- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] I know the problem, anyone know the commands...

by Karl Hiramoto

Shouldn't the ACPI and USB be able to share an IRQ? Did you mount your devusb filesystem? On 3 Oct 2002, Wesley Allen wrote: > Hi gang, > I've tracked down my usb problem. It appears that both my acpi and usb > controllers are competing for irq 9; what I need to do is set my irq > for usb to 11 and then it should work. How do I switch irq values?? > > Wes > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > -- ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø Karl Hiramoto <karl(a)hiramoto.org> Work: 978-425-2090 ext 25 Cell: 508-517-4819 Personal web page: http://karl.hiramoto.org/ Zoop Productions: http://www.zoop.org/ KTEQ Rapid City: http://www.kteq.org/ AOL IM ID = KarlH420 Yahoo_IM = karl_hiramoto ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø It was kinda like stuffing the wrong card in a computer, when you're stickin' those artificial stimulants in your arm. -- Dion, noted computer scientist

Oct. 3, 2002

RE: [Wlug] I know the problem, anyone know the commands...

by Keller, Tim

You should be able to specify with options in the conf.modules or modules.conf when the module loads which IRQ to use. Tim. -----Original Message----- From: Wesley Allen [mailto:wallen@charter.net] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 16:16 PM To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Subject: [Wlug] I know the problem, anyone know the commands... Hi gang, I've tracked down my usb problem. It appears that both my acpi and usb controllers are competing for irq 9; what I need to do is set my irq for usb to 11 and then it should work. How do I switch irq values?? Wes _______________________________________________ Wlug mailing list Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

Oct. 3, 2002

I know the problem, anyone know the commands...

by Wesley Allen

Hi gang, I've tracked down my usb problem. It appears that both my acpi and usb controllers are competing for irq 9; what I need to do is set my irq for usb to 11 and then it should work. How do I switch irq values?? Wes

Oct. 3, 2002

The Case for Linux in Universities

by Karl Hiramoto

http://www.kegel.com/linux/edu/ -- ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø Karl Hiramoto <karl(a)hiramoto.org> Work: 978-425-2090 ext 25 Cell: 508-517-4819 Personal web page: http://karl.hiramoto.org/ Zoop Productions: http://www.zoop.org/ KTEQ Rapid City: http://www.kteq.org/ AOL IM ID = KarlH420 Yahoo_IM = karl_hiramoto ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø In short: just say NO TO DRUGS, and maybe you won't end up like the Hurd people. - Linus on MAP_COPY

Oct. 3, 2002

RE: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames

by Simoncini, Matthew

I'm sorry I didn't follow this thread from the start, but I can explain how we have Samba setup at our client site: We are running Samba 2.2.2 on the server side (Solaris 2.6 or 2.7) with mostly Windows 2000 clients connecting on the client side. When I want to map my home directory from my Windows 2000 client, I use Map Network Drive and supply the following information: Drive: <some letter> Folder: \\clemens\simoncim When I hit finish, it maps my Unix home directory without any problems.

Oct. 3, 2002

Re: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames

by Bill Mills-Curran

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Charles R. Anderson wrote: > Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:05:02 -0400 > From: Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)WPI.EDU> > Reply-To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > To: Worcester Linux Users Group <wlug(a)mail.wlug.org> > Subject: Re: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:52:23AM -0400, Bill Mills-Curran wrote: > subssn594> I'm not using a username on my win98 box. It would be too confusing > subssn594> to my "windows community" at home. > > So what username does Samba see when you map drives? You might have to > increase the debug level in smb.conf (log level = 9). > > -- > Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ > PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 > Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886 <snip> I haven't had a chance to play with the different suggestions yet -- too many distractions. One thing, though, is that I've confirmed my "senior moment"... My recollection of a place to add a username (without a username box/prompt) was completely wrong. I was remembering the WinNT method of specifying a different NT domain with the username in a username box. <sigh> I have some more ideas/requirements. 1. I'd like several shares, each mounted with a different linux/samba username, so that, when my "users" work from linux (staroffice), they have the right ownership/permissions for their files. 2. I recollect that samba has a feature that will allow the Win98 box to specify a password without a username. Samba then looks to see if the password matches from a list of username/password entries. It then allows the mount, using the username that works with the password. (Do I have this right, or is this another senior moment?) 3. Does Win98 have a "remember this password" button on the mount gui? (I'm not so much worried about security behind my firewall as much as I'd like to get the ownship of the samba-shared files right.) Thanks, Bill

Oct. 3, 2002

Re: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames

by Chuck Homic

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:43:29AM -0400, Bill Mills-Curran wrote: > I want to set up some samba shares to be mounted on my win98 box, and > I'd like to protect the shares with usernames and passwords, but I > can't remember how to specify a username from the win98 box. I seem > to remember a way by adding the username to the share spec, but I > can't find any documentation on the subject. > > Any ideas? Or should I use a different approach? If you have only 5 users, I think the simplest approach is to create a unique share for each person, so that when you go to \\server, you'll see shares for mom, dad, kid1, kid2, kid3. Each one should have an account on the linux box, and each share should have a 'force user' & 'force group' in smb.conf for their own account. That way, if you click on kid1, you have to enter kid1's password, regardless of what Win98 sends for the username. You also have to remember to uncheck 'remember password' too. -Chuck

Oct. 3, 2002

Hi all

by Wesley Allen

Hi all, I got mandrake 9.0 on my laptop (now XP-less, smile) and I love it. However, I've got two problems.... 1. My usb devices are not accepting addresses, I've got a dmesg log in a file if you want to see it. 2. I can't get tpconfig to work! Does anyone know if the patch was pre-installed for tpconfig in previous mdk's? I used to be able to install the rpm and it just worked, now it doesn't work at all (and I hate "tapping"). Thanks gang, I learn a lot from this list! Wes

Oct. 3, 2002

Re: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames

by Michael Patrick Frysinger

then try utilizing the 'guest' logon ... if that doesnt work, setup your windows machines to auto-logon as some user and use that ... tweakui (microsoft provides this for free via their website) allows you to setup users to logon automatically in win 9x -mike On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Bill Mills-Curran wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Charles R. Anderson wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:46:31 -0400 > > From: Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)WPI.EDU> > > Reply-To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > To: Worcester Linux Users Group <wlug(a)mail.wlug.org> > > Subject: Re: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames > > > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:43:29AM -0400, Bill Mills-Curran wrote: > > subssn594> Any ideas? Or should I use a different approach? > > > > Windows 95/98/Me uses the username that you logged into Windows with. > > I don't think you can override that on a per-share basis. > > > > -- > > Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ > > PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 > > Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wlug mailing list > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > I'm not using a username on my win98 box. It would be too confusing > to my "windows community" at home. > > Bill > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > >

Oct. 2, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Configuring Apache With SSL

by Michael Patrick Frysinger

check out http://www.modssl.org/ -mike On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Aramico wrote: > I've just install the latest version of openssl, now how can i get the detail information to configure it with Apache. > > Thanks,

Oct. 2, 2002

Re: [Wlug] openssl upgrade - U might b need it ;p

by Michael Patrick Frysinger

or if you're running Gentoo, `emerge -u openssl` and forget about it ;D -mike On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Frank Sweetser wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:45:01PM +0700, Aramico wrote: > > > > Just configured the openssl installation with shared (./configure > > --prefix=/YOUR_OPENSSL_DIR_TARGET --openssldir=/YOUR_OPENSSL_DIR_TARGET > > shared) That's the main idean that I would like to say, shared. > > > > It's automatically created the latest file of libcrypto.* and other its need. > > Simple, make the duplicate of the needed file and create a link from a > > defined .so as .so asked. Then, you can simply close the TELNET CONNECTION > > (using chkconfig --level 3 telnet off - Redhat) and re-enabling the ssh > > connection by typing /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd restart) > > Out of curiousity, why are you manually upgrading via tarballs when redhat > has shipped patched openssl rpms? Just do an rpm -Uvh on them, and you can > do it over an ssh connection just fine. > > -- > Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu, fs at suave.net | $ x 18 > Full-time WPI Network Engineer, Part time Linux/Perl guy | > "The inside of my head was exploding with fireworks. Fortunately, > my last thought turned out the lights when it left." > --- Calvin > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > >

Oct. 2, 2002

RE: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames

by Marc Hughes

I don't know about win98, but on 2000, when you "Map Network Drive" there's a hyperlink (yes, hyperlink... Don't ask me why it wouldn't be a button, or even better a checkbox with a slightly different program flow ... But enough of my rant about MS bad UI design) that says "Connect using a different username". If you hit that, you can specify a username when connecting. I've also noticed if I connect to \\server\hughesm (my home directory) it will ask for my username & password, I log into windows as MarcH, and then if I connect to any other share on that server it uses that name, but it only asks me for a username for my home directory... Of course this is win2k again, and we all know how consistant MS is. -Marc -----Original Message----- From: Bill Mills-Curran [mailto:subssn594@charter.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:43 AM To: Worcester Linux Users Group Subject: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames I want to set up some samba shares to be mounted on my win98 box, and I'd like to protect the shares with usernames and passwords, but I can't remember how to specify a username from the win98 box. I seem to remember a way by adding the username to the share spec, but I can't find any documentation on the subject. Any ideas? Or should I use a different approach? (I have 3 kids & a wife who are mainly windows users, but will sometimes use my linux box. I'd like them to be able to read/write their files from either machine.) TIA, Bill _______________________________________________ Wlug mailing list Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

Oct. 2, 2002

Re: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames

by Charles R. Anderson

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:52:23AM -0400, Bill Mills-Curran wrote: subssn594> I'm not using a username on my win98 box. It would be too confusing subssn594> to my "windows community" at home. So what username does Samba see when you map drives? You might have to increase the debug level in smb.conf (log level = 9). -- Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886

Oct. 2, 2002

Re: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames

by Bill Mills-Curran

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Charles R. Anderson wrote: > Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:46:31 -0400 > From: Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)WPI.EDU> > Reply-To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > To: Worcester Linux Users Group <wlug(a)mail.wlug.org> > Subject: Re: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:43:29AM -0400, Bill Mills-Curran wrote: > subssn594> Any ideas? Or should I use a different approach? > > Windows 95/98/Me uses the username that you logged into Windows with. > I don't think you can override that on a per-share basis. > > -- > Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ > PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 > Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886 > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > I'm not using a username on my win98 box. It would be too confusing to my "windows community" at home. Bill

Oct. 2, 2002

Re: [Wlug] samba shares & win98 usernames

by Charles R. Anderson

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:43:29AM -0400, Bill Mills-Curran wrote: subssn594> Any ideas? Or should I use a different approach? Windows 95/98/Me uses the username that you logged into Windows with. I don't think you can override that on a per-share basis. -- Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886

Oct. 2, 2002

samba shares & win98 usernames

by Bill Mills-Curran

I want to set up some samba shares to be mounted on my win98 box, and I'd like to protect the shares with usernames and passwords, but I can't remember how to specify a username from the win98 box. I seem to remember a way by adding the username to the share spec, but I can't find any documentation on the subject. Any ideas? Or should I use a different approach? (I have 3 kids & a wife who are mainly windows users, but will sometimes use my linux box. I'd like them to be able to read/write their files from either machine.) TIA, Bill

Oct. 2, 2002

Re: [Wlug] openssl upgrade - U might b need it ;p

by Frank Sweetser

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:45:01PM +0700, Aramico wrote: > > Just configured the openssl installation with shared (./configure > --prefix=/YOUR_OPENSSL_DIR_TARGET --openssldir=/YOUR_OPENSSL_DIR_TARGET > shared) That's the main idean that I would like to say, shared. > > It's automatically created the latest file of libcrypto.* and other its need. > Simple, make the duplicate of the needed file and create a link from a > defined .so as .so asked. Then, you can simply close the TELNET CONNECTION > (using chkconfig --level 3 telnet off - Redhat) and re-enabling the ssh > connection by typing /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd restart) Out of curiousity, why are you manually upgrading via tarballs when redhat has shipped patched openssl rpms? Just do an rpm -Uvh on them, and you can do it over an ssh connection just fine. -- Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu, fs at suave.net | $ x 18 Full-time WPI Network Engineer, Part time Linux/Perl guy | "The inside of my head was exploding with fireworks. Fortunately, my last thought turned out the lights when it left." --- Calvin

Oct. 2, 2002

Configuring Apache With SSL

by Aramico

I've just install the latest version of openssl, now how can i get the detail information to configure it with Apache. Thanks,

Oct. 2, 2002

openssl upgrade - U might b need it ;p

by Aramico

Well, about my problem in upgrading my remote server with the latest version of openssl, apache and other its need to avoid getting the error.... Just wanna tell u this, you might be need it, if not... just ignore it.... ;p Well, at the first time, before removing the available openssl, you might have to enable the TELNET CONNECTION first. It's better to completely remove the available openssl first, but remember to ENABLE THE TELNET CONNECTION first. After removing the old openssl, you can not make any other SSH connection to your remote machine. You have got to do this fast, do not let the TELNET CONNECTION enable for a long time period. Get the latest openssl in www.openssl.com, and follow the instruction. Dont be affraid of libcrypto.* proble. Just configured the openssl installation with shared (./configure --prefix=/YOUR_OPENSSL_DIR_TARGET --openssldir=/YOUR_OPENSSL_DIR_TARGET shared) That's the main idean that I would like to say, shared. It's automatically created the latest file of libcrypto.* and other its need. Simple, make the duplicate of the needed file and create a link from a defined .so as .so asked. Then, you can simply close the TELNET CONNECTION (using chkconfig --level 3 telnet off - Redhat) and re-enabling the ssh connection by typing /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd restart) Good Luck...... ;p

Oct. 2, 2002

You might be needed!

by Aramico

Well, about my problem in upgrading my remote server with the latest version of openssl, apache and other its need to avoid getting the error.... Just wanna tell u this, you might be need it, if not... just ignore it.... ;p Well, at the first time, before removing the available openssl, you might have to enable the TELNET CONNECTION first. It's better to completely remove the available openssl first, but remember to ENABLE THE TELNET CONNECTION first. After removing the old openssl, you can not make any other SSH connection to your remote machine. You have got to do this fast, do not let the TELNET CONNECTION enable for a long time period. Get the latest openssl in www.openssl.com, and follow the instruction. Dont be affraid of libcrypto.* proble. Just configured the openssl installation with shared (./configure --prefix=/YOUR_OPENSSL_DIR_TARGET --openssldir=/YOUR_OPENSSL_DIR_TARGET shared) That's the main idean that I would like to say, shared. It's automatically created the latest file of libcrypto.* and other its need. Simple, make the duplicate of the needed file and create a link from a defined .so as .so asked. Then, you can simply close the TELNET CONNECTION (using chkconfig --level 3 telnet off - Redhat) and re-enabling the ssh connection by typing /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd restart) Good Luck...... ;p

Oct. 2, 2002

Re: [Wlug] OT: MIME

by Theo Van Dinter

On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:04:57PM -0400, Chuck Homic wrote: > Keith, what mailer are you using? Maybe the folks on this list can help > you configure it correctly. On a related note, if you're interested in trimming out the alternate HTML part, take a look at http://www.kluge.net/mailfiltering/strip_html.txt ... It works very nicely for me ala: # If a message is MIME and under 100k, remove the HTML version if neccesary. :0 fw * ^Content-type:.*boundary * <102400 |/usr/local/bin/strip_html.pl Then I never worry about the multipart/alternate bits since I only ever see text/plain, not to mention that the mail is much much smaller this way. ;) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Problem solving under linux has never been the circus that it is under AIX." (By Pete Ehlke in comp.unix.aix)

Oct. 1, 2002

Re: [Wlug] OT: MIME

by Chuck Homic

On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:59:56PM -0400, Chuck Homic wrote: > What's everyone's freekin problem with MIME formatted messages? Sorry, everyone-- my mistake... I just realized it wasn't everyone at all. It was Keith every time the subject was mentioned. ;) Keith, what mailer are you using? Maybe the folks on this list can help you configure it correctly. -Chuck

Oct. 1, 2002

OT: MIME

by Chuck Homic

On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:52:56AM -0400, Keith Wright wrote: > > From: "Aramico" <aramico(a)duahati.com> > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > Bummer. Okay, flame war time, but this is really starting to bug me. What's everyone's freekin problem with MIME formatted messages? The poster's message is NOT in HTML format (referring to a previous post on the matter). It's in multipart/alternative. That means your mailer is free to choose what alternative encoding to display. I have mutt configured to show me text/html version (piped thru lynx, of course), but I could just as easily have it show me the text/plain one instead. The way I see it, giving the reader the option of what version to display is the best compromise, as compared to either A) not offering multimedia in email at all, or B) berating the sender of a message for not using a format you agree with. Using a retarded mailer that doesn't know to interpret multipart/alternative is no excuse. And jumping right to option B is just childish. -Chuck

Oct. 1, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Sendmail

by Keith Wright

> From: "Aramico" <aramico(a)duahati.com> > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Bummer. > Where can I get detail documentation about Sendmail and Qmail ? The detail about |sendmail| is in the 1021 page book called "sendmail" by Bryan Costales, published by O'Reilly. I got my copy from the Tatnuck bookstore on Chandler Street, I don't know if they are still in stock. The Border's on Rt.9 in Shrewsbury is also a good place to look. > I mean, the documentations on their site both are meaningless for me. I can't guarantee that book won't also be meaningless for you. > Well, it's all just about the the pop3, smtp, virtualhost, etc. Yeah, that's how mail gets sent and received. What are you trying to do? -- Keith

Oct. 1, 2002

RE: [Wlug] Sendmail

by Simoncini, Matthew

Sendmail by O'Reilly ISBN: 1565922220 -----Original Message----- From: Aramico [mailto:aramico@duahati.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 6:28 AM To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Subject: [Wlug] Sendmail Where can I get detail documentation about Sendmail and Qmail ? I mean, the documentations on their site both are meaningless for me. Well, it's all just about the the pop3, smtp, virtualhost, etc. Thanks!

Oct. 1, 2002