- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Thanks

by Pierce Barnard

Hi , I just wanted to thank all those who assisted me in getting Samba up and running. Thanks again.

Nov. 12, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Christopher B Stank

Doh, I guess computer viruses can make your own brain do funny things! I just remembered the default config for 44bsd partition type is READ-ONLY! Thusly the following command is illegal: mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 While, the following works just fine: mount -t ufs -o ro,ufstype=44bsd /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 Thanks for the help Peter!!! /Chris -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Christopher Bruce Stank cstank(a)nortelnetworks.com CES - Sys Test Engineering (978) 288-6185 Nortel Networks (508) 769-9664 (cel) 600 Technology Park (978) 445-5328 (pgr) M/S E65/60/301 (978) 288-4004 (fax) Billerica, MA 01821 248-6185 (esn) On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Christopher B Stank wrote: stanky>I have tried both with and without the ufstype=44bsd, and both stanky>results in the sam wrong fs type. stanky> stanky>"[root@localhost ufs]# mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 stanky>mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1, stanky> or too many mounted file systems" stanky> stanky>The file super.c does exist, too! stanky> stanky>/Chris stanky> stanky>

Nov. 11, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Christopher B Stank

I have tried both with and without the ufstype=44bsd, and both results in the sam wrong fs type. "[root@localhost ufs]# mount -t ufs -o ufstype=44bsd /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1, or too many mounted file systems" The file super.c does exist, too! /Chris -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Christopher Bruce Stank cstank(a)nortelnetworks.com CES - Sys Test Engineering (978) 288-6185 Nortel Networks (508) 769-9664 (cel) 600 Technology Park (978) 445-5328 (pgr) M/S E65/60/301 (978) 288-4004 (fax) Billerica, MA 01821 248-6185 (esn) On 11 Nov 2002, Peter Gutowski wrote: peter>sorry for the confusion. Here's the corrected snippet: peter> peter>I think you really need to type in 'ufstype=44bsd' and not just '44bsd' peter> peter>so your mount command probably should be: peter> peter>mount -t ufs -o ufstype=bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 peter> peter>( in your linux src directory, see fs/ufs/super.c ) peter> peter>HTH. -pg peter> peter> peter> peter>_______________________________________________ peter>Wlug mailing list peter>Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org peter>http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug peter>

Nov. 11, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Peter Gutowski

sorry for the confusion. Here's the corrected snippet: I think you really need to type in 'ufstype=44bsd' and not just '44bsd' so your mount command probably should be: mount -t ufs -o ufstype=bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 ( in your linux src directory, see fs/ufs/super.c ) HTH. -pg

Nov. 11, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Peter Gutowski

I think you really need to type in 'ufsoption=44bsd' and not just '44bsd' so your mount command probably should be: mount -t ufs -o ufstype=bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 ( in your linux src directory, see fs/ufs/super.c ) HTH. -pg On Monday, November 11, 2002 1:45 PM, Christopher B Stank <stanky(a)WPI.EDU> wrote: >Opps! > >When I said bsd44, I actually meant 44bsd. > >Mount options for ufs > ufstype=value > > UFS is a file system widely used in different operating >systems. The problems are differences among implementations. Features of >some implementations are undocumented, so its hard to recognize the type >of ufs automatically. That's why the user must specify the type of ufs by >mount option. Possible values are: > > old Old format of ufs, this is the default, read only. > > 44bsd For filesystems created by a BSD-like system >(NetBSD,FreeBSD,OpenBSD). > >etc. > >Sorry for any confusion! I have also tried it without the -o 44bsd and >get the same error. > >/Chris > > -- Peter Gutowski <peter(a)linuxchamps.com> // tel.: (413) 531-0123 "When in company, put not your hands to any part of the body not usually discovered." --George Washington, _Rules for Civility and Decent Behavior_

Nov. 11, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Christopher B Stank

Opps! When I said bsd44, I actually meant 44bsd. Mount options for ufs ufstype=value UFS is a file system widely used in different operating systems. The problems are differences among implementations. Features of some implementations are undocumented, so its hard to recognize the type of ufs automatically. That's why the user must specify the type of ufs by mount option. Possible values are: old Old format of ufs, this is the default, read only. 44bsd For filesystems created by a BSD-like system (NetBSD,FreeBSD,OpenBSD). etc. Sorry for any confusion! I have also tried it without the -o 44bsd and get the same error. /Chris -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Christopher Bruce Stank cstank(a)nortelnetworks.com CES - Sys Test Engineering (978) 288-6185 Nortel Networks (508) 769-9664 (cel) 600 Technology Park (978) 445-5328 (pgr) M/S E65/60/301 (978) 288-4004 (fax) Billerica, MA 01821 248-6185 (esn) On 11 Nov 2002, Peter Gutowski wrote: peter>Sometimes you gotta believe the error message. peter> peter>I've reread the mount man page and I see no reference to bsd44 as being a legal option. Have you tried issuing the command without the '-o bsd44'? peter> peter>On Monday, November 11, 2002 7:19 AM, Christopher B Stank <stanky(a)parrottech.net> wrote: peter>>Greetings All! peter>> peter>>I am having an issue when attempting to mount a bsd44 (a freebsd peter>>partition) under a base install of Redhat 8.0. peter>> peter>>The kernel is 2.4.18-14, and has loaded the ufs f/s module. peter>> peter>>The FAT looks like: peter>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System peter>>/dev/hdc1 * 1 1912 15358108+ a5 FreeBSD peter>>/dev/hdc2 * 1913 8796 55295730 a5 FreeBSD peter>>/dev/hdc3 * 8797 9688 7164990 a5 FreeBSD peter>>/dev/hdc4 * 9689 9731 345397+ a5 FreeBSD peter>> peter>>I have attempted to mount the hdc1 partition as follows: peter>>mount -t ufs -o bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 peter>> peter>>and I get the following error: peter>>"mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1, peter>> or too many mounted file systems" peter>> peter>>Does anyone have any insight as to what I am doing wrong! Any help would peter>>be greatly appreciated, as I need to get the data off these FreeBSD peter>>partitions before I format them as EXT3. peter>> peter>>Thanks in advance! peter>>/Chris peter> peter>>Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org peter>>http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug peter>> peter> peter> peter>

Nov. 11, 2002

Re: [Wlug] mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Peter Gutowski

Sometimes you gotta believe the error message. I've reread the mount man page and I see no reference to bsd44 as being a legal option. Have you tried issuing the command without the '-o bsd44'? On Monday, November 11, 2002 7:19 AM, Christopher B Stank <stanky(a)parrottech.net> wrote: >Greetings All! > >I am having an issue when attempting to mount a bsd44 (a freebsd >partition) under a base install of Redhat 8.0. > >The kernel is 2.4.18-14, and has loaded the ufs f/s module. > >The FAT looks like: > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System >/dev/hdc1 * 1 1912 15358108+ a5 FreeBSD >/dev/hdc2 * 1913 8796 55295730 a5 FreeBSD >/dev/hdc3 * 8797 9688 7164990 a5 FreeBSD >/dev/hdc4 * 9689 9731 345397+ a5 FreeBSD > >I have attempted to mount the hdc1 partition as follows: >mount -t ufs -o bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 > >and I get the following error: >"mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1, > or too many mounted file systems" > >Does anyone have any insight as to what I am doing wrong! Any help would >be greatly appreciated, as I need to get the data off these FreeBSD >partitions before I format them as EXT3. > >Thanks in advance! >/Chris >Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > -- Peter Gutowski <peter(a)linuxchamps.com> // tel.: (413) 531-0123 "When in company, put not your hands to any part of the body not usually discovered." --George Washington, _Rules for Civility and Decent Behavior_

Nov. 11, 2002

mounting bsd44 under RedHat

by Christopher B Stank

Greetings All! I am having an issue when attempting to mount a bsd44 (a freebsd partition) under a base install of Redhat 8.0. The kernel is 2.4.18-14, and has loaded the ufs f/s module. The FAT looks like: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdc1 * 1 1912 15358108+ a5 FreeBSD /dev/hdc2 * 1913 8796 55295730 a5 FreeBSD /dev/hdc3 * 8797 9688 7164990 a5 FreeBSD /dev/hdc4 * 9689 9731 345397+ a5 FreeBSD I have attempted to mount the hdc1 partition as follows: mount -t ufs -o bsd44 /dev/hdc1 /hdc1 and I get the following error: "mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc1, or too many mounted file systems" Does anyone have any insight as to what I am doing wrong! Any help would be greatly appreciated, as I need to get the data off these FreeBSD partitions before I format them as EXT3. Thanks in advance! /Chris -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Christopher Bruce Stank cstank(a)nortelnetworks.com CES - Sys Test Engineering (978) 288-6185 Nortel Networks (508) 769-9664 (cel) 600 Technology Park (978) 445-5328 (pgr) M/S E65/60/301 (978) 288-4004 (fax) Billerica, MA 01821 248-6185 (esn)

Nov. 11, 2002

How to setup Samba

by Pierce Barnard

Hello, I am trying to configure Samba on my Suse Box to share files with my Windows ME box. Is there a webpage or document that I can use to set up Samba?

Nov. 11, 2002

RE: [Wlug] How to setup Samba

by Steve Freitag

http://www.suse.de/us/private/support/howto/samba/ http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba.html

Nov. 11, 2002