- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Reminder: Next Meeting Tomorrow night, Thursday Dec 11th, 2014 @ 7pm rm. 331

by Tim Keller

Hey Everybody, The next WLUG meeting is tomorrow night in the mid century room (rm 331) at 7pm. The planned speaker is Jon "Maddog" Hall. Afterwards we'll all head out for pizza. Later, Tim. -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

Dec. 10, 2014

Re: [Wlug] Reminder: Meeting ???? mid-century room.

by Richard Klein

Thanks! On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> wrote: > The meeting is Thursday, Dec 11th 2014. There is no meeting tonight... > Sorry for the confusion. > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Richard Klein <rich(a)richardklein.org> > wrote: > >> It's in my calendar for Wednesday, tonight. Is it really Thursday? >> >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This is all on me, I got my dates turned around and sent out the wrong >>> email. Sorry for any confusion that I may have caused. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tim. >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:07 AM, James Gray <jamespgray(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Keith, I had figured you were being sarcastic in your prior e-mail. >>>> I'm not entirely sure you aren't now. I concluded that the meeting was on >>>> Thursday. At one point Tim indicated Wednesday, but corrected himself that >>>> it was Thursday in another email. Chuck also indicated Thursday in the most >>>> recent email, so the question seemed settled to me. >>>> >>>> I find email subject lines to be often misleading just like the titles >>>> of news articles. Subject lines always seem to get out of date as the >>>> conversion evolves. >>>> >>>> thanks! >>>> On Dec 10, 2014 12:07 AM, "Keith Wright" <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> writes: >>>>> >>>>> > Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> writes: >>>>> > >>>>> >> Yup, I screwed up. I reposted a correct reminder. >>>>> > >>>>> > I don't care _who_ screwed up. >>>>> >>>>> But I do care _which_ was screwed up. >>>>> >>>>> I had decided to go on Wednesday, until I re-reviewed >>>>> my email inbox. >>>>> >>>>> There are five messages in there that say "Wednesday" >>>>> in the subject, including this: >>>>> >>>>> > Yup, I totally screwed up... >>>>> > The meeting is on the 10th NOT the 11th!!! >>>>> >>>>> Nevertheless, I now think maybe Thursday is correct, >>>>> because there is one message that says: >>>>> >>>>> > The meeting is Thursday, >>>>> > December 11th @7pm in the usual place. >>>>> >>>>> I was hoping that my previous message would result >>>>> in a definitive answer, but nothing came all day. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe it seems redundant, but make it two out of three >>>>> and tell me again, please. >>>>> >>>>> It would help if the Web page were updated to mention >>>>> Jon Hall, so it doesn't look like dead information >>>>> forgotten since last year. >>>>> >>>>> -- Keith >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wlug mailing list >>>>> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>>>> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wlug mailing list >>>> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>>> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their >>> constituents as "consumers". >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wlug mailing list >>> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wlug mailing list >> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> >> > > > -- > I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their > constituents as "consumers". > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > >

Dec. 10, 2014

Re: [Wlug] Reminder: Meeting ???? mid-century room.

by Tim Keller

The meeting is Thursday, Dec 11th 2014. There is no meeting tonight... Sorry for the confusion. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Richard Klein <rich(a)richardklein.org> wrote: > It's in my calendar for Wednesday, tonight. Is it really Thursday? > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is all on me, I got my dates turned around and sent out the wrong >> email. Sorry for any confusion that I may have caused. >> >> Thanks, >> Tim. >> >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:07 AM, James Gray <jamespgray(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Keith, I had figured you were being sarcastic in your prior e-mail. >>> I'm not entirely sure you aren't now. I concluded that the meeting was on >>> Thursday. At one point Tim indicated Wednesday, but corrected himself that >>> it was Thursday in another email. Chuck also indicated Thursday in the most >>> recent email, so the question seemed settled to me. >>> >>> I find email subject lines to be often misleading just like the titles >>> of news articles. Subject lines always seem to get out of date as the >>> conversion evolves. >>> >>> thanks! >>> On Dec 10, 2014 12:07 AM, "Keith Wright" <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: >>> >>>> Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> writes: >>>> >>>> > Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> writes: >>>> > >>>> >> Yup, I screwed up. I reposted a correct reminder. >>>> > >>>> > I don't care _who_ screwed up. >>>> >>>> But I do care _which_ was screwed up. >>>> >>>> I had decided to go on Wednesday, until I re-reviewed >>>> my email inbox. >>>> >>>> There are five messages in there that say "Wednesday" >>>> in the subject, including this: >>>> >>>> > Yup, I totally screwed up... >>>> > The meeting is on the 10th NOT the 11th!!! >>>> >>>> Nevertheless, I now think maybe Thursday is correct, >>>> because there is one message that says: >>>> >>>> > The meeting is Thursday, >>>> > December 11th @7pm in the usual place. >>>> >>>> I was hoping that my previous message would result >>>> in a definitive answer, but nothing came all day. >>>> >>>> Maybe it seems redundant, but make it two out of three >>>> and tell me again, please. >>>> >>>> It would help if the Web page were updated to mention >>>> Jon Hall, so it doesn't look like dead information >>>> forgotten since last year. >>>> >>>> -- Keith >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wlug mailing list >>>> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>>> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wlug mailing list >>> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their >> constituents as "consumers". >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wlug mailing list >> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

Dec. 10, 2014

Re: [Wlug] Reminder: Meeting ???? mid-century room.

by Richard Klein

It's in my calendar for Wednesday, tonight. Is it really Thursday? On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> wrote: > This is all on me, I got my dates turned around and sent out the wrong > email. Sorry for any confusion that I may have caused. > > Thanks, > Tim. > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:07 AM, James Gray <jamespgray(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Keith, I had figured you were being sarcastic in your prior e-mail. >> I'm not entirely sure you aren't now. I concluded that the meeting was on >> Thursday. At one point Tim indicated Wednesday, but corrected himself that >> it was Thursday in another email. Chuck also indicated Thursday in the most >> recent email, so the question seemed settled to me. >> >> I find email subject lines to be often misleading just like the titles of >> news articles. Subject lines always seem to get out of date as the >> conversion evolves. >> >> thanks! >> On Dec 10, 2014 12:07 AM, "Keith Wright" <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: >> >>> Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> writes: >>> >>> > Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> writes: >>> > >>> >> Yup, I screwed up. I reposted a correct reminder. >>> > >>> > I don't care _who_ screwed up. >>> >>> But I do care _which_ was screwed up. >>> >>> I had decided to go on Wednesday, until I re-reviewed >>> my email inbox. >>> >>> There are five messages in there that say "Wednesday" >>> in the subject, including this: >>> >>> > Yup, I totally screwed up... >>> > The meeting is on the 10th NOT the 11th!!! >>> >>> Nevertheless, I now think maybe Thursday is correct, >>> because there is one message that says: >>> >>> > The meeting is Thursday, >>> > December 11th @7pm in the usual place. >>> >>> I was hoping that my previous message would result >>> in a definitive answer, but nothing came all day. >>> >>> Maybe it seems redundant, but make it two out of three >>> and tell me again, please. >>> >>> It would help if the Web page were updated to mention >>> Jon Hall, so it doesn't look like dead information >>> forgotten since last year. >>> >>> -- Keith >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wlug mailing list >>> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wlug mailing list >> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> >> > > > -- > I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their > constituents as "consumers". > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > >

Dec. 10, 2014

Reminder: Meeting Dec 11 mid-century room.

by Keith Wright

Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> writes: > This is all on me, I got my dates turned around and > sent out the wrong email. Sorry for any confusion > that I may have caused. > > Thanks, > Tim. Not again! You have now apologized four or five times, but just two of those times included the date. Once Wednesday, once Thursday. I was not being sarcastic; I wanted to know the answer. Since you quoted James, who said Thursday, and did not correct that, I'm going with Thursday. If that's wrong, sorry I will miss it. I'm leaving now and won't read email again until late tonight. -- Keith > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:07 AM, James Gray <jamespgray(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Keith, I had figured you were being sarcastic in your prior e-mail. >> I'm not entirely sure you aren't now. I concluded that the meeting was on >> Thursday. At one point Tim indicated Wednesday, but corrected himself that >> it was Thursday in another email. Chuck also indicated Thursday in the most >> recent email, so the question seemed settled to me. >> >> I find email subject lines to be often misleading just like the titles of >> news articles. Subject lines always seem to get out of date as the >> conversion evolves. >> >> thanks! >> On Dec 10, 2014 12:07 AM, "Keith Wright" <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: >> >>> Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> writes: >>> >>> > Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> writes: >>> > >>> >> Yup, I screwed up. I reposted a correct reminder. >>> > >>> > I don't care _who_ screwed up. >>> >>> But I do care _which_ was screwed up. >>> >>> I had decided to go on Wednesday, until I re-reviewed >>> my email inbox. >>> >>> There are five messages in there that say "Wednesday" >>> in the subject, including this: >>> >>> > Yup, I totally screwed up... >>> > The meeting is on the 10th NOT the 11th!!! >>> >>> Nevertheless, I now think maybe Thursday is correct, >>> because there is one message that says: >>> >>> > The meeting is Thursday, >>> > December 11th @7pm in the usual place. >>> >>> I was hoping that my previous message would result >>> in a definitive answer, but nothing came all day. >>> >>> Maybe it seems redundant, but make it two out of three >>> and tell me again, please. >>> >>> It would help if the Web page were updated to mention >>> Jon Hall, so it doesn't look like dead information >>> forgotten since last year. >>> >>> -- Keith >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wlug mailing list >>> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wlug mailing list >> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> >>

Dec. 10, 2014

Re: [Wlug] Reminder: Meeting ???? mid-century room.

by Tim Keller

This is all on me, I got my dates turned around and sent out the wrong email. Sorry for any confusion that I may have caused. Thanks, Tim. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:07 AM, James Gray <jamespgray(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Keith, I had figured you were being sarcastic in your prior e-mail. > I'm not entirely sure you aren't now. I concluded that the meeting was on > Thursday. At one point Tim indicated Wednesday, but corrected himself that > it was Thursday in another email. Chuck also indicated Thursday in the most > recent email, so the question seemed settled to me. > > I find email subject lines to be often misleading just like the titles of > news articles. Subject lines always seem to get out of date as the > conversion evolves. > > thanks! > On Dec 10, 2014 12:07 AM, "Keith Wright" <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: > >> Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> writes: >> >> > Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> writes: >> > >> >> Yup, I screwed up. I reposted a correct reminder. >> > >> > I don't care _who_ screwed up. >> >> But I do care _which_ was screwed up. >> >> I had decided to go on Wednesday, until I re-reviewed >> my email inbox. >> >> There are five messages in there that say "Wednesday" >> in the subject, including this: >> >> > Yup, I totally screwed up... >> > The meeting is on the 10th NOT the 11th!!! >> >> Nevertheless, I now think maybe Thursday is correct, >> because there is one message that says: >> >> > The meeting is Thursday, >> > December 11th @7pm in the usual place. >> >> I was hoping that my previous message would result >> in a definitive answer, but nothing came all day. >> >> Maybe it seems redundant, but make it two out of three >> and tell me again, please. >> >> It would help if the Web page were updated to mention >> Jon Hall, so it doesn't look like dead information >> forgotten since last year. >> >> -- Keith >> _______________________________________________ >> Wlug mailing list >> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

Dec. 10, 2014

Re: [Wlug] Reminder: Meeting ???? mid-century room.

by James Gray

Hi Keith, I had figured you were being sarcastic in your prior e-mail. I'm not entirely sure you aren't now. I concluded that the meeting was on Thursday. At one point Tim indicated Wednesday, but corrected himself that it was Thursday in another email. Chuck also indicated Thursday in the most recent email, so the question seemed settled to me. I find email subject lines to be often misleading just like the titles of news articles. Subject lines always seem to get out of date as the conversion evolves. thanks! On Dec 10, 2014 12:07 AM, "Keith Wright" <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> wrote: > Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> writes: > > > Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > >> Yup, I screwed up. I reposted a correct reminder. > > > > I don't care _who_ screwed up. > > But I do care _which_ was screwed up. > > I had decided to go on Wednesday, until I re-reviewed > my email inbox. > > There are five messages in there that say "Wednesday" > in the subject, including this: > > > Yup, I totally screwed up... > > The meeting is on the 10th NOT the 11th!!! > > Nevertheless, I now think maybe Thursday is correct, > because there is one message that says: > > > The meeting is Thursday, > > December 11th @7pm in the usual place. > > I was hoping that my previous message would result > in a definitive answer, but nothing came all day. > > Maybe it seems redundant, but make it two out of three > and tell me again, please. > > It would help if the Web page were updated to mention > Jon Hall, so it doesn't look like dead information > forgotten since last year. > > -- Keith > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Dec. 10, 2014

Re: [Wlug] Reminder: Meeting ???? mid-century room.

by Keith Wright

Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> writes: > Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> writes: > >> Yup, I screwed up. I reposted a correct reminder. > > I don't care _who_ screwed up. But I do care _which_ was screwed up. I had decided to go on Wednesday, until I re-reviewed my email inbox. There are five messages in there that say "Wednesday" in the subject, including this: > Yup, I totally screwed up... > The meeting is on the 10th NOT the 11th!!! Nevertheless, I now think maybe Thursday is correct, because there is one message that says: > The meeting is Thursday, > December 11th @7pm in the usual place. I was hoping that my previous message would result in a definitive answer, but nothing came all day. Maybe it seems redundant, but make it two out of three and tell me again, please. It would help if the Web page were updated to mention Jon Hall, so it doesn't look like dead information forgotten since last year. -- Keith

Dec. 10, 2014

Re: [Wlug] Reminder: Meeting ???? mid-century room.

by Keith Wright

Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> writes: > Yup, I screwed up. I reposted a correct reminder. I don't care _who_ screwed up. The web site still says "Thu Dec 11 2014", as of time of this msg---2014-12-08(Mon) 18:37:45EST The subject line of the msg to which I reply is [Wlug] Reminder: Meeting Wednesday Dec 10th. Something remains screwed up. What does Mr. Hall think it is? -- Keith

Dec. 8, 2014

Re: [Wlug] Reminder: Meeting Wednesday Dec 10th @7pm (rm 331) mid-century room.

by Tim Keller

Yup, I screwed up. I reposted a correct reminder. Sorry you can't make it Chuck. On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> wrote: > Ummm...check again. > > http://www.wlug.org/ > > Thu Dec 11 2014 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM > > They are all Thursdays for the forseeable future at least. > > Unfortunately, I won't be able to make it this month either way. > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:53:55PM -0500, Tim Keller wrote: > > Yup, I totally screwed up... The meeting is on the 10th NOT the 11th!!! > > Sorry about that! > > > > Thanks, > > Tim. > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Matt Cheung <mgcheung(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I thought I saw earlier that this would be on Thursday the 11th. Just > > > want to make sure I know when it's supposed to be. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/08/2014 04:18 PM, Tim Keller wrote: > > > > > > Hey Everybody, > > > > > > There's a meeting scheduled for Wednesday at 7pm rm 331. Be there or > > > get your geek cards revoked! > > > > > > I know there's inclement weather predicted for Tuesday, so it should > be > > > all clear by Wednesday night. However if things change and it looks > like > > > the roads will be a mess, we'll reassess. > > > > > > Unless the plans change, Jon "maddog" Hall will be giving a talk! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Tim. > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

Dec. 8, 2014