- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

DVD writer

by Robert L Krawitz

I'm thinking of getting a DVD writer. My primary intention is to use it for system backups; CD's just don't cut it any more (with about 18 GB and 11 GB respectively on my two systems). The Sony DRU-500A looks like a rather interesting one, supporting a lot of formats. Any comments on that vs. any of the others out there? This is for a pure Linux system. -- Robert Krawitz <rlk(a)alum.mit.edu> Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf(a)uunet.uu.net Project lead for Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton

Nov. 23, 2002

RE: [Wlug] Partition left 7 Gbs!

by dibb_jim＠emc.com

You are probably seeing the difference between 80 * 10^9 representation and 80 * 2^30 representation of GB. An "80 GB" drive usually is seen by an OS as having ~73 GB of space. But without stating why you think so, it's difficult to tell for sure. -----Original Message----- From: Aramico To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Sent: 11/21/02 7:37 AM Subject: [Wlug] Partition left 7 Gbs! Hi all, I've got a Baracuda 7200 RPM 80 Gbs Seagate. I've creating the partition using fdisk on Linux RedHat. Why does it always leave 7 Gbs that not partitioned ? So, Here I have 7 Gbs space useless :( Any idea to solve this ? Thanks, _______________________________________________ Wlug mailing list Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

Nov. 21, 2002

Partition left 7 Gbs!

by Aramico

Hi all, I've got a Baracuda 7200 RPM 80 Gbs Seagate. I've creating the partition using fdisk on Linux RedHat. Why does it always leave 7 Gbs that not partitioned ? So, Here I have 7 Gbs space useless :( Any idea to solve this ? Thanks,

Nov. 21, 2002

Re: [Wlug] [Fwd: Clarify: GRUB setup on RAID1]

by Charles R. Anderson

On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:18:01PM -0500, Brett Russ wrote: icycle> The goal is to get rid of the separate (non-RAID) /boot partition OR icycle> make the /boot partition into a RAID1. Either one would require GRUB to icycle> read from it successfully. That works, yes. -- Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886

Nov. 20, 2002

Re: [Wlug] [Fwd: Clarify: GRUB setup on RAID1]

by Brett Russ

Charles R. Anderson wrote: > There are multiple RAID1 partitions on two disks, and grub is installed > to /dev/sda. I don't believe grub is mirrored across disks, though. > Since software RAID on Linux works partition-by-partition, and not on > whole disks, I don't see how you could automatically mirror the MBR > across disks. You could install grub to multiple MBR's, though, one for > each disk. It wouldn't gain you anything unless your BIOS can boot from > the other disks, though. To clarify my question, I wanted to make sure GRUB has the capability to access (for example) /boot/grub/grub.conf if /boot is not a separate partition but rather part of / which is a RAID1. As far as I know, RAID1 configured units are very similar to standard filesystems except in the superblock. It is difference between similar and the same that worries me. The goal is to get rid of the separate (non-RAID) /boot partition OR make the /boot partition into a RAID1. Either one would require GRUB to read from it successfully. thanks! Brett

Nov. 20, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Sar for Linux

by Adam Keck

I am going to try this. Thanks very much! -Adam On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Brian J. Conway wrote: > > Those of you who use Solaris or AIX have access to a system statistics > > tool, sar. Is there any equivalent tool for Linux? > > I used Sysstat (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/sebastien.godard/) when I was > doing my MQP involving queue management with a Linux router, it's quite > good. > > -b > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > "lingua machinationis creo, ergo sum" _____________________________________________ Adam Keck The Mathworks 508-647-7298 Natick, Ma www.mathworks.com FreeNIX/Backup/Unix Administrator _____________________________________________

Nov. 20, 2002

Re: [Wlug] [Fwd: Clarify: GRUB setup on RAID1]

by Charles R. Anderson

icycle> I looked through all of the archives on this list as well as google icycle> searching for help. I want to make sure that GRUB supports installation icycle> on RAID1 (mirror) units. I have seen several methods to do this: Well, on a Red Hat system I have here, this works fine: #boot=/dev/sda default=0 timeout=10 #splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz title Red Hat Linux (2.4.9-34enterprise) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.4.9-34enterprise ro root=/dev/md3 console=ttyS0,9600n8 initrd /initrd-2.4.9-34enterprise.img There are multiple RAID1 partitions on two disks, and grub is installed to /dev/sda. I don't believe grub is mirrored across disks, though. Since software RAID on Linux works partition-by-partition, and not on whole disks, I don't see how you could automatically mirror the MBR across disks. You could install grub to multiple MBR's, though, one for each disk. It wouldn't gain you anything unless your BIOS can boot from the other disks, though. -- Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/ PGP Key ID: 49BB5886 Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886

Nov. 20, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Sar for Linux

by Brian J. Conway

> Those of you who use Solaris or AIX have access to a system statistics > tool, sar. Is there any equivalent tool for Linux? I used Sysstat (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/sebastien.godard/) when I was doing my MQP involving queue management with a Linux router, it's quite good. -b

Nov. 20, 2002

RE: [Wlug] Sar for Linux

by Keller, Tim

I'm not sure what distro your using, but my Redhat 7.3 box has sar installed. Tim. "It's pretty hard to 'Rage Against The Machine' when you work for the Sony Corporation" -- funny slashdot sig. -----Original Message----- From: Adam Keck [mailto:akeck@mathworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 15:25 PM To: WLUG List Subject: [Wlug] Sar for Linux Those of you who use Solaris or AIX have access to a system statistics tool, sar. Is there any equivalent tool for Linux? -Adam "lingua machinationis creo, ergo sum" _____________________________________________ Adam Keck The Mathworks 508-647-7298 Natick, Ma www.mathworks.com FreeNIX/Backup/Unix Administrator _____________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Wlug mailing list Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

Nov. 20, 2002

Sar for Linux

by Adam Keck

Those of you who use Solaris or AIX have access to a system statistics tool, sar. Is there any equivalent tool for Linux? -Adam "lingua machinationis creo, ergo sum" _____________________________________________ Adam Keck The Mathworks 508-647-7298 Natick, Ma www.mathworks.com FreeNIX/Backup/Unix Administrator _____________________________________________

Nov. 20, 2002

[Fwd: Clarify: GRUB setup on RAID1]

by Brett Russ

Can anyone on this list shed some light on my question below? Thanks, Brett -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Clarify: GRUB setup on RAID1 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:34:03 -0500 From: Brett Russ <icycle(a)charter.net> To: bug-grub(a)gnu.org I looked through all of the archives on this list as well as google searching for help. I want to make sure that GRUB supports installation on RAID1 (mirror) units. I have seen several methods to do this: Method 1) device (hd0) /dev/hde root (hd0,0) install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0,0) /boot/grub/stage2 0x8000 (hd0,0)/boot/grub/menu.lst install /boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) /boot/grub/stage2 0x8000 (hd0,0)/boot/grub/menu.lst device (hd0) /dev/hdg root (hd0,0) install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0,0) /boot/grub/stage2 0x8000 (hd0,0)/boot/grub/menu.lst install /boot/grub/stage1 d (hd0) /boot/grub/stage2 0x8000 (hd0,0)/boot/grub/menu.lst ...and so on for each device--substituting each additional RAID1 member drive in the /dev/hdX line. Method 2) echo '(hd0) /dev/md0' > /boot/grub/device.map grub-install '(hd0)' ...and so on for each (hd#) that is part of the md. Method 3) root (hd0,0) setup (hd0) ...and so on for each hd# present in the RAID1. My question is whether the /dev/hdX syntax or /dev/md# or (hd#) syntax is correct and what the significance of the value 0x8000 for the Stage 2 load address. It certainly seems like method 3 is the cleanest. And, are any of these methods considered better than the others? Thanks, Brett _______________________________________________ Bug-grub mailing list Bug-grub(a)gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub

Nov. 20, 2002

Re: [Wlug] REMINDER: Meeting Wed. Nov. 20, 7 PM

by Scott Venier

On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Andy Stewart wrote: > a) Does anybody want to demo their scanner under Linux? How about a live > install of SANE ? > OK. I"ll bite. I've got an HP OfficeJet K60 that works quite nicely under SANE. I'm afraid the demo of installing would be a bit boring... printing worked out of the box with redhat 7.3, and scanning required installing 1 rpm. I've been playing with a CGI to make scanning a bit more streamlined (and something that I can do from work when I don't feel like working). It's still a work in progress, but I can show it off too. All this and we should still be able to hit the Boytan by 7:30. :) Scott

Nov. 18, 2002

RE: [Wlug] REMINDER: Meeting Wed. Nov. 20, 7 PM

by Skip Gaede

Andy wrote: > This is a reminder about the upcoming WLUG meeting, to be > held on Wednesday, > November 20, 2002 at 7:00 PM in Kinnicutt Hall at WPI in > Worcester, MA. > > I'm open for topics to be discussed at this meeting. > Ideally, I'm hoping > somebody will volunteer at the last minute to talk to the > group about some > topic of interest. > e) LTSP - this one might be a bit involved if the demo was > from scratch, and > would involve around 2 or 3 computers to be useful. Does > anybody have any > experience with this? > > f) Do you have other ideas? Let the group know what they are! Hi Andy, I have, and can demo LTSP, as well as using sockets in a Linux/ Win4Lin environment to do distributed, Linux/Windows batch jobs (I have a batch job that runs perl under Linux (requires too much memory for win4lin) and three windows programs under win4lin in order to convert RTF to ThML). Rob Bellville has some Macs running LTSP at the Millbury HS, and said he'd be willing to host a WLUG meeting at the school so we could have a hands-on demo. Unfortunately, I have aconflict on Wednesdays, so can only make the Thursday meetings. Perhaps at a future date we can work something out. --Skip

Nov. 17, 2002

Re: [Wlug] REMINDER: Meeting Wed. Nov. 20, 7 PM

by Wesley Allen

I know, I know, I never come to the meetings; but I'll put in a couple of sugguestions.... How about a demo of one of the open-source pvr projects? If anyone has worked with one, that is... ***OR*** I wonder if a "patch-night" would be fun. Take a vanilla kernel, have everyone bring in their favorite patches; and people can build a custom super-kernel..... Need acpi? no problem. Need supermount? no problem (I'm a mandrake loser, sue me) Win4lin? Sure! Tpconfig? Got it right here! AMD Chip? we're compiling now Was that for PPC? Right this way.... And so on. The more I read kernel lists and such, the more I realize that I don't know half of the great kernel-patches out there; this might be a fun way to learn... Just an idea.... Wes On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 21:48, Andy Stewart wrote: > > HI everybody, > > This is a reminder about the upcoming WLUG meeting, to be held on Wednesday, > November 20, 2002 at 7:00 PM in Kinnicutt Hall at WPI in Worcester, MA. > > I'm open for topics to be discussed at this meeting. Ideally, I'm hoping > somebody will volunteer at the last minute to talk to the group about some > topic of interest. Surprisingly enough, this happens frequently and works > out well when all is said and done, so I'm not in a panic (yet). My only > problem with this is that some folks come to a meeting only if the topic is > announced in advance and it is of interest to them. > > So, what do you say, gang? Here are some ideas which I had: > > a) Does anybody want to demo their scanner under Linux? How about a live > install of SANE ? > > b) Linux software for (grand)kids - I"ve seen TuxPaint and KTuberling, there > must be others. Inquiring kids want to know! > > c) TiVO - doesn't that run Linux? Can you do any interesting hacks to the > Linux software that could be demonstrated at our meeting? > > d) MAME - some guys at work built a MAME machine. Maybe you did, too? Tell > us about it, or better yet, bring the machine to the meeting. > > e) LTSP - this one might be a bit involved if the demo was from scratch, and > would involve around 2 or 3 computers to be useful. Does anybody have any > experience with this? > > f) Do you have other ideas? Let the group know what they are! > > The "live demo" meetings have been well received in the past, especially if > some problem crops up during the demo (which makes us demo folks squirm > uncomfortably, to the amusement of the audience!). > > I hope somebody volunteers to speak at the next meeting. It'll be pretty > boring otherwise, and nobody wants that to be the case. I've been working > flat out for the last couple of months and have no time to prepare anything > for ths meeting. > > If you want to volunteer, send me or the group e-mail ASAP. You'll be glad > you did. :-) > > Thanks! > > Andy > > -- > Andy Stewart, Founder > Worcester Linux Users' Group > Worcester, MA USA > http://www.wlug.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Nov. 17, 2002

Re: [Wlug] REMINDER: Meeting Wed. Nov. 20, 7 PM

by Theo Van Dinter

On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 09:48:23PM -0500, Andy Stewart wrote: > c) TiVO - doesn't that run Linux? Can you do any interesting hacks to the > Linux software that could be demonstrated at our meeting? Well, I won't be able to make the meeting, but if you want to see a little hack I did to my TiVo (yes, it runs Linux on a PPC processor), you can look at my homepage: http://www.kluge.net/~felicity/ It tells you what my TiVo is currently watching, as well as the listing of what it will be recording (todo), what's available to watch (now showing), and programs we told it to record (season passes). All the programming is done in TCL. I use the tivoweb software, which is essentially a webserver that interfaces with the TiVo data. I wrote/hacked together a few modules that grabs the information from the TiVo and spits it out in an easily parsible format. My linux server then grabs periodically via cron that information and puts it on the web server. :) There are some other standard modules that let you control the TiVo via web browser, etc. I really just like the fact that it uses my home broadband connection to get the daily information instead of the usual dial-up via modem. ;) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: They can always run stderr through uniq. :-) -- Larry Wall in <199704012331.PAA16535(a)wall.org>

Nov. 17, 2002

REMINDER: Meeting Wed. Nov. 20, 7 PM

by Andy Stewart

HI everybody, This is a reminder about the upcoming WLUG meeting, to be held on Wednesday, November 20, 2002 at 7:00 PM in Kinnicutt Hall at WPI in Worcester, MA. I'm open for topics to be discussed at this meeting. Ideally, I'm hoping somebody will volunteer at the last minute to talk to the group about some topic of interest. Surprisingly enough, this happens frequently and works out well when all is said and done, so I'm not in a panic (yet). My only problem with this is that some folks come to a meeting only if the topic is announced in advance and it is of interest to them. So, what do you say, gang? Here are some ideas which I had: a) Does anybody want to demo their scanner under Linux? How about a live install of SANE ? b) Linux software for (grand)kids - I"ve seen TuxPaint and KTuberling, there must be others. Inquiring kids want to know! c) TiVO - doesn't that run Linux? Can you do any interesting hacks to the Linux software that could be demonstrated at our meeting? d) MAME - some guys at work built a MAME machine. Maybe you did, too? Tell us about it, or better yet, bring the machine to the meeting. e) LTSP - this one might be a bit involved if the demo was from scratch, and would involve around 2 or 3 computers to be useful. Does anybody have any experience with this? f) Do you have other ideas? Let the group know what they are! The "live demo" meetings have been well received in the past, especially if some problem crops up during the demo (which makes us demo folks squirm uncomfortably, to the amusement of the audience!). I hope somebody volunteers to speak at the next meeting. It'll be pretty boring otherwise, and nobody wants that to be the case. I've been working flat out for the last couple of months and have no time to prepare anything for ths meeting. If you want to volunteer, send me or the group e-mail ASAP. You'll be glad you did. :-) Thanks! Andy -- Andy Stewart, Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group Worcester, MA USA http://www.wlug.org

Nov. 17, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Kevin Mitnick speaking at Marlboro Softpro tonight...

by Gary Hanley

On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Keith Wright wrote: > I once went to the library at the company I worked for and asked > for help finding a book. I told the librarian the color of the > book and even stated the main theorem of chapter two. Since she > was paid to be friendly and helpful to the engineers, she did > not tell me to bugger off, but I did not like the look she gave > me. To avoid a repeat of that experience, maybe you could > divulge the title? Sorry, it sticks out like a sore thumb in any section of UNIX books so I assumed it was widely known. (There's also a Linux-only version from the same people, but I'll bet its just a reprint of all the Linux stuff from the purple book.) Go to Amazon.com and search for "UNIX System Administration Handbook". -- Gary

Nov. 14, 2002

Re: [Wlug] Kevin Mitnick speaking at Marlboro Softpro tonight...

by Keith Wright

> From: Gary Hanley <gary(a)hanley.net> > > I haven't seen the new edition but I have the 2nd, and while it's a > certainly good book I think that the purple book is more comprehensive. I once went to the library at the company I worked for and asked for help finding a book. I told the librarian the color of the book and even stated the main theorem of chapter two. Since she was paid to be friendly and helpful to the engineers, she did not tell me to bugger off, but I did not like the look she gave me. To avoid a repeat of that experience, maybe you could divulge the title? > Hell, it has four authors! Or a few authors? -- Keith

Nov. 14, 2002

OT: 6 disc changer + tape deck 4 sale

by Karl Hiramoto

Sorry about the spam... I'm trying to get rid of my old car stereo. * Clarion ARX 5470 Tape Deck o 35 Watts * 4 Ch. (140 Watts) o AM/FM Radio o CD Controller o Detachable Face o CD Changer Controller o RCA Outputs * Clarion 6 Disc CD Changer RDC634 o Model RDC634 o 6 Disc CD Magazine (CAA-355) o Very good Skip protection o 8 X Times oversampling o Digital Filter o Dual 1 Bit DAC http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1871972065&rd… -- ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø Karl Hiramoto <karl(a)hiramoto.org> Work: 978-425-2090 ext 25 Cell: 508-517-4819 Personal web page: http://karl.hiramoto.org/ Freedom: http://www.technojihad.com/ Zoop Productions: http://www.zoop.org/ KTEQ Rapid City: http://www.kteq.org/ AOL IM ID = KarlH420 Yahoo_IM = karl_hiramoto ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø Just because everything is different doesn't mean anything has changed. -- Irene Peter

Nov. 13, 2002

Thanks

by Pierce Barnard

Hi , I just wanted to thank all those who assisted me in getting Samba up and running. Thanks again.

Nov. 12, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Christopher B Stank

Doh, I guess computer viruses can make your own brain do funny things! I just remembered the default config for 44bsd partition type is READ-ONLY! Thusly the following command is illegal: mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 While, the following works just fine: mount -t ufs -o ro,ufstype=44bsd /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 Thanks for the help Peter!!! /Chris -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Christopher Bruce Stank cstank(a)nortelnetworks.com CES - Sys Test Engineering (978) 288-6185 Nortel Networks (508) 769-9664 (cel) 600 Technology Park (978) 445-5328 (pgr) M/S E65/60/301 (978) 288-4004 (fax) Billerica, MA 01821 248-6185 (esn) On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Christopher B Stank wrote: stanky>I have tried both with and without the ufstype=44bsd, and both stanky>results in the sam wrong fs type. stanky> stanky>"[root@localhost ufs]# mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 stanky>mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1, stanky> or too many mounted file systems" stanky> stanky>The file super.c does exist, too! stanky> stanky>/Chris stanky> stanky>

Nov. 11, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Christopher B Stank

I have tried both with and without the ufstype=44bsd, and both results in the sam wrong fs type. "[root@localhost ufs]# mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1, or too many mounted file systems" The file super.c does exist, too! /Chris -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Christopher Bruce Stank cstank(a)nortelnetworks.com CES - Sys Test Engineering (978) 288-6185 Nortel Networks (508) 769-9664 (cel) 600 Technology Park (978) 445-5328 (pgr) M/S E65/60/301 (978) 288-4004 (fax) Billerica, MA 01821 248-6185 (esn) On 11 Nov 2002, Peter Gutowski wrote: peter>sorry for the confusion. Here's the corrected snippet: peter> peter>I think you really need to type in 'ufstype=44bsd' and not just '44bsd' peter> peter>so your mount command probably should be: peter> peter>mount -t ufs -o ufstype=bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 peter> peter>( in your linux src directory, see fs/ufs/super.c ) peter> peter>HTH. -pg peter> peter> peter> peter>_______________________________________________ peter>Wlug mailing list peter>Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org peter>http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug peter>

Nov. 11, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Peter Gutowski

sorry for the confusion. Here's the corrected snippet: I think you really need to type in 'ufstype=44bsd' and not just '44bsd' so your mount command probably should be: mount -t ufs -o ufstype=bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 ( in your linux src directory, see fs/ufs/super.c ) HTH. -pg

Nov. 11, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Peter Gutowski

I think you really need to type in 'ufsoption=44bsd' and not just '44bsd' so your mount command probably should be: mount -t ufs -o ufstype=bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 ( in your linux src directory, see fs/ufs/super.c ) HTH. -pg On Monday, November 11, 2002 1:45 PM, Christopher B Stank <stanky(a)WPI.EDU> wrote: >Opps! > >When I said bsd44, I actually meant 44bsd. > >Mount options for ufs > ufstype=value > > UFS is a file system widely used in different operating >systems. The problems are differences among implementations. Features of >some implementations are undocumented, so its hard to recognize the type >of ufs automatically. That's why the user must specify the type of ufs by >mount option. Possible values are: > > old Old format of ufs, this is the default, read only. > > 44bsd For filesystems created by a BSD-like system >(NetBSD,FreeBSD,OpenBSD). > >etc. > >Sorry for any confusion! I have also tried it without the -o 44bsd and >get the same error. > >/Chris > > -- Peter Gutowski <peter(a)linuxchamps.com> // tel.: (413) 531-0123 "When in company, put not your hands to any part of the body not usually discovered." --George Washington, _Rules for Civility and Decent Behavior_

Nov. 11, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Christopher B Stank

Opps! When I said bsd44, I actually meant 44bsd. Mount options for ufs ufstype=value UFS is a file system widely used in different operating systems. The problems are differences among implementations. Features of some implementations are undocumented, so its hard to recognize the type of ufs automatically. That's why the user must specify the type of ufs by mount option. Possible values are: old Old format of ufs, this is the default, read only. 44bsd For filesystems created by a BSD-like system (NetBSD,FreeBSD,OpenBSD). etc. Sorry for any confusion! I have also tried it without the -o 44bsd and get the same error. /Chris -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Christopher Bruce Stank cstank(a)nortelnetworks.com CES - Sys Test Engineering (978) 288-6185 Nortel Networks (508) 769-9664 (cel) 600 Technology Park (978) 445-5328 (pgr) M/S E65/60/301 (978) 288-4004 (fax) Billerica, MA 01821 248-6185 (esn) On 11 Nov 2002, Peter Gutowski wrote: peter>Sometimes you gotta believe the error message. peter> peter>I've reread the mount man page and I see no reference to bsd44 as being a legal option. Have you tried issuing the command without the '-o bsd44'? peter> peter>On Monday, November 11, 2002 7:19 AM, Christopher B Stank <stanky(a)parrottech.net> wrote: peter>>Greetings All! peter>> peter>>I am having an issue when attempting to mount a bsd44 (a freebsd peter>>partition) under a base install of Redhat 8.0. peter>> peter>>The kernel is 2.4.18-14, and has loaded the ufs f/s module. peter>> peter>>The FAT looks like: peter>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System peter>>/dev/hdc1 * 1 1912 15358108+ a5 FreeBSD peter>>/dev/hdc2 * 1913 8796 55295730 a5 FreeBSD peter>>/dev/hdc3 * 8797 9688 7164990 a5 FreeBSD peter>>/dev/hdc4 * 9689 9731 345397+ a5 FreeBSD peter>> peter>>I have attempted to mount the hdc1 partition as follows: peter>>mount -t ufs -o bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 peter>> peter>>and I get the following error: peter>>"mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1, peter>> or too many mounted file systems" peter>> peter>>Does anyone have any insight as to what I am doing wrong! Any help would peter>>be greatly appreciated, as I need to get the data off these FreeBSD peter>>partitions before I format them as EXT3. peter>> peter>>Thanks in advance! peter>>/Chris peter> peter>>Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org peter>>http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug peter>> peter> peter> peter>

Nov. 11, 2002