- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Status of the Show?

by Keller, Tim

Due to a midterm, I wasn't able to make it out to Shrewsbury to the tv studio. What came of the meeting out there? Thanks, Tim.

Oct. 28, 2003

Scheduling software

by mlong＠datalong.com

Hi, I am working with a Director of Parks and Recreation Dept here in MA to automate their office. The first piece to be tackled is the scheduling of the town ball fields. Does anyone know of any open source projects that can do this? Thanks, Mike

Oct. 27, 2003

open source and massachusetts

by doug waud

Hi all I was somewhat surprised not to see mention of this article on this list so I thought I'd pass it on. On Monday the T&G had an article "Tech Policy Changes --- Mass going open source". The gist was that Finance secretary, Erik Kriss instructed the state's chief technology officer to adopt a policy of "open standards, open source" for all future spending on information technology. Interesting. It will be interesting to see what comes of this. doug

Oct. 23, 2003

Re: [Wlug] Fw: RE: show

by doug waud

doug waud wrote: > Hi all > I have been lurking and on the horns of a dilema. Snip, snip > Since the "event" is right here is Shrewsbury, I'll probably show up To compound that bad metaphor, a third horn has appeared, I just realizd that today is my birthday and my wife is taking me out to dinner. All those of you who are married will know that horn trumps the other two! So, you'll have to get on without me :-( :-) Sorry, I'll try, probably unsuccessfully, to avoid another such "senior moment" in the future. doug

Oct. 21, 2003

Fw: Fw: RE: show

by Yury I Vashugin

thanks everyone! you're right there! i've scheduled a meeting in the production room with people who are interested in making the show to discuss the details(see below). with everyone's responces so far i don't think it's quite possible to even meet for a production discussion. i've canceled the show time(production meeting) for tomorrow due to the lack of people . however i'll be there anyway......... as far as editing - it should be a 'live' show as previosly mentioned(that's where a good show host will be in need). if anyone wants to spent hours editing footage it would not be me. yury ps al, mattew thank you for your desire to participate in the project. i greatly appreciate your responce. Hi! Since my job is in the TV field, I have been watching this thread. Before you can even look at a studio, there are several things that need to be acomplished. The Producer (someone has to take the reins and make decisions, studio reservations, find crew, etc.) needs to set up some production meetings and decide how the show will be formatted (is it a series of shows, is it a one time show, talking heads show, magazine type, etc.). Then, a script has to be written. What will happen when, what needs to be edited, how long the final production will be, etc. Then a crew has to be chosen: director, camera operators, editors, etc. Then studio time, if needed, could be reserved. If someone has a digital video camera, I believe there is some editing software out there that runs on Linux. Doug, you are right, but your numbers are off a tad; for every second of finished video, approx. 1 minute of post production are required. Pre-production time is even more than that, sometimes. Don't let the numbers scare you...it's still quite do-able, just remember, a good product takes some time and work. Walt On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 20:08, doug waud wrote: I have been lurking and on the horns of a dilema. The above comments got me off the fence. (On re-reading, that is an atrocious mixed metaphor --- natural talent!) :-) Then general idea of proseletizing strikes me as reasonable. However, I think it is a good idea to do as good a job as possible. Although I admit to little direct experience with such exercises, my impression is that they should not be lightly undertaken. In particular, I gather it takes about ten hours preparation for one hour of finished product (and that ratio is probabley optimistic). You have to identify your audience, identify, rank and organize what topics should be covered, decide on how best to utilize the time, write some sort of at least a detailed outline, if not a full script, try dry run(s). etc. So far, all I see is the idea that a group of well-meaning people are supposed to show up and "wing it". Sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The discussion at the end of the last WLUG meeting demonstrated little more that that there were about as many views as to how to proceed as there were people in the discussion. Lots of chiefs, no indians. Now I readily confess that I am very good at spotting the negative side of just about anything. :-) (On a plane ride from Florida to Philadelphia, I once convinved a pharmacological colleague that an idea he was exploring made no sense at all. Years later, when Julie Axelrod got the Nobel prize for that general concept, I had one of those "oh shit" moments. Fortunately for me, the guy from Philadelphia, it turned out, had dropped the issue, but not on the basis of my comments.) The other horn of my dilema, is that I would like to help, but don't want to appear and just be a wet blanket. Since the "event" is right here is Shrewsbury, I'll probably show up (since I can at least function as a "gofer", pull out power cords and the like) but try to maintain a low profile. doug --------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Yury I Vashugin <vashugins(a)juno.com> To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Cc: wlug(a)wlug.org Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:55:39 -0400 Subject: Fw: RE: show hi, everyone. since we talked about producing an educational show about linux and putting it 'in-the-air' at the last wlug meeting and i saw a very enthusiastic response so i've reserved the studio for oct.21(see below). there's a problem with a converter but i'm sure we can find a laptop with a video output. for the show we need two cameramen(anyone can do that; very simple duties and can be learned within 3-5 min), a show host and guests. please, bring any suggestions or/and recommendations. thanks. yury --------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marc Serra <mserra(a)ci.shrewsbury.ma.us> To: 'Yury I Vashugin' <vashugins(a)juno.com> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:42:56 -0400 Subject: RE: show Message-ID: <A7F72312FF5DB348BE2D037A6FE5F1C1407EC2@selpnt2> Yes. Does anybody in the group have access to a scan converter or can you use a computer with a video card output? Since we spoke about it, our last scan converter was put into service to be used on one of our channel's for our bulletin board. For you to use it, we would have to take a channel off the air. I know that a lot of laptops have video out. -----Original Message----- From: Yury I Vashugin [mailto:vashugins@juno.com] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 11:48 AM To: mserra(a)ci.shrewsbury.ma.us Subject: show marc, can i reserve the studio for half-an-hour show on tuesday, october 21 at 6:30 (actually it will not be a show; just a preliminary stuff- what light, what background, what settings we want for 'linux show', to try a scanner converter etc)? yury

Oct. 20, 2003

Re: [Wlug] Fw: RE: show

by Walt Sawyer

Hi! Since my job is in the TV field, I have been watching this thread. Before you can even look at a studio, there are several things that need to be acomplished. The Producer (someone has to take the reins and make decisions, studio reservations, find crew, etc.) needs to set up some production meetings and decide how the show will be formatted (is it a series of shows, is it a one time show, talking heads show, magazine type, etc.). Then, a script has to be written. What will happen when, what needs to be edited, how long the final production will be, etc. Then a crew has to be chosen: director, camera operators, editors, etc. Then studio time, if needed, could be reserved. If someone has a digital video camera, I believe there is some editing software out there that runs on Linux. Doug, you are right, but your numbers are off a tad; for every second of finished video, approx. 1 minute of post production are required. Pre-production time is even more than that, sometimes. Don't let the numbers scare you...it's still quite do-able, just remember, a good product takes some time and work. Walt On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 20:08, doug waud wrote: > Hi all > > Yury I Vashugin wrote: > > > first, we need people to produce the show. it's a commitment of half an > > hour ones? a month.(could be ones in two months) is there anyone who > > would like to join the venture? > > I have been lurking and on the horns of a dilema. The above comments got > me off the fence. (On re-reading, that is an atrocious mixed metaphor > --- natural talent!) :-) > > Then general idea of proseletizing strikes me as reasonable. However, I > think it is a good idea to do as good a job as possible. Although I > admit to little direct experience with such exercises, my impression is > that they should not be lightly undertaken. In particular, I gather it > takes about ten hours preparation for one hour of finished product (and > that ratio is probabley optimistic). You have to identify your audience, > identify, rank and organize what topics should be covered, decide on how > best to utilize the time, write some sort of at least a detailed > outline, if not a full script, try dry run(s). etc. > > So far, all I see is the idea that a group of well-meaning people are > supposed to show up and "wing it". Sounds like a disaster waiting to > happen. The discussion at the end of the last WLUG meeting demonstrated > little more that that there were about as many views as to how to > proceed as there were people in the discussion. Lots of chiefs, no indians. > > Now I readily confess that I am very good at spotting the negative side > of just about anything. :-) (On a plane ride from Florida to > Philadelphia, I once convinved a pharmacological colleague that an idea > he was exploring made no sense at all. Years later, when Julie Axelrod > got the Nobel prize for that general concept, I had one of those "oh > shit" moments. Fortunately for me, the guy from Philadelphia, it turned > out, had dropped the issue, but not on the basis of my comments.) > > The other horn of my dilema, is that I would like to help, but don't > want to appear and just be a wet blanket. > > Since the "event" is right here is Shrewsbury, I'll probably show up > (since I can at least function as a "gofer", pull out power cords and > the like) but try to maintain a low profile. > > doug > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > >

Oct. 20, 2003

Re: [Wlug] Fw: RE: show

by doug waud

Hi all Yury I Vashugin wrote: > first, we need people to produce the show. it's a commitment of half an > hour ones? a month.(could be ones in two months) is there anyone who > would like to join the venture? I have been lurking and on the horns of a dilema. The above comments got me off the fence. (On re-reading, that is an atrocious mixed metaphor --- natural talent!) :-) Then general idea of proseletizing strikes me as reasonable. However, I think it is a good idea to do as good a job as possible. Although I admit to little direct experience with such exercises, my impression is that they should not be lightly undertaken. In particular, I gather it takes about ten hours preparation for one hour of finished product (and that ratio is probabley optimistic). You have to identify your audience, identify, rank and organize what topics should be covered, decide on how best to utilize the time, write some sort of at least a detailed outline, if not a full script, try dry run(s). etc. So far, all I see is the idea that a group of well-meaning people are supposed to show up and "wing it". Sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The discussion at the end of the last WLUG meeting demonstrated little more that that there were about as many views as to how to proceed as there were people in the discussion. Lots of chiefs, no indians. Now I readily confess that I am very good at spotting the negative side of just about anything. :-) (On a plane ride from Florida to Philadelphia, I once convinved a pharmacological colleague that an idea he was exploring made no sense at all. Years later, when Julie Axelrod got the Nobel prize for that general concept, I had one of those "oh shit" moments. Fortunately for me, the guy from Philadelphia, it turned out, had dropped the issue, but not on the basis of my comments.) The other horn of my dilema, is that I would like to help, but don't want to appear and just be a wet blanket. Since the "event" is right here is Shrewsbury, I'll probably show up (since I can at least function as a "gofer", pull out power cords and the like) but try to maintain a low profile. doug

Oct. 19, 2003

Re: [Wlug] Fw: RE: show

by Yury I Vashugin

matthew, if we're doing it i'll give you a ride..... yury On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:05:43 -0400 Matthew Kwiatkowski <mskwik(a)WPI.EDU> writes: > I think this sounds like it's turning into an interesting idea. I > would > be willing to help out as a cameraman or something behind the > scenes, > and I do have a laptop with video out, but I would need a ride from > campus to the studio. I will also be home on break the week of the > 21st, so I can't make that night. > > -Matthew Kwiatkowski > > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 13:39, Yury I Vashugin wrote: > > tim, > > it seems like we don't have enough people to run the show. maybe > > different date and time would be more appropriate for > people(depending, > > of course, on the studio availability)... > > first, we need people to produce the show. it's a commitment of > half an > > hour ones? a month.(could be ones in two months) is there anyone > who > > would like to join the venture? > > second, we need a qualified show host who will lead the show and > > interview guests. i'm a new to linux and i would not dare to > discuss it > > with my expertize. > > third, there is little problem with scan converter which can be > replaced > > by a notebook with a video output. > > a tape of the show will be available immediately after the show > and can > > be broadcast on any channel(depending on the amount of money, > sponsorship > > etc; public access channels are free). also it's a good learning > tool > > which can be multiplied and offered to the public. i still > remember a > > hot discussion on wlug about introducing linux in public schools. > i was > > astonished to see how college students buy c compilers for windows > to do > > their homework for unix/c class. isn't it something? > > they know about linux but, o boy, they're scared of it!!!(wow, > wow- i'm > > not talking about wpi students) > > good point was brought by goug. we need to know what audience we > are > > going to target and where. if we start the show with linux > introduction > > and discuss the difference between linux and commonly used > operating > > systems, to get people intrigued, and continuously refer people to > 'that > > show' then they'll know the connection, how to obtain previous > > educational tapes etc. > > yury > > ps keep forgeting to indicate the studio location- shewsbury > media > > connection, parker rd. > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:40:51 -0400 Andy Stewart > <andystewart(a)comcast.net> > > writes: > > > On Tuesday 14 October 2003 12:55 pm, Yury I Vashugin wrote: > > > > hi, everyone. > > > > since we talked about producing an educational show about > linux > > > and > > > > putting it 'in-the-air' at the last wlug meeting and i saw a > very > > > > enthusiastic response so i've reserved the studio for > oct.21(see > > > below). > > > > there's a problem with a converter but i'm sure we can find a > > > > laptop with > > > > a video output. > > > > > > HI everybody, > > > > > > I'm still quite enthusiastic about this opportunity, but > > > unfortunately I > > > cannot make it on October 21st (Tuesday is generally a bad night > for > > > me). I > > > will be looking forward to reading the e-mails from people who > do > > > make it on > > > that date. > > > > > > Please keep us posted! > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > -- > > > Andy Stewart, Founder > > > Worcester Linux Users' Group > > > Worcester, MA USA > > > http://www.wlug.org > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wlug mailing list > > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > > The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! > > Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! > > Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wlug mailing list > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

Oct. 17, 2003

RE: [Wlug] domain settings on dsl with dynamic IP and NAT (and postfix issue)

by Jim & Toni

Again, more investigation and I found the problem. Need to set the root: alias to a non-root user in the aliases file. Postfix won't deliver mail to the root account. Also, I set the domain info to bellatlantic.net. Seems to do the right things so far. ( I figure if I post what I've found, it may help someone else, right?) Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: wlug-admin(a)mail.wlug.org [mailto:wlug-admin@mail.wlug.org] On Behalf Of Jim & Toni Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 7:46 AM To: wlug(a)wlug.org Subject: [Wlug] domain settings on dsl with dynamic IP and NAT (and postfix issue) One thing I've never been sure of is what to set the domain to on my Linux box. I'm on verizon dsl with a dynamic IP and PPPOE. I just got a dyndns.org domain with a different hostname than what I have for the machine. I set up the machine to run spamassassin (and to experiment). Machine name = grizzy Dyndns.org address = dibb.homelinux.net Email = jntdibb(a)bellatlantic.net What should I be using for the domain name? Specifically I'm having trouble with some part of postfix or spamc/d. I believe an hourly cron job is trying to send mail to 'root' which causes the following in maillog. I can send my postfix/main.cf file if anyone is interested. Oct 14 13:01:01 grizzy spamd[1921]: connection from grizzy [127.0.0.1] at port 3 3171 Oct 14 13:01:01 grizzy spamd[4504]: info: setuid to postfix succeeded Oct 14 13:01:02 grizzy spamd[4504]: Creating default_prefs [/var/spool/postfix/. spamassassin/user_prefs] Oct 14 13:01:01 grizzy postfix/local[4499]: 49D3FD0B45: to=<postfix(a)localhost.lo calhost>, relay=local, delay=1, status=bounced (can't create user output file. C ommand output: procmail: Couldn't create "/var/spool/mail/postfix" procmail: Loc k failure on "spamassassin.lock" procmail: Program failure (74) of "/usr/bin/spa mc" procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded ) Oct 14 13:01:01 grizzy postfix/cleanup[4497]: C4A35D0B43: message-id=<2003101417 0101.C4A35D0B43(a)grizzy.bellatlantic.net> Oct 14 13:01:01 grizzy postfix/nqmgr[1920]: C4A35D0B43: from=<>, size=2676, nrcp t=1 (queue active) Here's another example of something wrong. Oct 13 04:02:04 grizzy postfix/pickup[1462]: EFFAFD0B47: uid=0 from=<root> Oct 13 04:02:04 grizzy postfix/cleanup[1781]: EFFAFD0B47: message-id=<2003101308 0203.EFFAFD0B47@grizzy> Oct 13 04:02:04 grizzy postfix/nqmgr[1906]: EFFAFD0B47: from=<root(a)grizzy.grizzy >, size=1093, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Oct 13 04:02:06 grizzy postfix/smtp[1797]: EFFAFD0B47: to=<root(a)grizzy.grizzy>, relay=none, delay=3, status=bounced (Name service error for grizzy.grizzy: Host not found) Oct 13 04:02:06 grizzy postfix/cleanup[1781]: E295BD0B46: message-id=<2003101308 0206.E295BD0B46@grizzy> Oct 13 04:02:07 grizzy postfix/nqmgr[1906]: E295BD0B46: from=<>, size=2614, nrcp t=1 (queue active) Oct 13 04:02:07 grizzy postfix/smtp[1797]: E295BD0B46: to=<root(a)grizzy.grizzy>, relay=none, delay=1, status=bounced (Name service error for grizzy.grizzy: Host not found) Overall, mail handling seems to work. Stuff gets out, stuff comes in, spam gets tagged. But I need to clean some of this up.

Oct. 16, 2003

Re: [Wlug] Fw: RE: show

by Matthew Kwiatkowski

I think this sounds like it's turning into an interesting idea. I would be willing to help out as a cameraman or something behind the scenes, and I do have a laptop with video out, but I would need a ride from campus to the studio. I will also be home on break the week of the 21st, so I can't make that night. -Matthew Kwiatkowski On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 13:39, Yury I Vashugin wrote: > tim, > it seems like we don't have enough people to run the show. maybe > different date and time would be more appropriate for people(depending, > of course, on the studio availability)... > first, we need people to produce the show. it's a commitment of half an > hour ones? a month.(could be ones in two months) is there anyone who > would like to join the venture? > second, we need a qualified show host who will lead the show and > interview guests. i'm a new to linux and i would not dare to discuss it > with my expertize. > third, there is little problem with scan converter which can be replaced > by a notebook with a video output. > a tape of the show will be available immediately after the show and can > be broadcast on any channel(depending on the amount of money, sponsorship > etc; public access channels are free). also it's a good learning tool > which can be multiplied and offered to the public. i still remember a > hot discussion on wlug about introducing linux in public schools. i was > astonished to see how college students buy c compilers for windows to do > their homework for unix/c class. isn't it something? > they know about linux but, o boy, they're scared of it!!!(wow, wow- i'm > not talking about wpi students) > good point was brought by goug. we need to know what audience we are > going to target and where. if we start the show with linux introduction > and discuss the difference between linux and commonly used operating > systems, to get people intrigued, and continuously refer people to 'that > show' then they'll know the connection, how to obtain previous > educational tapes etc. > yury > ps keep forgeting to indicate the studio location- shewsbury media > connection, parker rd. > > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:40:51 -0400 Andy Stewart <andystewart(a)comcast.net> > writes: > > On Tuesday 14 October 2003 12:55 pm, Yury I Vashugin wrote: > > > hi, everyone. > > > since we talked about producing an educational show about linux > > and > > > putting it 'in-the-air' at the last wlug meeting and i saw a very > > > enthusiastic response so i've reserved the studio for oct.21(see > > below). > > > there's a problem with a converter but i'm sure we can find a > > laptop with > > > a video output. > > > > HI everybody, > > > > I'm still quite enthusiastic about this opportunity, but > > unfortunately I > > cannot make it on October 21st (Tuesday is generally a bad night for > > me). I > > will be looking forward to reading the e-mails from people who do > > make it on > > that date. > > > > Please keep us posted! > > > > Andy > > > > -- > > Andy Stewart, Founder > > Worcester Linux Users' Group > > Worcester, MA USA > > http://www.wlug.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wlug mailing list > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! > Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! > Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

Oct. 16, 2003