6 Jun
2001
6 Jun
'01
11:45 a.m.
Bill Mills-Curran wrote: I missed that -n omission first time round :-( (thanks to Bill M-C for picking up on that!) so my comments about the last line's "default" being odd are wrong. As the route -n output shows, default is, indeed the 0.0.0.0 it should be. That first line still looks redundant to me. doug -- Douglas R Waud 17 Lantern Lane, Shrewsbury, MA, 01545-2006 http://www.ummed.edu/pub/d/drw/