- WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

by E Johnson

PM Thanks. Please try to remember not to allow these commercial websites access to your Contacts List unless you are sure they aren't gong to use your entire contacts list. Apparently one of your Contants was WLUG (did you "select" or "allow" that?), which then spammed EVERY WLUG mailing list member. Maybe t's not totally a Linkedin issue. Mybe you gave too-broad permissions to this entity. The result was Spam to every WLUG member, via the WLUG mailing list. Thanks for coming back to this. But please watch out in the future. Mailing lists should not be "members" of our general contacts lists. Make these list-addresses in a separate group & don't allow to be shared. Thanks, Liz J On 2 April 2012 19:17, Aljerin Butler,Jr. <albutlerjr(a)yahoo.com> wrote: Hello all, > > This is a LinkedIn issue. I selected several people to connect to and > LinkedIn "sneaked in" the rest of my address book contacts. On the original > invitation presented by LinkedIn, I assumed that the half dozen or so > contacts I saw were all there was. I didn't notice if there were any > additional pages from which to select contacts ("Next" button). > > Al Butler > > ------------------------------ > *From:* "wlug-request(a)mail.wlug.org" <wlug-request(a)mail.wlug.org> > *To:* wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > *Sent:* Friday, March 23, 2012 9:41 PM > *Subject:* Wlug Digest, Vol 101, Issue 6 > > ----- Forwarded Message ----- > > Send Wlug mailing list submissions to > wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > wlug-request(a)mail.wlug.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > wlug-owner(a)mail.wlug.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Wlug digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (Jason Couture) > 2. Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (E Johnson) > 3. Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (Eric Martin) > 4. Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (E Johnson) > 5. Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (Eric Martin) > Just need to be careful letting sites and apps go through your email > contacts. > On Mar 23, 2012 6:59 PM, "Eric Martin" <eric.joshua.martin(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > It was sent to the wlug mailing list. My guess is somebody gave their > address book to LinkedIn, the same thing happened with Facebook a few years > back, IIRC (or was that on another mailing list?) > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:33 PM, E Johnson <iris.gates(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Noooo! > > Did anyone else from WLUG receive this? If so, let's fix it. > > Please don't use the private WLUG mailing list contact info for > invitations to social sites! > > Al, please delete me from your Contacts immediately. > > WLUG: maybe some kind of Privacy statement should be posted on the WLUG > website (link on main page). I looked for some statement about how the > mailing list contacts should be private, but found none. Private mailing > lists are not for mining. > > Wrong, bad, no, please, no. My contact is not to be shared, not at any > time, for any reason. > > Thanks, > Liz J > > If what you are getting online is for free, you are not the customer, you > are the product. -Jonathan Zittrain, professor of Internet law (b. 1969) > > On 23 March 2012 18:14, Al Butler <albutlerjr(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > [image: LinkedIn] > > > > [image: Al Butler] > > *From Al Butler* > > Information Technology and Services Professional > Greater Boston Area > > > > I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. > > - Al > > > > Confirm that you know Al<https://www.linkedin.com/e/-guplyd-h05sfzre-19/isd/6412973860/N4Pmccpb/?hs=…> > > > > You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Unsubscribe<http://www.linkedin.com/e/-guplyd-h05sfzre-19/uSTdRBL8TntbriFQlbXcoPTDk9Qxi…> > © 2012, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct. Mountain View, CA 94043, > USA > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > > -- > Eric Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > My guess is somebody gave their address book to LinkedIn > > Obviously so. > > Jason also commented: > > > Just need to be careful letting sites and apps go through your email > contacts > > Not just "be careful" but more like: "Do Not allow" sites and apps any > access to your email contacts at all. > > Ppls contact info is not owned by whoever has the person in their Contacts > list. > > Maybe a link could be added to the WLUG mailing list signup page, sending > a proposed (requesting-to-join) WLUG mailing list member to a page stating > Privacy policy (non-share contacts info). If a proposed (requesting) > mailing list member must read Privacy policy, then agree (click Yes to > Agree) before becoming a member of the mailing list, maybe it would prevent > the idea that Contact lists can be so casually given away. > > Liz J > To clarify Liz, Linked In doesn't have your email address. They have > wlug(a)wlug.org, and that contact opened X hundred emails. > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:21 PM, E Johnson <iris.gates(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > My guess is somebody gave their address book to LinkedIn > > Obviously so. > > Jason also commented: > > > > Just need to be careful letting sites and apps go through your email > contacts > > Not just "be careful" but more like: "Do Not allow" sites and apps any > access to your email contacts at all. > > Ppls contact info is not owned by whoever has the person in their Contacts > list. > > Maybe a link could be added to the WLUG mailing list signup page, sending > a proposed (requesting-to-join) WLUG mailing list member to a page stating > Privacy policy (non-share contacts info). If a proposed (requesting) > mailing list member must read Privacy policy, then agree (click Yes to > Agree) before becoming a member of the mailing list, maybe it would prevent > the idea that Contact lists can be so casually given away. > > Liz J > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > > -- > Eric Martin > I should have made that more clear. > > Mail-list address or not, Iit still is not okay to give the WLUG email > address to any other entities whatsoever. Someone shared the WLUG a > mailing address with a certain social/commercial website. Then > secondhandedly WLUG mailing list contacted x number of individual > contacts on behalf of the social/commercial website The message > included a direct link to this commercial website. List members were > invited to click on this link, or else to click on the UNsubscribe > link. > > Even sharing the WLUG contact address with outside entities is Non-OK. > We all got Spammed because someone decided it was okay to give our > email to ___.com.. > > Liz J > > If what you are getting online is for free, you are not the customer, > you are the product. -Jonathan Zittrain, professor of Internet law (b. > 1969) > > On 23 March 2012 21:09, Eric Martin <eric.joshua.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > To clarify Liz, Linked In doesn't have your email address. They have > > wlug(a)wlug.org, and that contact opened X hundred emails. > > > > > I agree it's not ok to share your address book, but accidents happen. > That, and I was more getting at the fact that X service doesn't have our > individual email addresses. > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:34 PM, E Johnson <iris.gates(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I should have made that more clear. > > Mail-list address or not, Iit still is not okay to give the WLUG email > address to any other entities whatsoever. Someone shared the WLUG a > mailing address with a certain social/commercial website. Then > secondhandedly WLUG mailing list contacted x number of individual > contacts on behalf of the social/commercial website The message > included a direct link to this commercial website. List members were > invited to click on this link, or else to click on the UNsubscribe > link. > > Even sharing the WLUG contact address with outside entities is Non-OK. > We all got Spammed because someone decided it was okay to give our > email to ___.com.. > > Liz J > > If what you are getting online is for free, you are not the customer, > you are the product. -Jonathan Zittrain, professor of Internet law (b. > 1969) > > On 23 March 2012 21:09, Eric Martin <eric.joshua.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > To clarify Liz, Linked In doesn't have your email address. They have > > wlug(a)wlug.org, and that contact opened X hundred emails. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > > -- > Eric Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > >

April 3, 2012

Re: [Wlug] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

by Aljerin Butler,Jr.

Hello all, This is a LinkedIn issue. I selected several people to connect to and LinkedIn "sneaked in" the rest of my address book contacts. On the original invitation presented by LinkedIn, I assumed that the half dozen or so contacts I saw were all there was. I didn't notice if there were any additional pages from which to select contacts ("Next" button). Al Butler >________________________________ > From: "wlug-request(a)mail.wlug.org" <wlug-request(a)mail.wlug.org> >To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 9:41 PM >Subject: Wlug Digest, Vol 101, Issue 6 > >----- Forwarded Message ----- > >Send Wlug mailing list submissions to > wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > wlug-request(a)mail.wlug.org > >You can reach the person managing the list at > wlug-owner(a)mail.wlug.org > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Wlug digest..." > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (Jason Couture) > 2. Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (E Johnson) > 3. Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (Eric Martin) > 4. Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (E Johnson) > 5. Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (Eric Martin) > >Just need to be careful letting sites and apps go through your email contacts. >On Mar 23, 2012 6:59 PM, "Eric Martin" <eric.joshua.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >It was sent to the wlug mailing list. My guess is somebody gave their address book to LinkedIn, the same thing happened with Facebook a few years back, IIRC (or was that on another mailing list?) >> >> >>On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:33 PM, E Johnson <iris.gates(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>Noooo! >>> >>>Did anyone else from WLUG receive this? If so, let's fix it. >>> >>>Please don't use the private WLUG mailing list contact info for invitations to social sites! >>> >>>Al, please delete me from your Contacts immediately. >>> >>>WLUG: maybe some kind of Privacy statement should be posted on the WLUG website (link on main page). I looked for some statement about how the mailing list contacts should be private, but found none. Private mailing lists are not for mining. >>> >>>Wrong, bad, no, please, no. My contact is not to be shared, not at any time, for any reason. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Liz J >>> >>>If what you are getting online is for free, you are not the customer, you are the product. -Jonathan Zittrain, professor of Internet law (b. 1969) >>> >>> >>>On 23 March 2012 18:14, Al Butler <albutlerjr(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From Al Butler >>>> >>>>Information Technology and Services Professional >>>>Greater Boston Area >>>> >>>> >>>> I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. >>>> >>>>- Al >>>> >>>> >>>>Confirm that you know Al >>>> >>>> >>>>You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Unsubscribe >>>>© 2012, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct. Mountain View, CA 94043, USA >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Wlug mailing list >>>>Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>>>http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >>>> >>>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Wlug mailing list >>>Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>>http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >>> >>> >> >> >> >>-- >>Eric Martin >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Wlug mailing list >>Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> >> >> My guess is somebody gave their address book to LinkedIn > >Obviously so. > >Jason also commented: > >> Just need to be careful letting sites and apps go through your email contacts > >Not just "be careful" but more like: "Do Not allow" sites and apps any access to your email contacts at all. > >Ppls contact info is not owned by whoever has the person in their Contacts list. > >Maybe a link could be added to the WLUG mailing list signup page, sending a proposed (requesting-to-join) WLUG mailing list member to a page stating Privacy policy (non-share contacts info). If a proposed (requesting) mailing list member must read Privacy policy, then agree (click Yes to Agree) before becoming a member of the mailing list, maybe it would prevent the idea that Contact lists can be so casually given away. > >Liz J > >To clarify Liz, Linked In doesn't have your email address. They have wlug(a)wlug.org, and that contact opened X hundred emails. > > >On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:21 PM, E Johnson <iris.gates(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> My guess is somebody gave their address book to LinkedIn >> >>Obviously so. >> >>Jason also commented: >> >> >>> Just need to be careful letting sites and apps go through your email contacts >> >>Not just "be careful" but more like: "Do Not allow" sites and apps any access to your email contacts at all. >> >>Ppls contact info is not owned by whoever has the person in their Contacts list. >> >>Maybe a link could be added to the WLUG mailing list signup page, sending a proposed (requesting-to-join) WLUG mailing list member to a page stating Privacy policy (non-share contacts info). If a proposed (requesting) mailing list member must read Privacy policy, then agree (click Yes to Agree) before becoming a member of the mailing list, maybe it would prevent the idea that Contact lists can be so casually given away. >> >>Liz J >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Wlug mailing list >>Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> >> > > > >-- >Eric Martin >I should have made that more clear. > >Mail-list address or not, Iit still is not okay to give the WLUG email >address to any other entities whatsoever. Someone shared the WLUG a >mailing address with a certain social/commercial website. Then >secondhandedly WLUG mailing list contacted x number of individual >contacts on behalf of the social/commercial website The message >included a direct link to this commercial website. List members were >invited to click on this link, or else to click on the UNsubscribe >link. > >Even sharing the WLUG contact address with outside entities is Non-OK. >We all got Spammed because someone decided it was okay to give our >email to ___.com.. > >Liz J > >If what you are getting online is for free, you are not the customer, >you are the product. -Jonathan Zittrain, professor of Internet law (b. >1969) > >On 23 March 2012 21:09, Eric Martin <eric.joshua.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> To clarify Liz, Linked In doesn't have your email address. They have >> wlug(a)wlug.org, and that contact opened X hundred emails. >> > > > >I agree it's not ok to share your address book, but accidents happen. That, and I was more getting at the fact that X service doesn't have our individual email addresses. > > >On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:34 PM, E Johnson <iris.gates(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >I should have made that more clear. >> >>Mail-list address or not, Iit still is not okay to give the WLUG email >>address to any other entities whatsoever. Someone shared the WLUG a >>mailing address with a certain social/commercial website. Then >>secondhandedly WLUG mailing list contacted x number of individual >>contacts on behalf of the social/commercial website The message >>included a direct link to this commercial website. List members were >>invited to click on this link, or else to click on the UNsubscribe >>link. >> >>Even sharing the WLUG contact address with outside entities is Non-OK. >>We all got Spammed because someone decided it was okay to give our >>email to ___.com.. >> >> >>Liz J >> >>If what you are getting online is for free, you are not the customer, >>you are the product. -Jonathan Zittrain, professor of Internet law (b. >>1969) >> >> >>On 23 March 2012 21:09, Eric Martin <eric.joshua.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> To clarify Liz, Linked In doesn't have your email address. They have >>> wlug(a)wlug.org, and that contact opened X hundred emails. >>> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Wlug mailing list >>Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> > > > >-- >Eric Martin > >_______________________________________________ >Wlug mailing list >Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > >

April 2, 2012

Announce: April WLUG Meeting: ZFS: Changed time/location

by Chuck Anderson

Hi folks, This month, the Worcester Linux Users' Group (WLUG) monthly meeting will be held on THURSDAY instead of the usual Wednesday, and the meeting will be starting promptly at 7PM since we must finish and be out of the room by 8PM. Additionally, the location is different this month: Thursday, April 12, 7:00 - 8:00 PM WPI Campus Center, Mid-Century Room (room 331) Longtime WLUG member Tim Keller will be talking about ZFS, the Zettabyte FileSystem for Oracle Solaris and FreeBSD (ports available for Linux too). I'm sure there will be a demo as well. Afterwards, we will go out for pizza and continue our discussions. See you there, Chuck President, Worcester Linux Users' Group

April 2, 2012

Re: [Wlug] Talk for April... Thursday April 12?

by David Glaser

works for me. On 3/29/2012 9:08 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > How would people feel about having the April meeting on Thursday April > 12 instead of Wednesday April 11? I won't be available on Wednesday. > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 08:51:47AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: >> Thanks Tim, I think an offical ZFS talk would be great. I'll update >> the website and IRC channel. >> >> Chuck >> >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:14:01PM -0400, Tim Keller wrote: >>> I believe the previous talk was about btrfs and compared it to zfs. I >>> would consider this talk a stand alone talk that would focus on the >>> features of zfs. >>> >>> Though my head's really full of noise. It's quite possible I did a >>> talk about zfs and don't even remember! >>> >>> Later, >>> Tim. >>> >>> On 3/27/12, James Gray<jamespgray(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I'd like to hear more about ZFS. As you know there was a previous >>>> presentation on ZFS as well, so it would be nice to cover some new ground. >>>> I'd like to see some ZFS in action. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, David Glaser >>>> <dglaser(a)glaserresearch.net>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sounds good to me! >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> On 3/26/2012 12:33 PM, Tim Keller wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey Everybody, >>>>> >>>>> At the last meeting, there was some talk about ZFS... >>>>> >>>>> Would people be interested in me doing a talk about ZFS? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Tim. > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

March 30, 2012

Re: [Wlug] Talk for April... Thursday April 12?

by James Gray

Works for me. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Chuck Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> wrote: > How would people feel about having the April meeting on Thursday April > 12 instead of Wednesday April 11? I won't be available on Wednesday. > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 08:51:47AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Thanks Tim, I think an offical ZFS talk would be great. I'll update > > the website and IRC channel. > > > > Chuck > > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:14:01PM -0400, Tim Keller wrote: > > > I believe the previous talk was about btrfs and compared it to zfs. I > > > would consider this talk a stand alone talk that would focus on the > > > features of zfs. > > > > > > Though my head's really full of noise. It's quite possible I did a > > > talk about zfs and don't even remember! > > > > > > Later, > > > Tim. > > > > > > On 3/27/12, James Gray <jamespgray(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'd like to hear more about ZFS. As you know there was a previous > > > > presentation on ZFS as well, so it would be nice to cover some new > ground. > > > > I'd like to see some ZFS in action. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, David Glaser > > > > <dglaser(a)glaserresearch.net>wrote: > > > > > > > >> Sounds good to me! > > > >> > > > >> -David > > > >> > > > >> On 3/26/2012 12:33 PM, Tim Keller wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hey Everybody, > > > >> > > > >> At the last meeting, there was some talk about ZFS... > > > >> > > > >> Would people be interested in me doing a talk about ZFS? > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Tim. > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

March 29, 2012

Talk for April... Thursday April 12?

by Chuck Anderson

How would people feel about having the April meeting on Thursday April 12 instead of Wednesday April 11? I won't be available on Wednesday. On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 08:51:47AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Thanks Tim, I think an offical ZFS talk would be great. I'll update > the website and IRC channel. > > Chuck > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:14:01PM -0400, Tim Keller wrote: > > I believe the previous talk was about btrfs and compared it to zfs. I > > would consider this talk a stand alone talk that would focus on the > > features of zfs. > > > > Though my head's really full of noise. It's quite possible I did a > > talk about zfs and don't even remember! > > > > Later, > > Tim. > > > > On 3/27/12, James Gray <jamespgray(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'd like to hear more about ZFS. As you know there was a previous > > > presentation on ZFS as well, so it would be nice to cover some new ground. > > > I'd like to see some ZFS in action. > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, David Glaser > > > <dglaser(a)glaserresearch.net>wrote: > > > > > >> Sounds good to me! > > >> > > >> -David > > >> > > >> On 3/26/2012 12:33 PM, Tim Keller wrote: > > >> > > >> Hey Everybody, > > >> > > >> At the last meeting, there was some talk about ZFS... > > >> > > >> Would people be interested in me doing a talk about ZFS? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Tim.

March 29, 2012

Re: [Wlug] Talk for April...

by Chuck Anderson

Thanks Tim, I think an offical ZFS talk would be great. I'll update the website and IRC channel. Chuck On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:14:01PM -0400, Tim Keller wrote: > I believe the previous talk was about btrfs and compared it to zfs. I > would consider this talk a stand alone talk that would focus on the > features of zfs. > > Though my head's really full of noise. It's quite possible I did a > talk about zfs and don't even remember! > > Later, > Tim. > > On 3/27/12, James Gray <jamespgray(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd like to hear more about ZFS. As you know there was a previous > > presentation on ZFS as well, so it would be nice to cover some new ground. > > I'd like to see some ZFS in action. > > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, David Glaser > > <dglaser(a)glaserresearch.net>wrote: > > > >> Sounds good to me! > >> > >> -David > >> > >> On 3/26/2012 12:33 PM, Tim Keller wrote: > >> > >> Hey Everybody, > >> > >> At the last meeting, there was some talk about ZFS... > >> > >> Would people be interested in me doing a talk about ZFS? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Tim.

March 29, 2012

Re: [Wlug] Talk for April...

by Tim Keller

I believe the previous talk was about btrfs and compared it to zfs. I would consider this talk a stand alone talk that would focus on the features of zfs. Though my head's really full of noise. It's quite possible I did a talk about zfs and don't even remember! Later, Tim. On 3/27/12, James Gray <jamespgray(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to hear more about ZFS. As you know there was a previous > presentation on ZFS as well, so it would be nice to cover some new ground. > I'd like to see some ZFS in action. > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, David Glaser > <dglaser(a)glaserresearch.net>wrote: > >> Sounds good to me! >> >> -David >> >> On 3/26/2012 12:33 PM, Tim Keller wrote: >> >> Hey Everybody, >> >> At the last meeting, there was some talk about ZFS... >> >> Would people be interested in me doing a talk about ZFS? >> >> Thanks, >> Tim. >> -- >> I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their >> constituents as "consumers". >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wlug mailing >> listWlug@mail.wlug.orghttp://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wlug mailing list >> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> >> > -- Sent from my mobile device I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

March 29, 2012

Re: [Wlug] Talk for April...

by James Gray

I'd like to hear more about ZFS. As you know there was a previous presentation on ZFS as well, so it would be nice to cover some new ground. I'd like to see some ZFS in action. On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, David Glaser <dglaser(a)glaserresearch.net>wrote: > Sounds good to me! > > -David > > On 3/26/2012 12:33 PM, Tim Keller wrote: > > Hey Everybody, > > At the last meeting, there was some talk about ZFS... > > Would people be interested in me doing a talk about ZFS? > > Thanks, > Tim. > -- > I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their > constituents as "consumers". > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing listWlug@mail.wlug.orghttp://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > >

March 27, 2012

Re: [Wlug] Talk for April...

by David Glaser

Sounds good to me! -David On 3/26/2012 12:33 PM, Tim Keller wrote: > Hey Everybody, > > At the last meeting, there was some talk about ZFS... > > Would people be interested in me doing a talk about ZFS? > > Thanks, > Tim. > -- > I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their > constituents as "consumers". > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

March 26, 2012