- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] Gigabit NICs for Linux

by Richard Klein

sageman(a)WPI.EDU wrote: > All, > > Additionally, I'm looking for a gigabit switch. Only need like 4-8 ports > and would like it, again, to work very easily. Never used a switch, just > hubs and routers. Right now, have a hub hooked into a router. From what I > understand, if I replace the hub with a switch, it should *just work*. > Basically, a switch is like a hub, but with full duplex support and maybe > some fancy QoS features or something, right? As I understand it, switches are much simpler and more basic than routers. If it has QoS, I think it's either a router or a managed switch. My GigE router is a D-Link DGS-105, and it has no administration whatsoever; you just plug your cables into it and go. Wikipedia addresses the difference between switches and routers here, but I don't know if it'll clear things up for you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Router#Function Look for a router that allows "jumbo frames". Ref. wikipedia, again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumbo_frames -- Rich

March 31, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Gigabit NICs for Linux

by Brian J. Conway

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:19:40 -0400 (EDT) sageman(a)WPI.EDU wrote: > All, > > Recently, I've been looking to upgrade my current network setup and make > the push to gigabit. At the moment, I'm looking for any suggestions on > gigabit NICs that folks have got working under the 2.6 kernel, > preferably without too much effort. I'm currently looking at the > Rosewill RC-400, which supposedly uses the r8169 module. Any one happen > to have any luck with that? > > Additionally, I'm looking for a gigabit switch. Only need like 4-8 ports > and would like it, again, to work very easily. Never used a switch, just > hubs and routers. Right now, have a hub hooked into a router. From what > I understand, if I replace the hub with a switch, it should *just work*. > Basically, a switch is like a hub, but with full duplex support and > maybe some fancy QoS features or something, right? > > My plan is to plug the high bandwidth internetwork connections into the > switch which then connects into my router and through to a cable modem. > Basically, fast connection on the network for transferring files, > streaming and such, but, when it comes to the internet, cable modem is > the bottleneck, so who cares if the router supports gigabit, right? Does > this sound reasonable to you network folks out there? > > Thanks for all your help! > > Carlton Stedman I've been using Intel e1000 devices under FreeBSD and Linux (onboard and PCI NICs), they are well-supported and pretty good/low-CPU use cards. For some reason I've been using D-Link switches over the years, not sure why, I wouldn't recommend any of their other hardware, but their 100 Mbps and Gigabit switches have always worked great. My recent purchases for home were: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106123 (e1000 $32 retail, more coming in stock soon, I assume) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833127082 ($40 after rebate) I've also been using the onboard Broadcom BGE cards at work, those have worked relatively well except in cases of the very latest chips not being supported with a given OS/kernel. I don't think those are offered in card form anyway, though. Brian J. Conway

March 31, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Seeking help with a USB barcode scanner

by Jamie Guinan

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Andy Stewart wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > HI everybody, > > Does anybody in the group have any experience using a USB barcode > scanner with Linux? Its tough to google for "barcode scanner" since > each term brings up its own set of things which aren't what I seek. > > In particular, I have been loaned a USB barcode scanner which is made by > PSC, Inc. with model number QS2500. When I plug it into my laptop, the > USB vendor and device IDs are 04B4:0101. I looked this up on the Linux > USB devices website and it has multiple references (mostly to USB > keyboards). > > I think this device is being handled as a USB HID device, but I'm not > certain. Hi Andy, See if "evdev" is loaded, then try reading the various /dev/input/event* nodes. I have a USB keyboard here. Oh neat, under 2.6.19, they even give you a path that matches the device ids, # od -x /dev/input/by-id/usb-1241_1203-event-kbd (tap tap tap...) 0000000 92a9 460e 0000 0000 36dc 000b 0000 0000 0000020 0001 001c 0000 0000 92a9 460e 0000 0000 0000040 36e0 000b 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ... C code, #include <linux/input.h> int keyboardFd = open(kbdev, O_RDWR); struct input_event ev; int n = read(keyboardFd, &ev, sizeof(ev)); See the fields in ev, you'll get events for press/release, keycode, etc. Have fun! -Jamie > > I'm wondering if Linux has any software that would read the value from a > barcode scanner and do something with it. If I knew which device file > was used, maybe I could "cat <devfile>" and see some output when I > scanned a barcode. > > Note that there are several examples of software for printing barcodes, > but that's not what I need (at least not yet). > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks! > > Andy > > - -- > Andy Stewart, Founder > Worcester Linux Users' Group (http://www.wlug.org) > Chelmsford Linux Meetup Group (http://linux.meetup.com/393) > Amateur Radio: KB1OIQ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGDcRgHl0iXDssISsRAjF2AJ98hr6d4i2EMSQ5AvAWiiyfPLHdWACeLSm+ > uCN6IcuTTYvDZbz44z+t4I4= > =gdbi > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

March 31, 2007

Gigabit NICs for Linux

by sageman＠WPI.EDU

All, Recently, I've been looking to upgrade my current network setup and make the push to gigabit. At the moment, I'm looking for any suggestions on gigabit NICs that folks have got working under the 2.6 kernel, preferably without too much effort. I'm currently looking at the Rosewill RC-400, which supposedly uses the r8169 module. Any one happen to have any luck with that? Additionally, I'm looking for a gigabit switch. Only need like 4-8 ports and would like it, again, to work very easily. Never used a switch, just hubs and routers. Right now, have a hub hooked into a router. From what I understand, if I replace the hub with a switch, it should *just work*. Basically, a switch is like a hub, but with full duplex support and maybe some fancy QoS features or something, right? My plan is to plug the high bandwidth internetwork connections into the switch which then connects into my router and through to a cable modem. Basically, fast connection on the network for transferring files, streaming and such, but, when it comes to the internet, cable modem is the bottleneck, so who cares if the router supports gigabit, right? Does this sound reasonable to you network folks out there? Thanks for all your help! Carlton Stedman

March 31, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Seeking help with a USB barcode scanner

by Mike Leo

we had a demo model, too....it basically just scanned in the data as if you typed it in on the keyboard. ----- Original Message ---- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier(a)gentoo.org> To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Cc: Brian J. Conway <bconway(a)alum.wpi.edu>; andystewart(a)comcast.net Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 10:44:56 PM Subject: Re: [Wlug] Seeking help with a USB barcode scanner On Friday 30 March 2007, Brian J. Conway wrote: > We used similar devices extensively in our wafer fab at my old job (hi > Mike), moo > though not under Linux more than a couple times as my desk. Since > my experience is only partially relevant, I can offer a few words as a > start. The scanners we used had interchangeable cables: When using a PS/2 > wedge (pass-thru) cable, it sat between the keyboard and the computer and > passed data as a standard keyboard, no drivers required and OS-agnostic. > When using a USB cable, it functioned as an HID device, and required only > the standard Windows HID keyboard driver. Scanning would send data as an > HID keyboard input. In both cases, it was transparent to any program we > were using (a simple terminal emulator, in our case), but we did need to > scan a configuration code out of the manual each time we changed cable > types. yeah, the scanners tend to be pretty simplistic ... they usually just send the scanned barcode values straight through ... actually, you'd be surprised how many of these things are runnnig Linux themselves ... some of them you can hijack, but once you get past the novelty of it, the device isnt terribly useful without their application ... -mike _______________________________________________ Wlug mailing list Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

March 31, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Seeking help with a USB barcode scanner

by Mike Frysinger

On Friday 30 March 2007, Brian J. Conway wrote: > We used similar devices extensively in our wafer fab at my old job (hi > Mike), moo > though not under Linux more than a couple times as my desk. Since > my experience is only partially relevant, I can offer a few words as a > start. The scanners we used had interchangeable cables: When using a PS/2 > wedge (pass-thru) cable, it sat between the keyboard and the computer and > passed data as a standard keyboard, no drivers required and OS-agnostic. > When using a USB cable, it functioned as an HID device, and required only > the standard Windows HID keyboard driver. Scanning would send data as an > HID keyboard input. In both cases, it was transparent to any program we > were using (a simple terminal emulator, in our case), but we did need to > scan a configuration code out of the manual each time we changed cable > types. yeah, the scanners tend to be pretty simplistic ... they usually just send the scanned barcode values straight through ... actually, you'd be surprised how many of these things are runnnig Linux themselves ... some of them you can hijack, but once you get past the novelty of it, the device isnt terribly useful without their application ... -mike

March 31, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Seeking help with a USB barcode scanner

by Brian J. Conway

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:16:00 -0400 Andy Stewart <andystewart(a)comcast.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > HI everybody, > > Does anybody in the group have any experience using a USB barcode > scanner with Linux? Its tough to google for "barcode scanner" since > each term brings up its own set of things which aren't what I seek. > > In particular, I have been loaned a USB barcode scanner which is made by > PSC, Inc. with model number QS2500. When I plug it into my laptop, the > USB vendor and device IDs are 04B4:0101. I looked this up on the Linux > USB devices website and it has multiple references (mostly to USB > keyboards). > > I think this device is being handled as a USB HID device, but I'm not > certain. > > I'm wondering if Linux has any software that would read the value from a > barcode scanner and do something with it. If I knew which device file > was used, maybe I could "cat <devfile>" and see some output when I > scanned a barcode. > > Note that there are several examples of software for printing barcodes, > but that's not what I need (at least not yet). > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks! > > Andy We used similar devices extensively in our wafer fab at my old job (hi Mike), though not under Linux more than a couple times as my desk. Since my experience is only partially relevant, I can offer a few words as a start. The scanners we used had interchangeable cables: When using a PS/2 wedge (pass-thru) cable, it sat between the keyboard and the computer and passed data as a standard keyboard, no drivers required and OS-agnostic. When using a USB cable, it functioned as an HID device, and required only the standard Windows HID keyboard driver. Scanning would send data as an HID keyboard input. In both cases, it was transparent to any program we were using (a simple terminal emulator, in our case), but we did need to scan a configuration code out of the manual each time we changed cable types. Brian J. Conway

March 31, 2007

Seeking help with a USB barcode scanner

by Andy Stewart

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HI everybody, Does anybody in the group have any experience using a USB barcode scanner with Linux? Its tough to google for "barcode scanner" since each term brings up its own set of things which aren't what I seek. In particular, I have been loaned a USB barcode scanner which is made by PSC, Inc. with model number QS2500. When I plug it into my laptop, the USB vendor and device IDs are 04B4:0101. I looked this up on the Linux USB devices website and it has multiple references (mostly to USB keyboards). I think this device is being handled as a USB HID device, but I'm not certain. I'm wondering if Linux has any software that would read the value from a barcode scanner and do something with it. If I knew which device file was used, maybe I could "cat <devfile>" and see some output when I scanned a barcode. Note that there are several examples of software for printing barcodes, but that's not what I need (at least not yet). Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! Andy - -- Andy Stewart, Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group (http://www.wlug.org) Chelmsford Linux Meetup Group (http://linux.meetup.com/393) Amateur Radio: KB1OIQ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGDcRgHl0iXDssISsRAjF2AJ98hr6d4i2EMSQ5AvAWiiyfPLHdWACeLSm+ uCN6IcuTTYvDZbz44z+t4I4= =gdbi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

March 31, 2007

Re: [Wlug] DSL testing

by Keith Wright

> From: "Brian J. Conway" <bconway(a)alum.wpi.edu> > > Either way, I imagine a truck roll will still be your > best course of action. > Truck roll? Is that a typo? Is it like a ship biscuit? Or is it like a tractor pull? Or more like rolling your car over? -- Keith

March 30, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Upcoming meeting topic(s)

by Keith Wright

> From: Chuck Anderson <cra(a)WPI.EDU> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:03:39PM -0500, Terry S wrote: > > > > I'm curious to understand, will these be publicly viewable > > pictures, or *only* viewable to those who have your key? > > Generally, you want your public key to be widely distributed. > Keeping the public key secret doesn't improve security. He's not worried about security, he just doesn't want his mother to see those pictures of him mooning the camera. I suppose we can trust the cameraman to use the pictures only as you ask. I was thinking of putting some low-res, but recognizable faces on the WLUG web site, to help us (i.e. me) to remember names. The key signing just made me think of it, but had nothing really to do with the plan. I am not sure why anyone would object to that unless it has something to do with the witness protection program, or running from the law. But I have neither camera nor write access to the web site, so it is not for me to say. -- Keith

March 30, 2007

Re: [Wlug] DSL testing

by Chuck Anderson

On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:57:42AM -0400, Keith Wright wrote: > > You won't be able to see real time Layer 2 stats of > > your circuit, as this information is accessed from > > the DSLAM in the Central Office. > > But I know I have heard some of you talking about > statistics gathering programs for network performance. > Does anyone know of a program that might help to > see how well a DSL line is working, or other > diagnostic tools for this? The only devices that would have access to the statistics he is talking about are your DSL modem and the DSLAM. If your modem doesn't provide the statistics, then there is no way to get them directly unless you had a hardware DSL analyzer to hook up to the line.

March 29, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Upcoming meeting topic(s)

by Chuck Anderson

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:03:39PM -0500, Terry S wrote: > I have a new digital camera I haven't even used yet. I'd be more than > happy to bring my camera. > > I'm curious to understand, will these be publicly viewable pictures, or > *only* viewable to those who have your key? Generally, you want your public key to be widely distributed. Keeping the public key secret doesn't improve security.

March 29, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Upcoming meeting topic(s)

by AlReinhart

You might find the following entertaining if not interesting as some background information for a privacy/identity management meeting. http://www.identity20.com/media/OSCON2005/ Keith Wright wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > >>From: Andy Stewart <andystewart(a)comcast.net> >> >>We appear to have a choice of meeting topics for April: >> >>1) PGP Key signing party > > > In addition to a mere key signing, it would > be nice if someone who knows could talk about > how PGP or GPG works, how to use them and > how they relate to rfc-2440, and whether > they interoperate. > > Also, maybe somebody with a digital camera > could take pictures of WLUG leaders and > followers, and put them on the web site, > together with public key identifiers. > Despite being told several times over the > past few years, I don't remember most > people's names, but I might be able to > if I had a chance to practice at home > with my web browser. > > It is only somewhat useful to have a > record in your keyring that says you were > once convinced that the name goes with the > key, if you have totally forgotten what > person goes with the name. > > -- Keith > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Keith Wright 8822AF38 http://pgp.mit.edu > > iD8DBQFGCdp44xVZAIgirzgRAhCWAJ4+SEw8sYTVefgL/s1gU3CgibrcUwCdFm5y > yRPNmXt27bQgJUC/OD/gpec= > =uN1o > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > -- ---------------------------------- Al Reinhart Phone: (508) 869-6417 DisCom Systems eMail: Reinhart(a)DisCom.com www.DisCom.com

March 29, 2007

Re: [Wlug] DSL testing

by Brian J. Conway

On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:57:42 -0400 (EDT) Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: > But I know I have heard some of you talking about > statistics gathering programs for network performance. > Does anyone know of a program that might help to > see how well a DSL line is working, or other > diagnostic tools for this? It's possible some of that information is available on the internal interface via SNMP, but I haven't frequently seen that on consumer-grade devices. I haven't used DSL in a long while, but I know that that vast majority of cable modems have a status web page on the internal interface at http://192.168.100.1 that gives you upstream and downstream power levels, downstream SNR, frequencies used, and occasionally provisioned rates. (On most well-configured firewalls, that also means remembering to allow 192.168.100.1:80 in on the external interface, heh.) If you hunt around for your DSL modem model in your search engine of choice, there may be something similar. Either way, I imagine a truck roll will still be your best course of action. Brian J. Conway

March 29, 2007

Re: [Wlug] DSL testing

by Karl Hiramoto

Keith Wright wrote: > You won't be able to see real time Layer 2 stats of >> your circuit, as this information is accessed from >> the DSLAM in the Central Office. >> > > But I know I have heard some of you talking about > statistics gathering programs for network performance. > Does anyone know of a program that might help to > see how well a DSL line is working, or other > diagnostic tools for this? > This depends on your DSL modem. Some will display the Signal/Noise ratio on a web page interface, or SNMP port. You may be able to buy a different DSL interface that has these features.

March 29, 2007

Re: [Wlug] DSL testing

by Richard Klein

Keith Wright wrote: > > But I know I have heard some of you talking about > statistics gathering programs for network performance. > Does anyone know of a program that might help to > see how well a DSL line is working, or other > diagnostic tools for this? I don't know the answers, but you might find some useful tools at http://dslreports.com/ . And if you don't get any useful answers here, you might have better luck in their forums. -- Rich

March 29, 2007

DSL testing

by Keith Wright

After several years of near flawless working, I am starting to have trouble with my DSL connection. A few times per year the modem would lock-up. It was rare enough that I did not worry much, I figured it was due to lightening or cosmic rays. In any case, it was rare enough that I could think of no way to debug it, and there seemed to be no real reason to, the power went out more often than the DSL. Lately it has been happening several times a day, I just got done with a burst of about ten consecutive lock-ups. I will be browsing the web, or something and it will just quit working. Ping of the ISP's nearest computer (by IP addr) does not work. I go to the modem, pull out the power plug, wait a few seconds, plug it in, wait for it to boot up, and it works again until the next time. I complained to the ISP (Speakeasy) and the nice guy there said: > I had a look at your circuit and see a sync at 1536 > kbps Downstream / 384 kbps Upstream with decibel > margins of 2.0 dB Downstream / 17.0 dB Upstream. The > downstream decibel margins are very low and as a > result, your line is incrementing heavy errors. I asked if I could see these numbers myself, so that I could try some re-wiring to see if it made the problem better (or worse). He said: > You won't be able to see real time Layer 2 stats of > your circuit, as this information is accessed from > the DSLAM in the Central Office. But I know I have heard some of you talking about statistics gathering programs for network performance. Does anyone know of a program that might help to see how well a DSL line is working, or other diagnostic tools for this? -- Keith

March 29, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Upcoming meeting topic(s)

by Terry S

I have a new digital camera I haven't even used yet. I'd be more than happy to bring my camera. I'm curious to understand, will these be publicly viewable pictures, or *only* viewable to those who have your key? (P.S. I've never made a key before, so this is a good topic for me.) On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:03:05PM -0400, Keith Wright wrote: > > Also, maybe somebody with a digital camera > > could take pictures of WLUG leaders and > > followers, and put them on the web site, > > together with public key identifiers. > > Despite being told several times over the > > past few years, I don't remember most > > people's names, but I might be able to > > if I had a chance to practice at home > > with my web browser. > > > > It is only somewhat useful to have a > > record in your keyring that says you were > > once convinced that the name goes with the > > key, if you have totally forgotten what > > person goes with the name.

March 29, 2007

JOBS - Linux consultants needed

by John Spencer

We have 2 clients in MA that have needs for Linux expertise. Both descriptions are below. Please call or email me if you are qualified or have additional questions. Software Tools Engineer (6+ mths; temp to perm possible) Consultant needed to develop software tools using C++ and Perl scripting to develop and implement flows for verification infrastructure. Skills needed are strong software development skills using C++, Perl, Linux, some Web dev't, and SQL databases(MySQL). Candidate will implement and improve model build, regression and metric measurement tools for unit and full chip level microprocessor verification flows. ************************************************************************ **************** Consultant needed (6+ mths., temp to perm possible) as part of a small team to produce high quality functional specifications, design specifications, product code, unit tests, and build scripts as needed. You must also be able to rapidly and effectively troubleshoot, diagnose, and resolve defects in an existing code base. You must be comfortable selecting and maintaining an appropriate focus in your daily work that will range from broad and abstract system architecture issues to detailed and concrete implementation issues. This is a currently a small team so anyone joining will be involved with a number of things. The main focus will be at the Linux Kernel / Hardware integration layer but you may be involved at multiple levels of the product software and build environment. Responsibilities: - Provide software support and integration for new hardware features as they get added to the platform - Provide Linux support to upgrade Linux distribution as well as associated build environment - Work on low level features such as Software Upgrade - Instrument code and help analyze resource utilization - Maintain code repository - Address operational issues - Work with team on code releases Requirements - BS or MS in Computer Science, or equivalent experience - Either Real-Time OS or DSP experience - Experience in Linux, C, C++, Perl - Innovation and attention to detail - Ability to work independently but to know to get direction when you need it - Ability to work well with others on a small focused team - Excellent written and oral skills - Ability to obtain security clearance Regards, John John Spencer (978) 256-1113 ext 7608 jspencer(a)optimaleng.com OPTIMAL ENGINEERING PARTNERS "Your Optimal partner for full-lifecycle engineering services in embedded and real-time, systems and application development" www.optimalengineering.com <http://www.optimalengineering.com/>

March 28, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Upcoming meeting topic(s)

by Eric Martin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm using Kgpg and I can't see the pic either. Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:32:39AM -0400, Keith Wright wrote: >>> I have a photo on my two current keys if you want to >>> check it out: E580B363 and 45D60F57. :) >> I would love to "check you out", but all I see are >> a couple of eight digit hex numbers. Where's the picture? >> >> ( Stupid questions are an intentional ploy to make somebody >> volunteer to explain it all. ) > > I would volunteer, but I don't live near Worcester anymore. :| > >> PS: OK, OK. I admit it. It's not just a ploy, I really >> am too stupid to find the picture. > > :) > > Generally speaking, it's: > > gpg --edit-key <keyid> > showphoto > > On my Mac, it pops up Preview with the jpg. You could also do: > > gpg --list-key --list-options show-photos <keyid | userid | ...> > > In theory it should work on Linux in X as well, though you may need to set > "--photo-viewer". "man gpg" is helpful, look for "photo". :) > > There may be GUI tools out there to deal with the keys as well. I'm a fan of > the CLI. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGCk0faI8VEtSi4H8RAlFuAKCSwuzHvEx5U8wzapevHz9DtP7I4wCfc0gR f0R4hZUUr3brLoe88XsSRz8= =LBxX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

March 28, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Upcoming meeting topic(s)

by Theo Van Dinter

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:32:39AM -0400, Keith Wright wrote: > > I have a photo on my two current keys if you want to > > check it out: E580B363 and 45D60F57. :) > > I would love to "check you out", but all I see are > a couple of eight digit hex numbers. Where's the picture? > > ( Stupid questions are an intentional ploy to make somebody > volunteer to explain it all. ) I would volunteer, but I don't live near Worcester anymore. :| > PS: OK, OK. I admit it. It's not just a ploy, I really > am too stupid to find the picture. :) Generally speaking, it's: gpg --edit-key <keyid> showphoto On my Mac, it pops up Preview with the jpg. You could also do: gpg --list-key --list-options show-photos <keyid | userid | ...> In theory it should work on Linux in X as well, though you may need to set "--photo-viewer". "man gpg" is helpful, look for "photo". :) There may be GUI tools out there to deal with the keys as well. I'm a fan of the CLI. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "... the menu is written in more elementary Spanish than a Dora the Explorer episode ..." - Karl Chalabala about a lunch menu at work

March 28, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Upcoming meeting topic(s)

by Keith Wright

(Sorry about the stuttering send last time.) > From: Theo Van Dinter <felicity(a)kluge.net> > > FWIW, one can add a JPG photo in with a key, thereby > making this somewhat easier. :) I thought you could, that's what gave me the idea. > gpg --edit-key .... > addphoto That much is in the man pages, but... > I have a photo on my two current keys if you want to > check it out: E580B363 and 45D60F57. :) I would love to "check you out", but all I see are a couple of eight digit hex numbers. Where's the picture? ( Stupid questions are an intentional ploy to make somebody volunteer to explain it all. ) -- Keith PS: OK, OK. I admit it. It's not just a ploy, I really am too stupid to find the picture.

March 28, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Upcoming meeting topic(s)

by Keith Wright

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > From: Andy Stewart <andystewart(a)comcast.net> > > We appear to have a choice of meeting topics for April: > > 1) PGP Key signing party In addition to a mere key signing, it would be nice if someone who knows could talk about how PGP or GPG works, how to use them and how they relate to rfc-2440, and whether they interoperate. Also, maybe somebody with a digital camera could take pictures of WLUG leaders and followers, and put them on the web site, together with public key identifiers. Despite being told several times over the past few years, I don't remember most people's names, but I might be able to if I had a chance to practice at home with my web browser. It is only somewhat useful to have a record in your keyring that says you were once convinced that the name goes with the key, if you have totally forgotten what person goes with the name. -- Keith -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Keith Wright 8822AF38 http://pgp.mit.edu iD8DBQFGCdp44xVZAIgirzgRAhCWAJ4+SEw8sYTVefgL/s1gU3CgibrcUwCdFm5y yRPNmXt27bQgJUC/OD/gpec= =uN1o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

March 28, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Upcoming meeting topic(s)

by Theo Van Dinter

On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:03:05PM -0400, Keith Wright wrote: > Also, maybe somebody with a digital camera > could take pictures of WLUG leaders and > followers, and put them on the web site, > together with public key identifiers. > Despite being told several times over the > past few years, I don't remember most > people's names, but I might be able to > if I had a chance to practice at home > with my web browser. > > It is only somewhat useful to have a > record in your keyring that says you were > once convinced that the name goes with the > key, if you have totally forgotten what > person goes with the name. FWIW, one can add a JPG photo in with a key, thereby making this somewhat easier. :) gpg --edit-key .... addphoto I have a photo on my two current keys if you want to check it out: E580B363 and 45D60F57. :) -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "Finding things in my notes is like archaeology: you never know what will turn up and you have to dust everything off." - Peter Sagerson

March 28, 2007

Re: [Wlug] Hello from new member. April topics?

by Terry S

Thanks Christian and Eric, That's something I will take a look at sooner or later. If it's in "/etc/make.conf", that info would be applied in a recompile, correct? > > This is in fact specified in /etc/make.conf. > > The configuration line is SYNC="<SERVER>" > > - Christian Roy Eric Stein wrote: > > That is probably specified in /etc/make.conf. > > > > Eric > > > > Terry S wrote: >> >> Well, it was a while ago... >> >> >> >> ...in a nutshell, I was rebuilding base system and the portage tree a >> >> few months after install, following instructions posted and detailed >> >> reasoning explained by a senior Gentoo developer. >> >> >> >> After a few problems problems, the error that blocked me from fixing >> >> anything else was that the rsync server I chose at install time was no >> >> longer valid, which I verified by looking at the list again. But no >> >> one seemed to know how to change it, and I just couldn't deal with >> >> re-installing the whole thing at that time

March 28, 2007