Search results for "meeting" - WLUG

Re: Um..wow..

by Keith Wright

Tim Keller via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> writes: > I'm busy spinning up an Jitsi instance in Digital Ocean for tonight.. > the default Ubuntu 22.04 droplet.. needs 204 updates apply.. when it starts.. > I was just a bit surprised.. Is this very different from the way it has been done in the past? Is the address changing from https://meet.jit.si/WlugMA ? That address seems to still be there. I just tried to join the meeting and it didn't say 404, it said "wait for moderator?". I hope to join tonight via Jitsi. In the past I have done that by borrowing a Windows computer that has a earplug/mike jack and has been used for Zoom. I thought the computer was for doing computations and never put much thought or effort into watching TV on it, but I have obtained a pair of USB headphones w/ attached microphone, and have been playing with it (them) and finding the buttons and setup menus. It seems to work. So I will be joining (if at all) with a Genuine Linux(TM) laptop. The big advantage of that, besides proof-of-concept, is that I might be able to screen-share and show people what I have been computing. CU7PM, -- Keith

1 week, 6 days

Re: Reminder! Next meeting April 11th, 2024 Topic: TBD, xz, net_filter, etc..

by John Stoffel

Sorry guys, I can't make it this month to the meeting, enjoy it without me!

2 weeks, 1 day

Reminder! Next meeting April 11th, 2024 Topic: TBD, xz, net_filter, etc..

by Tim Keller

Hey Gang, We've got a meeting next week on the 11th! Location: Technocopia, 44 Portland St. Worcester MA Time: 7PM Virtual Location: TBD.. Topic: TBD, though there's a whole bunch of security stuff to talk about! Obviously, we'd all be remiss if we didn't talk about xz. We should also talk about kernel root bug as well: https://pwning.tech/nftables/ Beyond that, I'm sure we'll get off on a bunch of different topics. If there's something you want to talk about, by all means bring it up! As usual, we'll have snacks and refreshments available and we'll head off for dinner and continue the conversation! Later, Tim. -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

2 weeks, 5 days

Re: ISPS limiting..was Re: Meeting next week! March 14th 2024!

by Cara Salter

On 3/17/24 04:52, Michael Voorhis via WLUG wrote: > Outgoing SMTP is not blocked and will function, but is frequently > blacklisted by recipients who refuse to accept email originating from a > residential IP block. I have a relay in Amazon-EC2 that sends the > email. Some recipients continue to not like that, but doing > SPF/DKIM/DMARC goes a long way, and I've had no trouble sending to > recipients at gmail and at various MS outlook/o365ish recipients. +1 to SPF/DKIM/DMARC dealing with a lot of challenges related to selfhosting email. I'm not using my residential IP, but they're still really easy to set up for a large payoff. > > The biggest issue I have is that if the cablemodem goes offline for a > long enough time, my IP address changes. But I've got by now a > well-established checklist of stuff that I need to do when the house IP > changes, so I just walk through the list and all is well in a few > minutes. Decent email senders will queue the bounced email for a few > days before bouncing back to sender and I'm not aware of having lost > anything. I've found that OctoDNS + iCinga pair well for both detecting when my external IP changes, and getting fresh DNS records out quickly. I wonder how difficult it'd be to figure out some automation to do it all for me... --cs

1 month, 1 week

Re: ISPS limiting..was Re: Meeting next week! March 14th 2024!

by Michael Voorhis

Outgoing SMTP is not blocked and will function, but is frequently blacklisted by recipients who refuse to accept email originating from a residential IP block. I have a relay in Amazon-EC2 that sends the email. Some recipients continue to not like that, but doing SPF/DKIM/DMARC goes a long way, and I've had no trouble sending to recipients at gmail and at various MS outlook/o365ish recipients. The biggest issue I have is that if the cablemodem goes offline for a long enough time, my IP address changes. But I've got by now a well-established checklist of stuff that I need to do when the house IP changes, so I just walk through the list and all is well in a few minutes. Decent email senders will queue the bounced email for a few days before bouncing back to sender and I'm not aware of having lost anything. --MCV. > I think the answer is "it depends". As Mike Voorhis says, his home > stuff just works. And I certainly allow incoming SSH and other > traffic to my home network. I honestly haven't tested if they > block outgoing SMTP (port 25 traffic) recently, but checking now, > they don't seem to be blocking it since I could get to my VPS on port > 25 from home no problem.

1 month, 1 week

Re: ISPS limiting..was Re: Meeting next week! March 14th 2024!

by Tim Keller

This is the alcohol on the beach clause.. Become a pain in the ass and they'll point to clause L on their website and kill your access. It's interesting there's no SSH on that list.. What is also interesting is that they don't want you running squid.. because I think they don't want people blocking ads.. Tim. On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:36 PM John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org> wrote: > > I think the answer is "it depends". As Mike Voorhis says, his home > stuff just works. And I certainly allow incoming SSH and other > traffic to my home network. I honestly haven't tested if they block > outgoing SMTP (port 25 traffic) recently, but checking now, they don't > seem to be blocking it since I could get to my VPS on port 25 from > home no problem. > > I *have* been slowly working to get Wireguard setup at home so I can > tunnel over a VPN to my VPS to make some things simpler, so I just > have one end-point on my OPNsense Firewall at home which allows > connections from remote devices into my network. This way I don't > need quite as many firewall rules on OPNSense. At least that's the > idea, but lack of time and bugs have slowed my progress here. > > > I could swear I read before, at least for residential services that > > Charter (now Spectrum) internet did NOT allow you to host a site > > which is why I have never tried to do it. I would guess that its > > all about the bandwidth dollars. Below is a link to their current > > TOS (terms of service) in case it is of interest: > > I think if you start hosting something that gets their attention, > they'll shut you down. *shrug* not really sure. > -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

1 month, 1 week

Re: ISPS limiting..was Re: Meeting next week! March 14th 2024!

by John Stoffel

I think the answer is "it depends". As Mike Voorhis says, his home stuff just works. And I certainly allow incoming SSH and other traffic to my home network. I honestly haven't tested if they block outgoing SMTP (port 25 traffic) recently, but checking now, they don't seem to be blocking it since I could get to my VPS on port 25 from home no problem. I *have* been slowly working to get Wireguard setup at home so I can tunnel over a VPN to my VPS to make some things simpler, so I just have one end-point on my OPNsense Firewall at home which allows connections from remote devices into my network. This way I don't need quite as many firewall rules on OPNSense. At least that's the idea, but lack of time and bugs have slowed my progress here. > I could swear I read before, at least for residential services that > Charter (now Spectrum) internet did NOT allow you to host a site > which is why I have never tried to do it. I would guess that its > all about the bandwidth dollars. Below is a link to their current > TOS (terms of service) in case it is of interest: I think if you start hosting something that gets their attention, they'll shut you down. *shrug* not really sure.

1 month, 1 week

Re: ISPS limiting..was Re: Meeting next week! March 14th 2024!

by Keith Wright

Cara Salter via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> writes: > Funnily enough, I get a 403 error when I try to view that page. Last I > remember it allowed services for private use. > -------- Original Message -------- > From: THE HAMMER via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> > https://www.spectrum.com/policies/internet-use-policy I get a page titled: Spectrum Internet Acceptable Use Policy, which says, in part: 2. Prohibited Activities Using the System, Network, and Service. Any activity or use of the Service which violates system or network security or integrity are prohibited and may result in criminal and civil liability. Such violations include, without limitation, the following: L. Running any type of server on the system that is not consistent with personal, residential use. This includes but is not limited to FTP, IRC, SMTP, POP, HTTP, SOCS, SQUID, NTP, DNS or any multi-user forums. So they threaten you with jail time for listening on port 25. PHLHT!! -- Keith

1 month, 1 week

Re: ISPS limiting..was Re: Meeting next week! March 14th 2024!

by Michael Voorhis

I've had my house-server on the internet via Charter Spectrum for many many years. I send and receive (a tiny amt of) email, there's a webserver, and other small items. I've made no attempt to conceal any of this. --MCV. On 3/14/24 10:14 AM, THE HAMMER via WLUG wrote: > I could swear I read before, at least for residential services that > Charter (now Spectrum) internet did NOT allow you to host a site > which is why I have never tried to do it. I would guess that its all > about the bandwidth dollars.

1 month, 1 week

Re: ISPS limiting..was Re: Meeting next week! March 14th 2024!

by Cara Salter

Funnily enough, I get a 403 error when I try to view that page. Last I remember it allowed services for private use. --cs -------- Original Message -------- From: THE HAMMER via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> Sent: March 15, 2024 1:14:21 AM GMT+11:00 To: John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org>, Worcester Linux Users' Group General Discussion <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> Cc: Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us>, Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com>, THE HAMMER <hammerron(a)hotmail.com> Subject: [WLUG] Re: ISPS limiting..was Re: Meeting next week! March 14th 2024! Tim, I could swear I read before, at least for residential services that Charter (now Spectrum) internet did NOT allow you to host a site which is why I have never tried to do it. I would guess that its all about the bandwidth dollars. Below is a link to their current TOS (terms of service) in case it is of interest: Ron https://www.spectrum.com/policies/internet-use-policy [https://www.spectrum.com/content/spectrum/residential/en/policies/internet-…]<https://www.spectrum.com/policies/internet-use-policy> Spectrum - Internet Use Policy<https://www.spectrum.com/policies/internet-use-policy> Learn about our Internet Use Policy for Spectrum Internet® and data subscription. www.spectrum.com ________________________________ From: Tim Keller via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2024 6:34 AM To: John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org> Cc: Worcester Linux Users' Group General Discussion <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org>; Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us>; Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> Subject: [WLUG] Re: Meeting next week! March 14th 2024! I knew this topic would be of interest to people! As I'm writing this Gmail is yelling at me to buy more storage.. For me the "self" is the level of control I have over it. Lately ISP's have gone out of their way to make it very hard to host services on your own networks and expose them to the internet. Tim. On Wed, Mar 13, 2024, 3:47 PM John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org<mailto:john@stoffel.org>> wrote: >>>>> "Keith" == Keith Wright via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org<mailto:wlug@lists.wlug.org>> writes: > Tim Keller via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org<mailto:wlug@lists.wlug.org>> writes: >> >> We've got a meeting next week! > I hope to tune in via jit.si<http://jit.si> >> I think it's really worth talking about Self hosting. > I'm not quite sure what you mean by "Self". For twenty years I had a > DSL connection with a static routable IPv4 address. I had an intenet > host with Tandy Monitor that ran a name server, mail server, and web > server. That's all broken now because the ISP no longer does DSL. That's certainly a definite form of self hosting! When you run your own internet infrastructure (http, mail, ftp, ssh) that's you doing the work and keeping the control. > Instead I pay $10 month for a VPS (Virtual Private Server) from > AfterBurst, which comes with an IP address. Pretty much everything > that used to be in my basement is now in "the cloud". It's not > "Self" because its not my computer, but almost everything else is > the same. AfterBurst does not do anything, just let me use their > computer to do it myself. I do this too with a Linode Droplet ($5/mo) but I'm thinking I should upgrade to something with more CPU and Memory so I can run some better anti-spam tools. > The main problem I am dealing with now is that the internal (in home) > network is notwork. I have been keeping notes and put them here: That sucks! > http://www.free-comp-shop.com/none/ipv6.html > I am trying to use IPv6, which I have never done before. If anybody > has any suggestions... I've tried as well in the past, with the big issue for me being getting from IPv6 internally to a (mostly) IPv4 network outside. I think IPv6 probably works better as a gateway to your home, since you can then assign multiple distinct IPs to your own block of 64 (or whatever the count it) of internal IPs and make them visible to the outside. So it removes NATing and such. But IPv6 just is a pain to do. I keep reading that Charter/Spectrum offers IPv6 IPs, but I haven't made the leap. Still working on my wireguard setup, which has falled to the side lately. [https://s-install.avcdn.net/ipm/preview/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-…]<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_cam…> Virus-free.www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_cam…>

1 month, 1 week

WLUG search results for query "meeting"