- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] REMINDER: Upcoming meeting Wed evening 7PM

by Andy Stewart

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andy Stewart wrote: > > HI Everybody, > > We have a WLUG meeting coming up on Wednesday, April 16th, at 7:00 PM. > Directions to the meeting can be found on the WLUG website. > > There is a remote possibility that I will miss the meeting, which is why > the meeting topic is listed as TBD on the website. If I cannot make it, > I would recommend conducting the meeting as a Birds of a Feather session. HI Everybody, I shall attend the meeting this evening. I'm packing my stuff for my quick demo. See ya there! Andy > > However, if I am able to make it (95% probability), I'll bring my > laptop, battery, DC-DC converter. We can have a discussion about > reducing power consumption in laptops. I can do a quick demo of the > PowerTOP application (see: http://www.lesswatts.org) I don't think > this will take up the entire meeting, but we can use it as a starting > point for further discussions. I also have the CPU frequency control > applications installed to control the clock frequency. > > Naturally, we'll go out for food and refreshments afterwards. > > See ya later! > > Andy > _______________________________________________ Wlug mailing list Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug - -- Andy Stewart, Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group (http://www.wlug.org) Chelmsford Linux Meetup Group (http://linux.meetup.com/393) Amateur Radio: KB1OIQ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIBnTDHl0iXDssISsRAupLAJ9b5A4xLdRoIiMzoLsz9DmZlZirgACeIxpF 0mbjptn55sYQsqqF5OrCjfA= =otpm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

April 16, 2008

REMINDER: Upcoming meeting Wed evening 7PM

by Andy Stewart

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HI Everybody, We have a WLUG meeting coming up on Wednesday, April 16th, at 7:00 PM. Directions to the meeting can be found on the WLUG website. There is a remote possibility that I will miss the meeting, which is why the meeting topic is listed as TBD on the website. If I cannot make it, I would recommend conducting the meeting as a Birds of a Feather session. However, if I am able to make it (95% probability), I'll bring my laptop, battery, DC-DC converter. We can have a discussion about reducing power consumption in laptops. I can do a quick demo of the PowerTOP application (see: http://www.lesswatts.org) I don't think this will take up the entire meeting, but we can use it as a starting point for further discussions. I also have the CPU frequency control applications installed to control the clock frequency. Naturally, we'll go out for food and refreshments afterwards. See ya later! Andy - -- Andy Stewart, Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group (http://www.wlug.org) Chelmsford Linux Meetup Group (http://linux.meetup.com/393) Amateur Radio: KB1OIQ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIA/YFHl0iXDssISsRApQLAKCC/k2490DuXb7/pcw1o8l+AHEHbwCbBFZY bCjExEV9Lx7npyfVJxlk4Cw= =SNod -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

April 14, 2008

Re: [Wlug] SPF

by Richard Klein

> -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Chamberlin > > Except that, as Keith has experienced, and as I have also > experienced, some systems recognize the sending IP address as > coming from a block of known dynamically assigned addresses > and reject the messages/connections even though all the > domain info has been set up correctly. I have used TZO's > services to work around this in the past. Highly recommended. Ah, right. I forgot about that. I haven't run into that problem because I have a static IP address. -- Rich

April 10, 2008

Re: [Wlug] SPF

by Keith Wright

> From: Richard Klein <richspk(a)gmail.com> > > Hmm... Have you ever called Speakeasy and asked them to set up reverse DNS > for you? I seem to recall that's something they have to do on their end. Yes. As I said, that was all done years ago. Though actually I never called them. It was done via email. You might think that answering email would be the basic entry level requirement, the sine qua non/nada/zilch, that any moron would learn to do before becoming an ISP. Sadly, most Idiot Service Providers seem to be totally unable to answer email from customers. They are only interested in phone calls from people who have no email. Speakeasy has someone who knows what is and who answers email at 2am Sunday faster than most of them can get an sales droid to pick up the phone during business hours. Anyway, I run a primary name server while they run a couple of secondaries and reverse DNS. I think I may have an officially "dynamic" IP address, but it was set up before DHCP. Speakeasy gave me an address when I signed up and since then neither of us have had any reason to touch it. -- Keith

April 8, 2008

Re: [Wlug] SPF

by Richard Klein

> -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Wright > > Yes, that's a good idea. That's why I did it about four years ago. > > It works well, maybe sending mail through Speakeasy is not > really necessary, but I seem to remember that I had a problem > with rejected mail when I sent it from my own machine. > > Maybe something else was wrong, but it's not too broken now, > so I don't fix it. > > -- Keith Hmm... Have you ever called Speakeasy and asked them to set up reverse DNS for you? I seem to recall that's something they have to do on their end. > PS: The answer to the original question was that I use > SPF for outgoing mail, but not incoming. It works, > but maybe anything else would work as well. > Maybe something else would work better. > > Outgoing SPF requires setting up a Domain Name Server. > Once that works it's easy. Example zone records were in > the original answer. > > Incoming SPF reqires setting up an SMTP server. > Even after the SMTP server is working, setting up SPF is > fairly complicated. Maybe there is a distribution that does > most of the setup for you. Thanks for the reminder. Unfortunately, I don't have an answer to the original question. -- Rich

April 7, 2008

Re: [Wlug] SPF

by Doug Chamberlin

Chaim The Squirrel Keeper wrote: > The relevance is just that you don't need those extra-cost services to > get a domain name. When you get a domain name, and set up your MX, > reverse DNS, and other records properly, other mail servers recognize > your mail server as being part of a legitimate domain instead of just > an anonymous user of an ISP's IP address pool. Except that, as Keith has experienced, and as I have also experienced, some systems recognize the sending IP address as coming from a block of known dynamically assigned addresses and reject the messages/connections even though all the domain info has been set up correctly. I have used TZO's services to work around this in the past. Highly recommended.

April 6, 2008

Re: [Wlug] SPF

by Keith Wright

> From: "Chaim The Squirrel Keeper" <richspk(a)gmail.com> > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: > > > From: "Chaim The Squirrel Keeper" <richspk(a)gmail.com> > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: > > > > > > mail gets rejected out of hand, just because it > > > comes from a dsl line. > > > > If that's the reason your mail gets rejected, it's pretty cheap to > > get yourself a domain name without hosting or co-lo. > > > > I send mail from a computer in my basement through a DSL > > line. There is no "hosting" or "co-lo" as I understand > > those terms, so I don't see the relevance of your comment. > > The relevance is just that you don't need those extra-cost services to > get a domain name. When you get a domain name, and set up your MX, > reverse DNS, and other records properly, other mail servers recognize > your mail server as being part of a legitimate domain instead of just > an anonymous user of an ISP's IP address pool. Yes, that's a good idea. That's why I did it about four years ago. It works well, maybe sending mail through Speakeasy is not really necessary, but I seem to remember that I had a problem with rejected mail when I sent it from my own machine. Maybe something else was wrong, but it's not too broken now, so I don't fix it. -- Keith PS: The answer to the original question was that I use SPF for outgoing mail, but not incoming. It works, but maybe anything else would work as well. Maybe something else would work better. Outgoing SPF requires setting up a Domain Name Server. Once that works it's easy. Example zone records were in the original answer. Incoming SPF reqires setting up an SMTP server. Even after the SMTP server is working, setting up SPF is fairly complicated. Maybe there is a distribution that does most of the setup for you.

April 6, 2008

Re: [Wlug] SPF

by Chaim The Squirrel Keeper

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: > > From: "Chaim The Squirrel Keeper" <richspk(a)gmail.com> > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: > > > > > mail gets rejected out of hand, just because it > > > comes from a dsl line. > > > > If that's the reason your mail gets rejected, it's pretty cheap to > > get yourself a domain name without hosting or co-lo. > > I send mail from a computer in my basement through a DSL > line. There is no "hosting" or "co-lo" as I understand > those terms, so I don't see the relevance of your comment. The relevance is just that you don't need those extra-cost services to get a domain name. When you get a domain name, and set up your MX, reverse DNS, and other records properly, other mail servers recognize your mail server as being part of a legitimate domain instead of just an anonymous user of an ISP's IP address pool. -- Rich

April 6, 2008

Re: [Wlug] SPF

by Keith Wright

> From: "Chaim The Squirrel Keeper" <richspk(a)gmail.com> > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: > > > mail gets rejected out of hand, just because it > > comes from a dsl line. > > If that's the reason your mail gets rejected, it's pretty cheap to > get yourself a domain name without hosting or co-lo. I send mail from a computer in my basement through a DSL line. There is no "hosting" or "co-lo" as I understand those terms, so I don't see the relevance of your comment. -- Keith

April 6, 2008

Linux System Admin recommendations?

by Andrew Schiller

We are a small local company that is trying to do something different. We have chosen open source technologies in building our ideas. As the company has become more successful we need help supporting them. We are looking for a team of folks who are passionate about technology and know open source to provide thoughtful, reliable system administration services for our Redhat linux os systems. We have made some bad choices in the past, and as a result received service that has hurt us. We don't know where to look for guidance in choosing, and we are hoping the user group can recommend some good folks who will be there when we need them with depth of knowledge and abilities in performing routine maintenance as well as emergency support when we need it. Your recommendations would truly mean a lot to us. Mercader

April 6, 2008