- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Peter Gutowski

Sometimes you gotta believe the error message. I've reread the mount man page and I see no reference to bsd44 as being a legal option. Have you tried issuing the command without the '-o bsd44'? On Monday, November 11, 2002 7:19 AM, Christopher B Stank <stanky(a)parrottech.net> wrote: >Greetings All! > >I am having an issue when attempting to mount a bsd44 (a freebsd >partition) under a base install of Redhat 8.0. > >The kernel is 2.4.18-14, and has loaded the ufs f/s module. > >The FAT looks like: > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System >/dev/hdc1 * 1 1912 15358108+ a5 FreeBSD >/dev/hdc2 * 1913 8796 55295730 a5 FreeBSD >/dev/hdc3 * 8797 9688 7164990 a5 FreeBSD >/dev/hdc4 * 9689 9731 345397+ a5 FreeBSD > >I have attempted to mount the hdc1 partition as follows: >mount -t ufs -o bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 > >and I get the following error: >"mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1, > or too many mounted file systems" > >Does anyone have any insight as to what I am doing wrong! Any help would >be greatly appreciated, as I need to get the data off these FreeBSD >partitions before I format them as EXT3. > >Thanks in advance! >/Chris >Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > -- Peter Gutowski <peter(a)linuxchamps.com> // tel.: (413) 531-0123 "When in company, put not your hands to any part of the body not usually discovered." --George Washington, _Rules for Civility and Decent Behavior_

Nov. 11, 2002

mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Christopher B Stank

Greetings All! I am having an issue when attempting to mount a bsd44 (a freebsd partition) under a base install of Redhat 8.0. The kernel is 2.4.18-14, and has loaded the ufs f/s module. The FAT looks like: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdc1 * 1 1912 15358108+ a5 FreeBSD /dev/hdc2 * 1913 8796 55295730 a5 FreeBSD /dev/hdc3 * 8797 9688 7164990 a5 FreeBSD /dev/hdc4 * 9689 9731 345397+ a5 FreeBSD I have attempted to mount the hdc1 partition as follows: mount -t ufs -o bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 and I get the following error: "mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1, or too many mounted file systems" Does anyone have any insight as to what I am doing wrong! Any help would be greatly appreciated, as I need to get the data off these FreeBSD partitions before I format them as EXT3. Thanks in advance! /Chris -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Christopher Bruce Stank cstank(a)nortelnetworks.com CES - Sys Test Engineering (978) 288-6185 Nortel Networks (508) 769-9664 (cel) 600 Technology Park (978) 445-5328 (pgr) M/S E65/60/301 (978) 288-4004 (fax) Billerica, MA 01821 248-6185 (esn)

Nov. 11, 2002

How to setup Samba

by Pierce Barnard

Hello, I am trying to configure Samba on my Suse Box to share files with my Windows ME box. Is there a webpage or document that I can use to set up Samba?

Nov. 11, 2002

RE: [Wlug] How to setup Samba

by Steve Freitag

http://www.suse.de/us/private/support/howto/samba/ http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba.html

Nov. 11, 2002

Re: [Wlug] How to setup Samba

by Karl Hiramoto

http://samba.org/ or http://tldp.org/ On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Pierce Barnard wrote: > Hello, I am trying to configure Samba on my Suse Box to share files with my > Windows ME box. Is there a webpage or document that I can use to set up Samba? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > -- ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø Karl Hiramoto <karl(a)hiramoto.org> Work: 978-425-2090 ext 25 Cell: 508-517-4819 Personal web page: http://karl.hiramoto.org/ Freedom: http://www.technojihad.com/ Zoop Productions: http://www.zoop.org/ KTEQ Rapid City: http://www.kteq.org/ AOL IM ID = KarlH420 Yahoo_IM = karl_hiramoto ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø Better hope you get what you want before you stop wanting it.

Nov. 11, 2002

RE: [Wlug] Routing problem -can I believe the ISP tech? #2

by George Metz

> Well, the problem was in the firewall, but it doesn't explain > EVERYTHING that happened. > > After two hours on the phone Mon afternoon with Qwest tech support > level 2, they insisted I try ping/traceroute with the firewall > disabled. Pings moved through as expected ...hmmmm Heh. Wierd. Glad to see you got it up and running though. On the e-mail question, I've no clue unless they're all using the same hostnames; in which case, it's probably due to something along the lines of relaying being denied. As to the question of why you had connectivity for that two hours, it IS really wierd, but it's possible that the firewall wasn't running at home when you made the changes, or that for some odd reason it hadn't included the rc.firewall.blocked script upon restart... (Okay, stabbing in the dark there.) George

Nov. 9, 2002

RE: [Wlug] Procmail Question

by Marc Hughes

OK, spamassasin looks pretty damned cool ... I love the "reasons" why something is spam. -Marc SPAM: Content analysis details: (8.10 hits, 5 required) SPAM: TO_NO_USER (1.7 points) To: has no local-part before @ sign SPAM: SMTPD_IN_RCVD (1.2 points) Received via SMTPD32 server (SMTPD32-n.n) SPAM: X_PRIORITY_HIGH (0.4 points) Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high SPAM: X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH (0.4 points) Sent with 'X-Msmail-Priority' set to high SPAM: USER_AGENT_OE (0.2 points) X-Mailer header indicates a non-spam MUA (Outlook Express) SPAM: ACT_NOW (0.3 points) BODY: Act Now! Don't Hesitate! SPAM: EXCUSE_14 (0.2 points) BODY: Tells you how to stop further spam SPAM: EXCUSE_1 (0.1 points) BODY: Gives an excuse about why you were sent this spam SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_03_05 (1.1 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 03 to 05 (medium) SPAM: [score: 3] SPAM: BIG_FONT (0.3 points) BODY: FONT Size +2 and up or 3 and up SPAM: HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR (0.3 points) BODY: HTML mail with non-white background SPAM: HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED (0.3 points) BODY: HTML font color is red SPAM: HTML_50_70 (0.3 points) BODY: Message is 50-70% HTML tags SPAM: HTML_FONT_COLOR_NOHASH (0.2 points) BODY: HTML font color is missing hash ( SPAM: HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE (0.2 points) BODY: HTML font color is blue SPAM: MISSING_MIMEOLE (0.5 points) Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE SPAM: CTYPE_JUST_HTML (0.4 points) HTML-only mail, with no text version -----Original Message----- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@kluge.net] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:13 AM To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Subject: Re: [Wlug] Procmail Question On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:07:37AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > :0: > * 1^1 ^From.*jenny(a)axte84\.com > * 1^1 ^Subject.*MILLION OPT-IN EMAIL ADDRESSES > Badspam Oops, slight update: :0: * 1^0 ^From.*jenny(a)axte84\.com * 1^0 ^Subject.*MILLION OPT-IN EMAIL ADDRESSES Badspam I believe they'd be functionally equivilent for you, but the first one keeps looking for matches after the first hit. The second one stops at 1 hit, so it's more efficient. :) There's a nice discussion about this stuff at: http://www.rosat.mpe-garching.mpg.de/mailing-lists/procmail/1998-01/msg0 0335.html :) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "This is a beta release of Red Hat Linux. It is not intended for mission critical applications. It's not even intended for non-mission critical applications. Important data should not be entrusted to Wolverine, as it may eat it and make loud belching noises." - RedHat Beta release "Wolverine"

Nov. 8, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Procmail Question

by Charles R. Anderson

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:48:14AM -0500, Marc Hughes wrote: HughesM> This will do an AND between the two conditions ... Is there an easy way HughesM> to OR between them? ... Or do I need to make a separate rule for each HughesM> and every condition? And an even further note... What are the thoughts HughesM> on some of these anti-spam tools that work with procmail? Any HughesM> favorites? They are just perl regexps, so you can use '|' * (^From.*jenny(a)axte84\.com)|(^Subject.*MILLION OPT-IN EMAIL ADDRESSES) Another useful feature is the 'E'lse tag, which executes only if the previous rule did NOT match: :0: * ^From: president(a)whitehouse.gov vip :0E: non-vip -- Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886

Nov. 8, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Procmail Question

by Theo Van Dinter

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:07:37AM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > :0: > * 1^1 ^From.*jenny(a)axte84\.com > * 1^1 ^Subject.*MILLION OPT-IN EMAIL ADDRESSES > Badspam Oops, slight update: :0: * 1^0 ^From.*jenny(a)axte84\.com * 1^0 ^Subject.*MILLION OPT-IN EMAIL ADDRESSES Badspam I believe they'd be functionally equivilent for you, but the first one keeps looking for matches after the first hit. The second one stops at 1 hit, so it's more efficient. :) There's a nice discussion about this stuff at: http://www.rosat.mpe-garching.mpg.de/mailing-lists/procmail/1998-01/msg0033… :) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "This is a beta release of Red Hat Linux. It is not intended for mission critical applications. It's not even intended for non-mission critical applications. Important data should not be entrusted to Wolverine, as it may eat it and make loud belching noises." - RedHat Beta release "Wolverine"

Nov. 8, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Procmail Question

by Theo Van Dinter

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:48:14AM -0500, Marc Hughes wrote: > :0: > * ^From.*jenny(a)axte84\.com > * ^Subject.*MILLION OPT-IN EMAIL ADDRESSES > Badspam > > This will do an AND between the two conditions ... Is there an easy way > to OR between them? ... Or do I need to make a separate rule for each There's a way, although it's really not straightforward... One of my old procmail-only anti-spam rules looked for 8-bit chars in the body: :0BDfh * -1^1 . * 2^1 =[0-9A-F][0-9A-F] * 20^1 [��] * 20^1 [��] * 20^1 [��] * 20^1 =[A-F][0-9A-F] | formail -A "X-Reject: Too many foreign charcters." (from http://www.vex.net/~wadialix/email/chinese/link.html) Which basically says that for any 8 bit char, add 20 "points" to the rule. If there's a quoted-printable char (=XX), add 2 points, and for anything else add -1 points. As long as the rule scores 1+ points (ie: it's positive), it matches. So an or for you would be: :0: * 1^1 ^From.*jenny(a)axte84\.com * 1^1 ^Subject.*MILLION OPT-IN EMAIL ADDRESSES Badspam I belive, haven't tested it. :) Look at the procmailsc man page for more info. > and every condition? And an even further note... What are the thoughts > on some of these anti-spam tools that work with procmail? Any > favorites? SpamAssassin, hands down. :) http://www.spamassassin.org/ Sucessfully catches >98% of the spam I receive, currently at ~2100 a month (with ~5000 blocked at the SMTP level, grrr, stupid spammers!) I used to do a lot of procmail stuff, and now it's just SA. (warning: I'm a SA developer, so I'm a little biased. ;)) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "It's always darkest before dawn. So if you're going to steal your neighbour's newspaper, that's the time to do it." - Zen Musings

Nov. 8, 2002

RE: [Wlug] Procmail Question

by Marc Hughes

With the locking (:0:) all seems to work now. I'm guessing it's because I have an IMAP connection open to the mailbox while I receive the new email and it get's processed. While we're talking about procmail... A second question: :0: * ^From.*jenny(a)axte84\.com * ^Subject.*MILLION OPT-IN EMAIL ADDRESSES Badspam This will do an AND between the two conditions ... Is there an easy way to OR between them? ... Or do I need to make a separate rule for each and every condition? And an even further note... What are the thoughts on some of these anti-spam tools that work with procmail? Any favorites? Thanks a lot guys, -Marc -----Original Message----- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@kluge.net] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:21 AM To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Subject: Re: [Wlug] Procmail Question On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:13:18AM -0500, Peter Gutowski wrote: > According to the man page the second ":" is optional, i.e. > > :0: > > but, as a sample of something known to work (from the SpamAssassin > sample .procmailrc) it does use the above syntax. Here's the example: > > So maybe the second ":" is not optional all the time? Just so we're all clear, the second ":" tells procmail that is needs to lock the file before writing to avoid corrupted mailboxes. So it's a good idea if you're writing to a mailbox, but isn't actually required, especially if you're writing to /dev/null or something. I didn't see anything wrong offhand with the procmail rules shown. Can we see the header of an example mail which doesn't work with the original but works with the carbon copy method? (and by work, just to double check, we're talking about the message going into the "test" folder). -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "When it is not necessary to make a decision, it is necessary not to make a decision." - From www.slashdot.org

Nov. 8, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Procmail Question

by Theo Van Dinter

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:13:18AM -0500, Peter Gutowski wrote: > According to the man page the second ":" is optional, i.e. > > :0: > > but, as a sample of something known to work (from the SpamAssassin sample .procmailrc) it does use the above syntax. Here's the example: > > So maybe the second ":" is not optional all the time? Just so we're all clear, the second ":" tells procmail that is needs to lock the file before writing to avoid corrupted mailboxes. So it's a good idea if you're writing to a mailbox, but isn't actually required, especially if you're writing to /dev/null or something. I didn't see anything wrong offhand with the procmail rules shown. Can we see the header of an example mail which doesn't work with the original but works with the carbon copy method? (and by work, just to double check, we're talking about the message going into the "test" folder). -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "When it is not necessary to make a decision, it is necessary not to make a decision." - From www.slashdot.org

Nov. 8, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Procmail Question

by jkinz＠rcn.com

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 08:45:58AM -0500, Marc Hughes wrote: > I have a procmail question.... I have this rule: > I dpn't know if this is the problem , but you're missing the ending colon on the first line of this provcmail rule. :-) > :0 > * ^From:.*hughesm@tomsnyder.com > test Instead of : > :0 Try: > :0 : -- Jeff Kinz, Emergent Research, Hudson, MA. "jkinz(a)ultranet.com" "jkinz(a)rcn.com" copyright 2002. Use is restricted. Any use is an acceptance of the offer at http://users.rcn.com/jkinz/policy.html. (o- -o) //\ eLviintuaxbilse /\\ V_/_ _\_V

Nov. 8, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Procmail Question

by Peter Gutowski

According to the man page the second ":" is optional, i.e. :0: but, as a sample of something known to work (from the SpamAssassin sample .procmailrc) it does use the above syntax. Here's the example: # Mails with a score of 15 or higher are almost certainly spam (with 0.05% # false positives according to rules/STATISTICS.txt). Let's put them in a # different mbox. (This one is optional.) :0: * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* mail/almost-certainly-spam The above *does* work on my system (RHL8.0). So maybe the second ":" is not optional all the time? HTH, Peter On Friday, November 8, 2002 8:45 AM, Marc Hughes <HughesM(a)tomsnyder.com> wrote: >I have a procmail question.... I have this rule: > >:0 >* ^From:.*hughesm@tomsnyder.com >test > >That doesn't seem to work. But this rule... > >:0c >* ^From:.*hughesm@tomsnyder.com >test > >... Works just fine ... But I want the first rule, I don't want it to >copy (what the :0c does) I want it to move (:0) Am I doing something >wrong? > >Thanks! >-Marc > >_______________________________________________ >Wlug mailing list >Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > -- Peter Gutowski <peter(a)linuxchamps.com> // tel.: (413) 531-0123 "When in company, put not your hands to any part of the body not usually discovered." --George Washington, _Rules for Civility and Decent Behavior_

Nov. 8, 2002

Procmail Question

by Marc Hughes

I have a procmail question.... I have this rule: :0 * ^From:.*hughesm@tomsnyder.com test That doesn't seem to work. But this rule... :0c * ^From:.*hughesm@tomsnyder.com test ... Works just fine ... But I want the first rule, I don't want it to copy (what the :0c does) I want it to move (:0) Am I doing something wrong? Thanks! -Marc

Nov. 8, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Kevin Mitnick speaking at Marlboro Softpro tonight...

by Gary Hanley

On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Clint Moyer wrote: > I'm more interested in the November 20th speaker who's the > author of the best Unix book ever. (Now in it's 3rd > edition.) I haven't seen the new edition but I have the 2nd, and while it's a certainly good book I think that the purple book is more comprehensive. Hell, it has four authors! -- Gary

Nov. 8, 2002

RE: [Wlug] x86 emulation/vmare clone

by Steve Freitag

> From: Keith Wright > > Depending on what you're trying to do, you might also want > > to check out Cygwin: http://www.cygwin.com/ > > > > "Cygwin is a UNIX environment, developed by Red Hat, for Windows." > > Well that's in quotes, so it's just a character string, > but lest somebody mistake it for an assertion... [ rant/history lesson deleted for those with slow modems :-) ] For the curious, the quotes were indicating a direct quote from (the top of) http://www.cygwin.com Perhaps not the best choice of wording... considering all the individuals (besides Red Hat/Cygnus) who have helped make cygwin possible. For even earlier history of GNU software on DOS check here: http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/history.html http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/doc/eli-m17n99.html

Nov. 8, 2002

Re: [Wlug] gnome desktop menus?

by Frank Sweetser

On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:47:48PM -0500, Baris Hasdemir wrote: > hi again, > > This is strange because gmenu is one of the core programs of gnome. Of gnome v1, yes - not of gnome v2. I actually haven't yet found a way to get equivalent functionality out of gnome v2... -- Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu, fs at suave.net | $ x 18 Full-time WPI Network Engineer, Part time Linux/Perl guy | There are no threads in a.b.p.erotica, so there's no gain in using a threaded news reader. (Unknown source)

Nov. 8, 2002

Re: [Wlug] gnome desktop menus?

by Baris Hasdemir

hi again, This is strange because gmenu is one of the core programs of gnome. But you can do this way too. those entries on the panel are some .desktop files and here is what Internet/Galeon.desktop entry has in it: penguen@penguen:~$ cat /usr/share/gnome/apps/Internet/galeon.desktop [Desktop Entry] Name=Galeon Comment=Galeon Web Browser Exec=galeon Terminal=0 Type=Application Icon=galeon.png penguen@penguen:~$ Name and Exec entries are enough, though. simply creating a .desktop file in the directory (in my case /usr/share/gnome/apps) will put a new entry on the panel menu. best wishes, baris On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:40:21 -0500 (EST) Bill Mills-Curran wrote: > Baris, > > I can't find any gmenu command or file in the Red Hat distro. > > Thanks, > Bill >

Nov. 7, 2002

Re: [Wlug] gnome desktop menus?

by Bill Mills-Curran

Baris, I can't find any gmenu command or file in the Red Hat distro. Thanks, Bill On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Baris Hasdemir wrote: > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:20:41 -0500 > From: Baris Hasdemir <penguen(a)hasdemir.com> > Reply-To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > Subject: Re: [Wlug] gnome desktop menus? > > hi, > > did you try > $ gmenu > and > # gmenu > > best wishes, > baris > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:04:38 -0500 (EST) > Bill Mills-Curran wrote: > > > I've installed RedHat 8.0 on my system, and I've decided to finally > > wean myself from fvwm2 and use the default setup. I've been poking > > around trying to figure out how to add entries to the panel menus. > > There doesn't seem to be a gui interface to do it. (There is a gui to > > add stuff to the desktop and to the panel, but not the menus.) I > > suspect that the secret handshake is contained in /etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/ > > directories, but I haven't found the secret decoder ring to help > > figure out the right way to do this. > > > > My main motivation is to add some favorite applications to the menus > > for my family. They are not about to use the command line. > > > > Does anyone have any suggestions? > > > > TIA, > > Bill > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wlug mailing list > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Nov. 7, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Kevin Mitnick speaking at Marlboro Softpro tonight...

by Wesley Allen

YES!!! On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 10:00, Keller, Tim wrote: > A buddy of mine just let me know that Kevin Mitnick will be speaking at > Softpro books in Marlboro @6:30pm. > > Thought you might find that tidbit a bit interesting... > > Tim. > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Nov. 7, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Kevin Mitnick speaking at Marlboro Softpro tonight...

by Clint Moyer

I'm more interested in the November 20th speaker who's the author of the best Unix book ever. (Now in it's 3rd edition.) http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/esa3/ On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:04:05 -0500 (EST) Michelle Vadeboncoeur <mrv(a)kluge.net> wrote: >On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Keller, Tim wrote: > >KT> A buddy of mine just let me know that Kevin Mitnick >will be speaking at >KT> Softpro books in Marlboro @6:30pm. > >http://www.softpro.com/events.html > >You can also subscribe to Softpro Book's email >notification list of >upcoming events on that page... > > > >_______________________________________________ >Wlug mailing list >Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > <TEXTAREA NAME="Signature" ROWS="4" COLS="60">

Nov. 7, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Kevin Mitnick speaking at Marlboro Softpro tonight...

by Karl Hiramoto

I went to see him Last night in Burlington. It was very interesting. I would recommend anyone who follows the hacker culture to go. The "lost chapter" of his book that was removed prior to publishing is at: http://wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,56187,00.html Mitnick links: http://www.albany.net/~dsissman/mitnick.html or just go to google and search Kevin Mitnick. On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Michelle Vadeboncoeur wrote: > On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Keller, Tim wrote: > > KT> A buddy of mine just let me know that Kevin Mitnick will be speaking at > KT> Softpro books in Marlboro @6:30pm. > > http://www.softpro.com/events.html > > You can also subscribe to Softpro Book's email notification list of > upcoming events on that page... > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > -- ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø Karl Hiramoto <karl(a)hiramoto.org> Work: 978-425-2090 ext 25 Cell: 508-517-4819 Personal web page: http://karl.hiramoto.org/ Freedom: http://www.technojihad.com/ Zoop Productions: http://www.zoop.org/ KTEQ Rapid City: http://www.kteq.org/ AOL IM ID = KarlH420 Yahoo_IM = karl_hiramoto ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø I'll be Grateful when they're Dead.

Nov. 7, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Kevin Mitnick speaking at Marlboro Softpro tonight...

by Michelle Vadeboncoeur

On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Keller, Tim wrote: KT> A buddy of mine just let me know that Kevin Mitnick will be speaking at KT> Softpro books in Marlboro @6:30pm. http://www.softpro.com/events.html You can also subscribe to Softpro Book's email notification list of upcoming events on that page...

Nov. 7, 2002

Kevin Mitnick speaking at Marlboro Softpro tonight...

by Keller, Tim

A buddy of mine just let me know that Kevin Mitnick will be speaking at Softpro books in Marlboro @6:30pm. Thought you might find that tidbit a bit interesting... Tim.

Nov. 7, 2002