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Sept. 29, 2002

Re: [Wlug] X tricks

by Steve Freitag

How about VNC? Your native X-Server is :0 The VNCserver is :1 The VNCviewer puts up a window on :0 with the contents of the VNCserver :1? ----- Original Message ----- From: "brad" <maitre(a)ccs.neu.edu> To: <wlug(a)mail.wlug.org> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 8:07 PM Subject: [Wlug] X tricks > Hi All, > I was wondering if there is a way to create a window that would be a tunnel > into another X server. For example if i'm running a server on :0 and on :1, i > would like to have a window, which is connected to :0, that would show what > is being displayed on :1. > > This is similar to how vmware works. When you start vmware in window on :0 it > will actually start another X server on :1 and display (in a window) the > contents on :1. > > Is this possible (other then with vmware)? > > Thanks, > --brad > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Sept. 29, 2002

X tricks

by brad

Hi All, I was wondering if there is a way to create a window that would be a tunnel into another X server. For example if i'm running a server on :0 and on :1, i would like to have a window, which is connected to :0, that would show what is being displayed on :1. This is similar to how vmware works. When you start vmware in window on :0 it will actually start another X server on :1 and display (in a window) the contents on :1. Is this possible (other then with vmware)? Thanks, --brad

Sept. 29, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Oct 24, 2002: Install Fest !

by brad

I will. This will be a good time for that. -b On Thursday 26 September 2002 09:27 am, Wes Allen wrote: > anyone want to help me with that ipaq install then? > > WEs > > On Thursday 26 September 2002 9:18 pm, Andy Stewart wrote: > > HI Everybody, > > > > I have reserved the HIggins Labs discovery classroom (HL218?) for our > > upcoming install fest! This is scheduled for Thursday, Oct. 24, which is > > the night which was scheduled for our next WLUG meeting. I thought that > > the first week of B term would work out well for the WPI undergraduates. > > In place of the meeting, we'll have the install fest from 6:30 - 9:30 PM > > (yes, the time is earlier for this occasion). I will update the website > > shortly. > > > > If you know people who are interested in having us help them with a Linux > > installation, please ask them to send me an e-mail so I can keep track. > > We can probably accomodate folks who want us to configure something but > > I'd like to give priority to installations. Voyeurs are most welcome to > > watch and learn! > > > > Would somebody from WPILA please post this information on some > > appropriate WPI newsgroups, bulletin boards, and the like? I'd like to > > give priority to WPI students and allow "outsiders" if we have enough > > space. Remember, we have another install fest in February which is open > > to everybody. > > > > WLUG / WPILA Linux Install Fest > > Date: Thursday, Oct. 24, 2002 > > Time: 6:30 - 9:30 PM > > E-mail: andystewart(a)attbi.com > > > > Later, > > > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

Sept. 28, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Oct 24, 2002: Install Fest !

by Wes Allen

October 24th it is then! Whoopie! Wes On Saturday 28 September 2002 11:58 am, brad wrote: > I will. This will be a good time for that. > -b > > On Thursday 26 September 2002 09:27 am, Wes Allen wrote: > > anyone want to help me with that ipaq install then? > > > > WEs > > > > On Thursday 26 September 2002 9:18 pm, Andy Stewart wrote: > > > HI Everybody, > > > > > > I have reserved the HIggins Labs discovery classroom (HL218?) for our > > > upcoming install fest! This is scheduled for Thursday, Oct. 24, which > > > is the night which was scheduled for our next WLUG meeting. I thought > > > that the first week of B term would work out well for the WPI > > > undergraduates. In place of the meeting, we'll have the install fest > > > from 6:30 - 9:30 PM (yes, the time is earlier for this occasion). I > > > will update the website shortly. > > > > > > If you know people who are interested in having us help them with a > > > Linux installation, please ask them to send me an e-mail so I can keep > > > track. We can probably accomodate folks who want us to configure > > > something but I'd like to give priority to installations. Voyeurs are > > > most welcome to watch and learn! > > > > > > Would somebody from WPILA please post this information on some > > > appropriate WPI newsgroups, bulletin boards, and the like? I'd like to > > > give priority to WPI students and allow "outsiders" if we have enough > > > space. Remember, we have another install fest in February which is > > > open to everybody. > > > > > > WLUG / WPILA Linux Install Fest > > > Date: Thursday, Oct. 24, 2002 > > > Time: 6:30 - 9:30 PM > > > E-mail: andystewart(a)attbi.com > > > > > > Later, > > > > > > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wlug mailing list > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

Sept. 28, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Duel HD

by Brian J.Conway

Dueling hard drives? I would imagine the Maxtor would kick WD's ass and it would just sit in the corner clicking sadly. > I have a compaq EN pII350, I had one 40gb Maxtor hard drive installed > and suse was running fine then I added a second 40gb Western Digital > hard drive. Both of them run at 7500rpm. There are a couple of things > that seam out of wack. Firest when i install only the WD as the master > the computer only gives me the bios screne and nothing else. But when I > have After running into this two days ago, I can advise you that WD drives have different settings for single and master. I'm pretty sure they're the only IDE drives that still do this. That also explains why it works fine as the slave and the Maxtor as the master. > the SD set as slave adn the Maxtor as teh master it seams to detec both > drives. then i go through the whold Suse install. It dects both HD > drives and therwe sizes properly. After it installs and configures > everyting it starts the system is fine. The problem arizes the first > tiem you stry to restart the system. All it does is go through the BIOS > and nest it trys to start the system but all it displays is "li". > Please help I have trited many diffrent things to get it to work and am > runnig out of ideas. Check the LILO howto for what the letters mean, I assume you have the kernel placed outside of where the BIOS can read. Make sure you have the latest BIOS revision and the drive is set in LBA mode (and use GRUB, while you're at it). ;-) Brian J. Conway bconway(a)alum.wpi.edu "Any man who can drive safely while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves." - Albert Einstein

Sept. 28, 2002

hmmm

by jeff

is it just me? or are you guys seeing lots of spam mail too. just curious. -jeff

Sept. 28, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Duel HD

by Charles R. Anderson

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 07:34:37PM -0400, bryon3245(a)netzero.com wrote: bryon3245> I have a compaq EN pII350, I had one 40gb Maxtor hard drive installed and One email is enough.

Sept. 28, 2002

Duel HD

by bryon3245＠netzero.com

I have a compaq EN pII350, I had one 40gb Maxtor hard drive installed and suse was running fine then I added a second 40gb Western Digital hard drive. Both of them run at 7500rpm. There are a couple of things that seam out of wack. Firest when i install only the WD as the master the computer only gives me the bios screne and nothing else. But when I have the SD set as slave adn the Maxtor as teh master it seams to detec both drives. then i go through the whold Suse install. It dects both HD drives and therwe sizes properly. After it installs and configures everyting it starts the system is fine. The problem arizes the first tiem you stry to restart the system. All it does is go through the BIOS and nest it trys to start the system but all it displays is "li". Please help I have trited many diffrent things to get it to work and am runnig out of ideas. -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

Sept. 27, 2002

Duel HD

by bryon3245＠netzero.com

I have a compaq EN pII350, I had one 40gb Maxtor hard drive installed and suse was running fine then I added a second 40gb Western Digital hard drive. Both of them run at 7500rpm. There are a couple of things that seam out of wack. Firest when i install only the WD as the master the computer only gives me the bios screne and nothing else. But when I have the SD set as slave adn the Maxtor as teh master it seams to detec both drives. then i go through the whold Suse install. It dects both HD drives and therwe sizes properly. After it installs and configures everyting it starts the system is fine. The problem arizes the first tiem you stry to restart the system. All it does is go through the BIOS and nest it trys to start the system but all it displays is "li". Please help I have trited many diffrent things to get it to work and am runnig out of ideas. -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

Sept. 27, 2002

Duel HD

by bryon3245＠netzero.com

I have a compaq EN pII350, I had one 40gb Maxtor hard drive installed and suse was running fine then I added a second 40gb Western Digital hard drive. Both of them run at 7500rpm. There are a couple of things that seam out of wack. Firest when i install only the WD as the master the computer only gives me the bios screne and nothing else. But when I have the SD set as slave adn the Maxtor as teh master it seams to detec both drives. then i go through the whold Suse install. It dects both HD drives and therwe sizes properly. After it installs and configures everyting it starts the system is fine. The problem arizes the first tiem you stry to restart the system. All it does is go through the BIOS and nest it trys to start the system but all it displays is "li". Please help I have trited many diffrent things to get it to work and am runnig out of ideas. -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

Sept. 27, 2002

Re: [Wlug] OpenSSL!

by Keith Wright

> From: "Aramico" <aramico(a)duahati.com> > > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Ups, what have I done ?</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> You have posted (several times I think) in very ugly HTML. We mostly use Ascii on this list. Ascii is the American Standard Code for Information Interchange. True patriots will not allow an illegal monopoly to encode their words in a subversive format. -- Keith

Sept. 27, 2002