- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] SCSI and laptop

by dulsi＠identicalsoftware.com

Quoting "Chuck Anderson" <cra(a)WPI.EDU>: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:56:13AM -0400, Alex Camilo wrote: >> Have you consitered a USB to SCSI adapter? I haven't found much in way of information about them. Will they work with a scanner? They seem geared for connecting SCSI drives. As Chuck has mentioned the few I've seen are rather expensive: http://www.usbgear.net/USB_SCSI_adapters.html > It seems that for about the same price as an adapter, you can buy a > whole new USB scanner. Any recommendations for cheap and well supported usb scanner? Dennis Payne dulsi(a)identicalsoftware.com

Aug. 12, 2009

Re: [Wlug] SCSI and laptop

by Chuck Anderson

> On Aug 11, 2009, at 10:10 PM, dulsi(a)identicalsoftware.com wrote: > I bought a new laptop but have an old umax scanner. Previously I used > a PCMCIA SCSI card to hookup that scanner. My new laptop has > expresscard. What is the easiest way to hookup the old scanner? I > tried to used the old laptop the other day until I had time to look > into how to do it with the new laptop and found it no longer boots. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:56:13AM -0400, Alex Camilo wrote: > Have you consitered a USB to SCSI adapter? It seems that for about the same price as an adapter, you can buy a whole new USB scanner.

Aug. 12, 2009

Re: [Wlug] SCSI and laptop

by Alex Camilo

Have you consitered a USB to SCSI adapter? On Aug 11, 2009, at 10:10 PM, dulsi(a)identicalsoftware.com wrote: > I bought a new laptop but have an old umax scanner. Previously I used > a PCMCIA SCSI card to hookup that scanner. My new laptop has > expresscard. What is the easiest way to hookup the old scanner? I > tried to used the old laptop the other day until I had time to look > into how to do it with the new laptop and found it no longer boots. > > Dennis Payne > dulsi(a)identicalsoftware.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

Aug. 12, 2009

SCSI and laptop

by dulsi＠identicalsoftware.com

I bought a new laptop but have an old umax scanner. Previously I used a PCMCIA SCSI card to hookup that scanner. My new laptop has expresscard. What is the easiest way to hookup the old scanner? I tried to used the old laptop the other day until I had time to look into how to do it with the new laptop and found it no longer boots. Dennis Payne dulsi(a)identicalsoftware.com

Aug. 12, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by David Glaser

Hi Folks, As the orginal poster, I thank all of you for the responses. -David Richard Klein wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:18 PM, John Stoffel<john(a)stoffel.org> wrote: > >> Also, for a home system, I think it makes alot of sense to build a >> nice home server, which sits in a corner and serves files, does >> backups, hosts a development web server, etc. Then having a desktop >> which you can play with, muck around with and rebuild at will, all >> without losing your files or home directory stuff is nice. >> > > That's a great idea! Somehow, though, whenever I build something like > that, to just leave alone to do one job, I end up mucking around with > it, too. I can't leave well enough alone! > >

Aug. 11, 2009

Fwd: [nomoto] OLPC job openings

by Richard Klein

Just thought I'd pass this on: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- if any of you know of strong linux kernel/driver folks, or strong release or test folks, OLPC is looking... http://laptop.org/en/utility/people/opportunities.shtml -- Rich Sent from Marlborough, MA, United States

Aug. 11, 2009

Re: [Wlug] Python – who's curious or learning it, or codes it daily, or teaching it, or ...

by Theo Van Dinter

fwiw, I have a background in C and Perl, and had to learn Python for work. Read the ORA Learning Python book, which was ok, I spent time trying to relate Python to Perl (dict == hash, list == array, tuple == read-only list, etc,) and eventually just started hacking on things and have been relatively successful (or at least, I can write stuff that does what I want. ;)) I'm using Python 2.4, so I'm constantly at http://www.python.org/doc/2.4.4/lib/lib.html looking up things, which is very helpful. The basic syntax and starting to do things is pretty easy, the harder part is getting a grasp on the whole "everything's an object" and using that when writing your own code is harder. I tend to not like object orientation (various reasons), but you have to get at least somewhat into it w/ Python because you have no choice. On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Brian McLinden<brian.mclinden(a)gmail.com> wrote: > A thread for sharing by those with interest in or curiosity about Python. > > For newbies like me, hackers tout the just out major revision of Allen > Downey's classic “How to think like a computer scientist: Learning > with Python.” It's been retitled - “PYTHON FOR SOFTWARE DESIGN: How > to Think Like a Computer Scientist.” > > Buy at Amazon or read free - http://www.greenteapress.com/thinkpython/ > > Favorable review - > http://www.amazon.com/Python-Software-Design-Computer-Scientist/product-rev…

Aug. 10, 2009

Python – who's curious or learning it, or codes it daily, or teaching it, or ...

by Brian McLinden

A thread for sharing by those with interest in or curiosity about Python. For newbies like me, hackers tout the just out major revision of Allen Downey's classic “How to think like a computer scientist: Learning with Python.” It's been retitled - “PYTHON FOR SOFTWARE DESIGN: How to Think Like a Computer Scientist.” Buy at Amazon or read free - http://www.greenteapress.com/thinkpython/ Favorable review - http://www.amazon.com/Python-Software-Design-Computer-Scientist/product-rev… Brian Worcester

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by Richard Klein

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:18 PM, John Stoffel<john(a)stoffel.org> wrote: > > Also, for a home system, I think it makes alot of sense to build a > nice home server, which sits in a corner and serves files, does > backups, hosts a development web server, etc. Then having a desktop > which you can play with, muck around with and rebuild at will, all > without losing your files or home directory stuff is nice. That's a great idea! Somehow, though, whenever I build something like that, to just leave alone to do one job, I end up mucking around with it, too. I can't leave well enough alone! -- Rich Sent from Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by John Stoffel

>>>>> "Gary" == Gary Hanley <gary(a)hanley.net> writes: Gary> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Franklin Moody wrote: >> (Though again, the performance of the onboard components, even though somewhat dated, is usually pretty decent for regular home >> use.) Gary> Very true. When I build a PC for a friend or family member I usually Gary> go integrated as they only want the PC for Internet stuff. Hear hear! Alot of the newer boards with integrated everything really are quite nice. And power efficient and cool. Key things to think about. If it wasn't for wanting room for disks, a Shuttle style box would be a nice idea, and I keep thinking it might make my desktop... Gary> For me I buy discrete devices. And the funny thing is that these Gary> days it's hard to find a motherboard without integrated video, Gary> sound, NIC, etc. So what OS are you running, and what applications are you running with uses all this GPU power? Now I admit my last system, a Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe has a discrete GPU, but I got a Radeon X1250 (in Feb 2008) because it was just one slot and a passive cooler. It's a big performance jump over my old Matrox G450 AGP card for sure! Anyway, I've found that the onboard sound/network to be just fine, dual Gigabit works nicely, and overpowers anything else on the network at this time. Now, back to the core initial question, which was about the vast variety of of components out there to choose from. It's really terribly confusing, and for only a 5-15% difference in performance, you can spend a ton of money. I personally like Newegg.com for ease of comparing systems. I also like the arstechnica.com system guides. They do quite a decent job, esp on the low end. Their god box is silly. They really need to be thinking of a god desktop, and a good server box instead. Also, for a home system, I think it makes alot of sense to build a nice home server, which sits in a corner and serves files, does backups, hosts a development web server, etc. Then having a desktop which you can play with, muck around with and rebuild at will, all without losing your files or home directory stuff is nice. John

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by John Stoffel

Franklin> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:39:37AM -0400, Clint Moyer wrote: >> To the point, the original request was: >> >> "I want to build a compute/file server. I do a lot of heavy duty software development using the Eclipse IDE and the Java and C++ Development tools. Also, I need to store a lot of data - mostly images." >> >> Not especially high-end requirements, beyond perhaps CPU and memory. Franklin> I responded mostly because of the recent talk about Franklin> being bewildered by the wide variety of hardware selections Franklin> and conversations like this help set/spread rules of thumb. Franklin> While the OP probably won't *need* a very high performance Franklin> anything (Eclipse is a big boy but it doesn't require top of Franklin> the line), the place to find it is in discrete components. Franklin> Which is why I ended with "Start with onboard components if Franklin> it doesn't cost you of your requirements (and doesn't cost Franklin> too much) and plan on using discrete components to get Franklin> higher performance at the start and as your later upgrade Franklin> path." I'll agree 100% here with Frank, start with onboard and then goto discrete if you need more performance. One thing to think about though is motherboard which put most of the PCIe lanes into one or possibly two slots, because they're targetting graphics (read games). For a more server oriented board, you'd like to have more slots with more lanes, but since various chipsets are limited to how many lanes they can support, it might make sense to have something like 4 1x slots, 2 4x slots 1 8x slot plus some PCI legacy slots. Of course you'll never find this type of board outside a server only type board, which typically costs lots of bucks. And of course you'll not fit into standard cases either. Franklin> (Oh, and, if you've got the money to spare, those new fancy Franklin> vidcards can do more than just video... VDPAU, OpenCL, and Franklin> so on seem like very cool things to check out to me!) It does look interesting, but I'm also concerned about power/noise issues for a home system. I'd like to get things quieter and use less energy if I can.

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by Franklin Moody

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:39:37AM -0400, Clint Moyer wrote: > To the point, the original request was: > > "I want to build a compute/file server. I do a lot of heavy duty software development using the Eclipse IDE and the Java and C++ Development tools. Also, I need to store a lot of data - mostly images." > > Not especially high-end requirements, beyond perhaps CPU and memory. I responded mostly because of the recent talk about being bewildered by the wide variety of hardware selections and conversations like this help set/spread rules of thumb. While the OP probably won't *need* a very high performance anything (Eclipse is a big boy but it doesn't require top of the line), the place to find it is in discrete components. Which is why I ended with "Start with onboard components if it doesn't cost you of your requirements (and doesn't cost too much) and plan on using discrete components to get higher performance at the start and as your later upgrade path." Frank (Oh, and, if you've got the money to spare, those new fancy vidcards can do more than just video... VDPAU, OpenCL, and so on seem like very cool things to check out to me!)

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by Gary Hanley

On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Franklin Moody wrote: > (Though again, the performance of the onboard components, even though somewhat dated, is usually pretty decent for regular home > use.) Very true. When I build a PC for a friend or family member I usually go integrated as they only want the PC for Internet stuff. For me I buy discrete devices. And the funny thing is that these days it's hard to find a motherboard without integrated video, sound, NIC, etc. -- Gary

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by Clint Moyer

To the point, the original request was: "I want to build a compute/file server. I do a lot of heavy duty software development using the Eclipse IDE and the Java and C++ Development tools. Also, I need to store a lot of data - mostly images." Not especially high-end requirements, beyond perhaps CPU and memory. ---- Franklin Moody <fmoody(a)moodman.org> wrote: ============= On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:08:41AM -0400, John Stoffel wrote: > >>>>> "Gary" == Gary Hanley <gary(a)hanley.net> writes: > > Gary> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Clint Moyer wrote: > >> I'll add that there are a lot of advantages to building with an > >> integrated motherboard. > > Gary> I agree from a convenience and cost perspective, however if > Gary> optimal performance is a priority you still need to purchase > Gary> discrete components. > > Umm... I disagree with this statement. It's more of a 'it depends' > really. :] I'm not sure that it really is an 'it depends' statement. Can you name a single component where the discrete option isn't the path to the highest performance? Video, drive controllers, NICs... Onboard components are primarily chosen for "value" and it usually shows. (That being said, onboard components are usually good for the average case and, assuming they can actually be fully disabled (not always a given historically), can be a good place to start.) > Gary> No matter how much the technology advances intergrated > Gary> components will alway reduce the overall perform of a system to > Gary> a variable degree. > > Or you could say that "Your system is obsolete the second you build > it, so don't sweat it" and just live with this. True but not quite his point, I think. I think the gist was "onboard components aren't top of the line and maybe significantly behind that line". > I've been looking at a new home server, and I don't *care* about > graphics performance. I want lots of PCI and PCIe slots, lots of SATA > ports, dual Gigabit ethernet and integrated graphics. Probably AMD, > since that will give me plenty of performance. And be quiet too. > Silence is golden you know... :] > > Your metrics for performance are quite different from mine. Sure, a > seperate high performance graphics card would be nice, but I don't > play any computer games all that much, and I could drop one in. > > John If you want high performance SATA, NICs, or pretty much anything else, you'll want a discrete component for that too. (Though again, the performance of the onboard components, even though somewhat dated, is usually pretty decent for regular home use.) So I suppose my take on it would be "Start with onboard components if it doesn't cost you of your requirements (and doesn't cost too much) and plan on using discrete components to get higher performance at the start and as your later upgrade path.". Frank

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by Franklin Moody

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:08:41AM -0400, John Stoffel wrote: > >>>>> "Gary" == Gary Hanley <gary(a)hanley.net> writes: > > Gary> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Clint Moyer wrote: > >> I'll add that there are a lot of advantages to building with an > >> integrated motherboard. > > Gary> I agree from a convenience and cost perspective, however if > Gary> optimal performance is a priority you still need to purchase > Gary> discrete components. > > Umm... I disagree with this statement. It's more of a 'it depends' > really. :] I'm not sure that it really is an 'it depends' statement. Can you name a single component where the discrete option isn't the path to the highest performance? Video, drive controllers, NICs... Onboard components are primarily chosen for "value" and it usually shows. (That being said, onboard components are usually good for the average case and, assuming they can actually be fully disabled (not always a given historically), can be a good place to start.) > Gary> No matter how much the technology advances intergrated > Gary> components will alway reduce the overall perform of a system to > Gary> a variable degree. > > Or you could say that "Your system is obsolete the second you build > it, so don't sweat it" and just live with this. True but not quite his point, I think. I think the gist was "onboard components aren't top of the line and maybe significantly behind that line". > I've been looking at a new home server, and I don't *care* about > graphics performance. I want lots of PCI and PCIe slots, lots of SATA > ports, dual Gigabit ethernet and integrated graphics. Probably AMD, > since that will give me plenty of performance. And be quiet too. > Silence is golden you know... :] > > Your metrics for performance are quite different from mine. Sure, a > seperate high performance graphics card would be nice, but I don't > play any computer games all that much, and I could drop one in. > > John If you want high performance SATA, NICs, or pretty much anything else, you'll want a discrete component for that too. (Though again, the performance of the onboard components, even though somewhat dated, is usually pretty decent for regular home use.) So I suppose my take on it would be "Start with onboard components if it doesn't cost you of your requirements (and doesn't cost too much) and plan on using discrete components to get higher performance at the start and as your later upgrade path.". Frank

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by John Stoffel

>>>>> "Gary" == Gary Hanley <gary(a)hanley.net> writes: Gary> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Clint Moyer wrote: >> I'll add that there are a lot of advantages to building with an >> integrated motherboard. Gary> I agree from a convenience and cost perspective, however if Gary> optimal performance is a priority you still need to purchase Gary> discrete components. Umm... I disagree with this statement. It's more of a 'it depends' really. :] Gary> No matter how much the technology advances intergrated Gary> components will alway reduce the overall perform of a system to Gary> a variable degree. Or you could say that "Your system is obsolete the second you build it, so don't sweat it" and just live with this. I've been looking at a new home server, and I don't *care* about graphics performance. I want lots of PCI and PCIe slots, lots of SATA ports, dual Gigabit ethernet and integrated graphics. Probably AMD, since that will give me plenty of performance. And be quiet too. Silence is golden you know... :] Your metrics for performance are quite different from mine. Sure, a seperate high performance graphics card would be nice, but I don't play any computer games all that much, and I could drop one in. John

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by Gary Hanley

On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Clint Moyer wrote: > I'll add that there are a lot of advantages to building with an > integrated motherboard. I agree from a convenience and cost perspective, however if optimal performance is a priority you still need to purchase discrete components. No matter how much the technology advances intergrated components will alway reduce the overall perform of a system to a variable degree. -- Gary

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by Clint Moyer

I'll add that there are a lot of advantages to building with an integrated motherboard. Asus mobos are especially well designed. In fact, most of their current product line incorporates Splash Top, which is Linux embedded in the BIOS that allows you to boot into a basic OS before hitting the hard drive. If you buy one, you can be sure all the components are Linux compatible. My last three builds have been Asus mATX. Clint ---- E Johnson <iris.gates(a)gmail.com> wrote: ============= I have, built April 2009: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600 Brisbane 2.9GHz Socket AM2 65W Dual-Core Processor - $64.99 ASUS M3A78-CM AM2+/AM2 AMD 780V Micro ATX AMD Motherboard - $74.99 Kingston 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory - $44.99 Cooler Master Elite 335 RC-335-KKN1-GP Black SECC Steel ATX Mid Tower Computer Case - $49.99 Acer X193W+BD Black 19" 5ms Widescreen LCD Monitor Some SATA hard drive... don't know offhand. Some DVD drive, I forget, nothing spectacular. According to ASUS, this motherboard is a "Corporate Stable Model (CSM) for long-term availability." It has DVI and VGA output. Specs & reviews here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131330

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] (no subject)

by Gregory Avedissian

Brian McLinden wrote: > > What do you think about this workaround -- > http://www.inatux.com/order These are FSF/FOSS people. I can't see I would recommend more than their base system. Go with a dual-core cpu and probably 2G memory, since it's so cheap now ($30-40 at newegg), and bigger hard drive (e.g. 250GB for around $50). How much do they want with those upgrades? > > And, for cable broadband and live streaming of audio and video, what > combination or package(s) of HW ad SW should I ask for. Wired case? > Wireless case? If you're talking about wired vs. wireless network, it's a lot easier to go with wired. Any linux distro will get you online with a basic desktop installation. (OK, there are probably exceptions.) You'll also get audio and video players. For audio and video, you might need to install additional codecs, but that's generally pretty easy to do. Why don't you want to install the OS yourself? > 4. What Linux distribution would you pair with Unix? > > And, what will I learn from one that I don't learn from the other? > I'm just going to reiterate what others said. You'll learn a lot from installing the OS yourself. Ubuntu is a good choice if you're new to linux, but anything in the top 5 or 10 in the list at distrowatch.com is probably a good choice. The installation procedure is pretty easy these days (on the major distros). Leave room on your hard drive for additional partitions to try other flavors of linux if you want. That's sometimes a better choice than trying it in a VM, because then you get to see how the OS works with your hardware. That tends to be more of an issue when you're using the latest hardware. Greg

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] (no subject)

by James Gray

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Brian McLinden<brian.mclinden(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > 3. YOUR advice for a would be hacker? > > I wonder how folks in this forum might vary from the following > position. Would you prioritize or sequence things differently? > > “Start out by learning bash, then set up your own Unix environment. > This is a biggie. PC-BSD works fine. Learn to use it for your everyday > tasks, learn how to administrate it and keep it up to date and secure. > Then, when you've done that, start in with Python. Solve the Project > Euler problems in whatever language you're learning. Learn which > languages are better suited for particular problems. Learn about > security in programs, vulnerabilities and how to exploit them. Read > other people's code and post your own. Learn the low-level stuff > later.” A starting hacker probably has some idea of the sort of problem they want to solve. Based on the type of problem you are looking to solve someone could steer you toward a choice of languages that try to solve such problems. There are 'introduction to programming' books for most programming languages and in some cases they might be found on line. If one is learning programming as a hobby then I would say learn about the stuff that interests you and follow your nose. Read from books and on line sources. Learn at least one programming language very well. Above all else spend a lot of time writing code - it is a skill after all. I've been meaning to put together a introduction presentation to the python language, but other priorities have my time right now. :-(

Aug. 10, 2009

Re: [Wlug] (no subject)

by Alexander Haley

> Anyone have reading (book, online) suggestions geared at accessible > intro level? More intermediate level? Brian, I have recently read (most of) 'Code : The Hidden Language of Computer Hardware and Software' by Charles Petzold. He takes the reader from the simple on/off flashlight circuit, through the mechanical relays found in telegraph systems, to fundamental computing devices -- and that is only just where I've read through (chapter 17 of 25) - It is available via the central mass library system - so free! I sincerely hope if you check it out, that you like it. Best wishes, Alexander

Aug. 10, 2009

(no subject)

by Brian McLinden

Hi all, Thanks for your helpful postings. I'm coming back to ask further help in sharpening issues before me.. I see four now: 1. Understanding the machine Wanting a more general perspective that will help me anticipate and navigate OS issues as they arise. Just ordered http://www.amazon.com/Write-Great-Code-Understanding-Machine/dp/1593270038/… Anyone have reading (book, online) suggestions geared at accessible intro level? More intermediate level? 2. Getting a machine Freedom of choice in the component market is overwhelming. A curse, actually. I'd be losing significant time just learning how to spec a system. In the Worcester area, is there anyone I can pay to put together a machine for me with some bit of craftsmanship and reliability? That way I can have substantially more control over machine quality. Do any of you have a favorite components list? I'd be most interested in a machine designed for silence, and I'm quite willing to study up on that issue.. fan noise drives me nuts when I'm coding. What do you think about this workaround -- http://www.inatux.com/order These are FSF/FOSS people. I can't see a need for a super fast system yet, as I can't say yet where my project interests will gravitate. In light of that, since optimality makes no sense, what machine specs do you think would be “good enough”? Desirable packages to install? And, for cable broadband and live streaming of audio and video, what combination or package(s) of HW ad SW should I ask for. Wired case? Wireless case? 3. YOUR advice for a would be hacker? I wonder how folks in this forum might vary from the following position. Would you prioritize or sequence things differently? “Start out by learning bash, then set up your own Unix environment. This is a biggie. PC-BSD works fine. Learn to use it for your everyday tasks, learn how to administrate it and keep it up to date and secure. Then, when you've done that, start in with Python. Solve the Project Euler problems in whatever language you're learning. Learn which languages are better suited for particular problems. Learn about security in programs, vulnerabilities and how to exploit them. Read other people's code and post your own. Learn the low-level stuff later.” 4. What Linux distribution would you pair with Unix? And, what will I learn from one that I don't learn from the other? Thanks, in advance, for thoughts, reactions, give and take! Brian

Aug. 9, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by David Glaser

Thanks for the info. -David E Johnson wrote: > I have, built April 2009: > > AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600 Brisbane 2.9GHz Socket AM2 65W Dual-Core > Processor - $64.99 > ASUS M3A78-CM AM2+/AM2 AMD 780V Micro ATX AMD Motherboard - $74.99 > Kingston 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual > Channel Kit Desktop Memory - $44.99 > Cooler Master Elite 335 RC-335-KKN1-GP Black SECC Steel ATX Mid > Tower Computer Case - $49.99 > Acer X193W+BD Black 19" 5ms Widescreen LCD Monitor > > Some SATA hard drive... don't know offhand. > Some DVD drive, I forget, nothing spectacular. > > According to ASUS, this motherboard is a "Corporate Stable Model (CSM) > for long-term availability." It has DVI and VGA output. Specs & > reviews here: > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131330 > > Running on this PC, Debian Lenny (kernel 2.6.26-2-686 Bigmem). > > I have another PC very similar, same mobo but 2.8 gig AMD processor, > built Dec. 2008. This PC has a nVidia Corporation GeForce 8500 GT vid > card that came out of a homebuilt monster running twin dual Xeons, in > which the mobo fried. This PC runs Ubuntu Hardy (kernel 2.6.24-generic) > > These two PCs run cool with only the stock coolers on the CPU, and the > case fans. Right now it's 65 outside, maybe 70 in here, the > motherboards are both 39C and the processors are 40C (mine, using it > now) and the other one at 42C. > > The onboard audio chips work fine under Ubuntu and under Debian Lenny. > > The vid chip in the one without the separate vid card seems to warm up > if I am doing certain video-intensive operations, although this is > rare. It runs movies like Youtube videos just fine, but certain online > viewers, such as like zoom viewers on websites, seem to heat it up > some. I haven't checked to see if the same type of operations heat up > the vid card in the other PC. > > Ethernet chip also works fine, needed no special tweaking. Nothing > needed additional drivers downloaded. > > Setting up this mobo was a little odd at first. It would not recognize > an older HP flatscreen monitor, but can see the Acer monitors just > fine. I RMA'd one mobo before I figured out the problem was the > monitor, not the vid chip on the mobo. HP techs had no clue why this > monitor was not recognized, and could only suggest downloading a > different driver... not needed with the more recently-purchased Acer > monitor. > > I like these monitors very much. They are 19" -- not too big for the > tabletop setup here, yet have 1680 x 1050 resolution, which is hard to > get in the 19" monitors. The monitors now cost about $99 to $119 > depending on who's selling them. These monitors are also among the few > in this size and price range that come with a DVI cable in the box. > > Greg Avedissian of WLUG built these PCs (among many others he's > built), and he may be able to offer further advice. He does a really > nice job building these things & getting them running. I usually am > running several different apps in different windows, all at the same > time. The speed of the processor is very good, and a dual-core is fine > for me. I can wholeheartedly say that I am very happy with these PCs. > All the components work together very well, and they easily do > everything I need. > > Hope this helps. > Liz J > > > 2009/8/9 David Glaser <dglaser(a)glaserresearch.net > <mailto:dglaser@glaserresearch.net>> > > It has been ten years since I built a system and I figure I should > do it > again to refresh my skills. > > I took a look at motherboards and processor combinations and I was > overwhelmed by the proliferation of choices. > > What I was wondering if I could get the members of the group to share > the basic configuration of systems they have built to give me an > idea of > what I should look at. > > I want to build a compute/file server. I do a lot of heavy duty > software development using the Eclipse IDE and the Java and C++ > Development tools. Also, I need to store a lot of data - mostly > images. > > My house is wired with a 1GB Ethernet so I have good bandwidth to > access > the server. > > Thank you for any help. > > -David > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org <mailto:Wlug@mail.wlug.org> > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Aug. 9, 2009

Re: [Wlug] On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by E Johnson

I have, built April 2009: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600 Brisbane 2.9GHz Socket AM2 65W Dual-Core Processor - $64.99 ASUS M3A78-CM AM2+/AM2 AMD 780V Micro ATX AMD Motherboard - $74.99 Kingston 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory - $44.99 Cooler Master Elite 335 RC-335-KKN1-GP Black SECC Steel ATX Mid Tower Computer Case - $49.99 Acer X193W+BD Black 19" 5ms Widescreen LCD Monitor Some SATA hard drive... don't know offhand. Some DVD drive, I forget, nothing spectacular. According to ASUS, this motherboard is a "Corporate Stable Model (CSM) for long-term availability." It has DVI and VGA output. Specs & reviews here: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131330 Running on this PC, Debian Lenny (kernel 2.6.26-2-686 Bigmem). I have another PC very similar, same mobo but 2.8 gig AMD processor, built Dec. 2008. This PC has a nVidia Corporation GeForce 8500 GT vid card that came out of a homebuilt monster running twin dual Xeons, in which the mobo fried. This PC runs Ubuntu Hardy (kernel 2.6.24-generic) These two PCs run cool with only the stock coolers on the CPU, and the case fans. Right now it's 65 outside, maybe 70 in here, the motherboards are both 39C and the processors are 40C (mine, using it now) and the other one at 42C. The onboard audio chips work fine under Ubuntu and under Debian Lenny. The vid chip in the one without the separate vid card seems to warm up if I am doing certain video-intensive operations, although this is rare. It runs movies like Youtube videos just fine, but certain online viewers, such as like zoom viewers on websites, seem to heat it up some. I haven't checked to see if the same type of operations heat up the vid card in the other PC. Ethernet chip also works fine, needed no special tweaking. Nothing needed additional drivers downloaded. Setting up this mobo was a little odd at first. It would not recognize an older HP flatscreen monitor, but can see the Acer monitors just fine. I RMA'd one mobo before I figured out the problem was the monitor, not the vid chip on the mobo. HP techs had no clue why this monitor was not recognized, and could only suggest downloading a different driver... not needed with the more recently-purchased Acer monitor. I like these monitors very much. They are 19" -- not too big for the tabletop setup here, yet have 1680 x 1050 resolution, which is hard to get in the 19" monitors. The monitors now cost about $99 to $119 depending on who's selling them. These monitors are also among the few in this size and price range that come with a DVI cable in the box. Greg Avedissian of WLUG built these PCs (among many others he's built), and he may be able to offer further advice. He does a really nice job building these things & getting them running. I usually am running several different apps in different windows, all at the same time. The speed of the processor is very good, and a dual-core is fine for me. I can wholeheartedly say that I am very happy with these PCs. All the components work together very well, and they easily do everything I need. Hope this helps. Liz J 2009/8/9 David Glaser <dglaser(a)glaserresearch.net> > It has been ten years since I built a system and I figure I should do it > again to refresh my skills. > > I took a look at motherboards and processor combinations and I was > overwhelmed by the proliferation of choices. > > What I was wondering if I could get the members of the group to share > the basic configuration of systems they have built to give me an idea of > what I should look at. > > I want to build a compute/file server. I do a lot of heavy duty > software development using the Eclipse IDE and the Java and C++ > Development tools. Also, I need to store a lot of data - mostly images. > > My house is wired with a 1GB Ethernet so I have good bandwidth to access > the server. > > Thank you for any help. > > -David > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Aug. 9, 2009

On the subject of building systems - Re: PC-BSD, FreeBSD, and iXsystems - anyone know about them?

by David Glaser

It has been ten years since I built a system and I figure I should do it again to refresh my skills. I took a look at motherboards and processor combinations and I was overwhelmed by the proliferation of choices. What I was wondering if I could get the members of the group to share the basic configuration of systems they have built to give me an idea of what I should look at. I want to build a compute/file server. I do a lot of heavy duty software development using the Eclipse IDE and the Java and C++ Development tools. Also, I need to store a lot of data - mostly images. My house is wired with a 1GB Ethernet so I have good bandwidth to access the server. Thank you for any help. -David

Aug. 9, 2009