August 2001 - WLUG - wlug.mailman3.com

Re: [Wlug] apache and SetOutputFilter

by Dan Potter

You're half-right: the SetOutputHandler option is apparently for Apache 2.0 and most people should still be using Apache 1.3. However, SSI (what .shtml files are) should still work with Apache 1.3. The relative configuration lines are: Options +Includes In the <Directory> block, and: AddType text/html .shtml AddHandler server-parsed .shtml Either also in the directory block or with the rest of the add type/handler statements. Since I haven't actually used SSI, I'll just send you to the appropriate Apache documentation for Apache 1.3, the version that comes with RedHat: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/howto/ssi.html Hope this helps :) On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Brad Noyes wrote: > i figured it out, i have an old versin of apache (well sorta i guess this is > only for apache 2.0) > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 03:24:39PM -0400, Brad Noyes wrote: > > Hi Fellas, > > I'm trying to configure apache to handle .shtml files. I don't know much about > > apache configuration, so i got some info from apache.org about this. > > i ended up with this config chunck > > # put in so we can use .shtml files in /home/httpd/includes > > <Directory "/home/httpd/includes"> > > Options +Includes > > # (took from http://www.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_include.html) > > <IfModule mod_include.c> > > AddType text/html .shtml > > <FilesMatch "\.shtml(\..+)?$"> > > SetOutputFilter INCLUDES > > </FilesMatch> > > </IfModule> > > </Directory> > > > > > > When i parse the config file i get this > > # httpd -t > > Syntax error on line 408 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: > > Invalid command 'SetOutputFilter', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration > > > > any suggestions here? i'm using the apache that came with red hat 7.0 > > Thanks, > > --Brad > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wlug mailing list > > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

Aug. 27, 2001

Re: [Wlug] apache and SetOutputFilter

by Brad Noyes

i figured it out, i have an old versin of apache (well sorta i guess this is only for apache 2.0) On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 03:24:39PM -0400, Brad Noyes wrote: > Hi Fellas, > I'm trying to configure apache to handle .shtml files. I don't know much about > apache configuration, so i got some info from apache.org about this. > i ended up with this config chunck > # put in so we can use .shtml files in /home/httpd/includes > <Directory "/home/httpd/includes"> > Options +Includes > # (took from http://www.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_include.html) > <IfModule mod_include.c> > AddType text/html .shtml > <FilesMatch "\.shtml(\..+)?$"> > SetOutputFilter INCLUDES > </FilesMatch> > </IfModule> > </Directory> > > > When i parse the config file i get this > # httpd -t > Syntax error on line 408 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: > Invalid command 'SetOutputFilter', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration > > any suggestions here? i'm using the apache that came with red hat 7.0 > Thanks, > --Brad > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

Aug. 27, 2001

apache and SetOutputFilter

by Brad Noyes

Hi Fellas, I'm trying to configure apache to handle .shtml files. I don't know much about apache configuration, so i got some info from apache.org about this. i ended up with this config chunck # put in so we can use .shtml files in /home/httpd/includes <Directory "/home/httpd/includes"> Options +Includes # (took from http://www.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_include.html) <IfModule mod_include.c> AddType text/html .shtml <FilesMatch "\.shtml(\..+)?$"> SetOutputFilter INCLUDES </FilesMatch> </IfModule> </Directory> When i parse the config file i get this # httpd -t Syntax error on line 408 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Invalid command 'SetOutputFilter', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration any suggestions here? i'm using the apache that came with red hat 7.0 Thanks, --Brad

Aug. 27, 2001

Re: [Wlug] SPARC pickup

by Josh Huber

Orbitz <orbitz(a)firest0rm.org> writes: > Just use pine guys, it asks you if you want to use reply-to address > or from address. personal, i can deal with deleteing e-mails i > dont' want, and i prefer it this way so that when somebody answers > somebodies question, i get to know how it was done incase i ever run > into it in the future. but tha tis just me. oh god, not someone suggesting pine! :P Reasonable email clients should have this configurable... for mutt: ignore_list_reply_to Type: boolean Default: no Affects the behaviour of the reply function when replying to messages from mailing lists. When set, if the "Reply-To:" field is set to the same value as the "To:" field, Mutt assumes that the "Reply- To:" field was set by the mailing list to automate responses to the list, and will ignore this field. To direct a response to the mailing list when this option is set, use the list-reply function; group- reply will reply to both the sender and the list. Mutt's a great console based email client, and I strongly reccommend it over pine. ttyl, -- Josh Huber

Aug. 24, 2001

Re: [Wlug] SPARC pickup

by Orbitz

Just use pine guys, it asks you if you want to use reply-to address or from address. personal, i can deal with deleteing e-mails i dont' want, and i prefer it this way so that when somebody answers somebodies question, i get to know how it was done incase i ever run into it in the future. but tha tis just me. Orbitz p.s. sorry this is so horribly typed, i'm sleepy

Aug. 24, 2001

Re: [Wlug] SPARC pickup

by John Stoffel

Fuck!! I just got burned by this stupid reply-to goes to the list, not the writer of the email. Chalk me up as one who is pissed by this setup too. John

Aug. 23, 2001

Re: [Wlug] SPARC pickup

by John Stoffel

A> Tuesday came and went ... the next times I can come by are A> Friday (8/24) or Monday (8/27). If either of these days work, A> please send directions and possible times. Thanks, Andrew Sorry, it's been a bad week, we just let go a bunch of people and I'm doing account lock downs, etc. Anyway, tomorrow after around 6pm would be fine, or monday after 6pm. Simple directions from Natick... Rt 90 West to Rt 495 North to Rt 290 West to Exit 23B, Rt 140 North to Go about 1.5 miles, turn left onto Sewall Street. Third Right onto "Long Leaf" First Left onto Fox Tail Way Fourth driveway on left, #25. 508-579-6331 (cell).

Aug. 23, 2001

SPARC pickup

by A. Perry

John, Tuesday came and went ... the next times I can come by are Friday (8/24) or Monday (8/27). If either of these days work, please send directions and possible times. Thanks, Andrew

Aug. 23, 2001

Embedded Systems Conference in Boston Sept 5-7

by Skip Gaede

I received the following from techies.com. You have received this email from techies.com on behalf of CMP Media because you are currently signed up to hear about local events from techies.com. Please proceed to the end of this email for instructions on how to manage your subscription. ************************************************************ Embedded Systems Conference Boston Sept. 5-7, 2001 Hynes Convention Center Boston, MA http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0Erv0AC The Embedded Systems Conference Boston is the largest exhibition on the East Coast for engineers and developers working with embedded systems. You can explore new tools and technologies than you can use as soon as you return to the office. Join us on the show floor to see embedded technologies such as embedded Internet tools, Java, RTOSes, Flash memory chips, and networking tools. Techies.com members can register for FREE admission to the product exhibition, the keynote addresses, and the opening night reception. **Use priority code VML when registering to get your free show pass. If you're not at ESC Boston, you'll miss: * A three-day exhibition featuring more than 200 companies. This is your chance to preview new embedded products and do all of your shopping under one roof. * Keynote Address, Wednesday, Sept. 5, 1 p.m. - 2 p.m. by Cliff Stoll, author of "The Cuckoo's Egg: Tracking a Spy Through the Maze of Computer Espionage." -- "Reflections of a Computer Contrarian." * Keynote Address, Thursday, Sept. 6, 12:30 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. by Michael Tiemann, CTO of Red Hat -- "Open Source in Embedded: Dilemma or Delight?" * Panel Discussion, Tuesday, Sept. 4, 4:45 p.m. - 6 p.m. moderated by Michael Barr, Editor-in-Chief, Embedded Systems Programming -- "Is Java Ready for Embedded Use?" Register today! http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0Erw0AD ---- Subscription Management ---- Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from techies.com newsletters GOTO: http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0DWb0AO To change your email address for all communications from techies.com, get your login information ready and GOTO: http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0EaS0AK Lost your login information? Go to: http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0BDE0AY If you need HELP using the site, or would like to offer feedback, please click the link below to send your request. We appreciate your input. A member advocate team member will respond to your request as soon as possible. http://info.techies.com/cgi-bin6/flo?y=eEXZ0BoFaa0BXf0BX50Ac

Aug. 23, 2001

Re: [Wlug] gettin' the Sparc Classic on the network...

by Brian J.Conway

> I'm a little paranoid with DHCP... at work I use dhcpcd because pump > doesn't work. At home (with road-runner), I use pump because dhcpcd > doesn't work. Am I on crack? Probably not (though there is room for error on that one). At work I've gotten neither pump nor ISC's dhcpclient to work on my laptop, but dhcpcd works perfectly. I haven't tried any others at WPI, as it worked there on the first try. I don't suppose anyone has a real explanation for flakiness between DHCP servers/clients, other than claiming that our Win2k DHCP server at work sucks (I already know THAT)? Brian J. Conway dogbert(a)clue4all.net "LINUX is obsolete" - Andrew S. Tanenbaum, creator of Minix

Aug. 22, 2001