Search results for "meeting" - WLUG

Re: [Wlug] meeting next week?

by Andy Stewart

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Eric Stein wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm only writing to ask whether or not there will be a meeting held on > the 3rd and if we have a topic. Thanks. > Hi Eric et al, The website says May 10th (but I haven't yet updated the home page). There is currently no scheduled topic for the May meeting. We do have a topic for the June meeting (a rep from Sybase will give the talk). I have lots of goodies from Sybase to give away at that meeting (thanks Sybase!). I'll try to get the website updated within the next day. Andy - -- Andy Stewart, Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group Worcester, MA, USA http://www.wlug.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFETpMPHl0iXDssISsRAiwvAJ9orMhoVudi2hzxubaUkdYLcWYWlQCfZvvC Y60GVTZjcDaF9dDJFefrThs= =aG8C -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

18 years

meeting next week?

by Eric Stein

Hi all, I'm only writing to ask whether or not there will be a meeting held on the 3rd and if we have a topic. Thanks. -- Eric Stein WPI CS 2009 Treasurer, Student Pugwash

18 years

Re: [Wlug] Ubuntu vs Kubuntu

by brad

On Thursday 20 April 2006 20:12, Mike wrote: > At the last meeting someone mentioned some kind of fallout between Ubuntu > and Kubuntu. I missed most the details and was wondering if anyone had a > link to an article that explains this. I have been searching, but Google > isn't playing nice today. > for some reason i get the impression that this dispute has passed and been resolved. calling it a fallout would be an exaggeration. although if you're interested I would suggest reading comments and posts from those involved in the dispute. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/2006-April/004871.html http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/1917 the lead developer of kubuntu was recently interviewed, though that topic didn't come up, it was brough up in the comments of the story on dot.kde.org, which is where i got the above links from. http://behindubuntu.org/interviews/JonathanRiddell/ http://dot.kde.org/1144898425/ -- brad

18 years

Re: [Wlug] Ubuntu vs Kubuntu

by Andre Lehovich

> At the last meeting someone mentioned some kind of fallout between Ubuntu > and Kubuntu. I missed most the details and was wondering if anyone had a > link to an article that explains this. I have been searching, but Google > isn't playing nice today. Linux Weekly News had a blurb about it: http://lwn.net/Articles/179628/ --Andre __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

18 years

Re: [Wlug] Ubuntu vs Kubuntu

by Adam Keck

Here is an article from Google news: http://www.tectonic.co.za/view.php?id=962 -Adam On Apr 20, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Mike wrote: > At the last meeting someone mentioned some kind of fallout between > Ubuntu > and Kubuntu. I missed most the details and was wondering if anyone had > a > link to an article that explains this. I have been searching, but > Google > isn't playing nice today. > > Thanks, > Mike > > > -- > Emacs would be a far better OS if it shipped with a halfway-decent text > editor. --Anonymous > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

18 years

Ubuntu vs Kubuntu

by Mike

At the last meeting someone mentioned some kind of fallout between Ubuntu and Kubuntu. I missed most the details and was wondering if anyone had a link to an article that explains this. I have been searching, but Google isn't playing nice today. Thanks, Mike -- Emacs would be a far better OS if it shipped with a halfway-decent text editor. --Anonymous

18 years

Re: [Wlug] How fast is your CD burner with Linux ?

by Robert L Krawitz

Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:52:17 -0400 From: Andy Stewart <andystewart(a)comcast.net> I asked this question at the most recent WLUG meeting. I've noticed that my CD burner (according to K3B) averages about 24X, even though it is advertised as a 48X CD burner. Is this to be expected, or do I have a cheap(er) drive that can't sustain the data rate? It is an IDE/ATAPI drive (NEC3550). It takes approx. 4 minutes for me to burn a 700MB CD (including some fiddling and diddling about calibrating power, fixating, etc). I use Memorex CD-R media (52X, 700MB, 80 min). I'm curious about your CD buring experiences, especially if they are faster than mine. I'd like to know what drive you have, the media you use, and most importantly, how did you determine your drive speed? CD's burn faster (in MB/sec) near the outside of the disc than near the inside, and they're burned from inside out. So they're always going to start slow and speed up. I have a 48x drive, and if I'm burning a full disc (where the CD is capable of that) it reaches something close to that near the end of the disc. At the beginning it's more like 16x; it averages maybe 25-30x for the whole disc, exclusive of fixating, power calibration, etc. 4 minutes net for a 700 MB CD sounds about right to me. -- Robert Krawitz <rlk(a)alum.mit.edu> Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf(a)uunet.uu.net Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton

18 years

How fast is your CD burner with Linux ?

by Andy Stewart

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HI everybody, I asked this question at the most recent WLUG meeting. I've noticed that my CD burner (according to K3B) averages about 24X, even though it is advertised as a 48X CD burner. Is this to be expected, or do I have a cheap(er) drive that can't sustain the data rate? It is an IDE/ATAPI drive (NEC3550). It takes approx. 4 minutes for me to burn a 700MB CD (including some fiddling and diddling about calibrating power, fixating, etc). I use Memorex CD-R media (52X, 700MB, 80 min). I'm curious about your CD buring experiences, especially if they are faster than mine. I'd like to know what drive you have, the media you use, and most importantly, how did you determine your drive speed? Thanks, Andy - -- Andy Stewart, Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group Worcester, MA, USA http://www.wlug.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEQDWxHl0iXDssISsRAleKAJ9te/Y/JJJilRrsM7l3iHSwO3H9qwCfanO+ y6iI3UzEL8uI6wnYM8yfWYU= =lp+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

18 years

Re: [Wlug] Meeting topic

by John Stoffel

Eric> The stands on the two LCDs are not built for this. It sounds Eric> interesting though. We just got some Samsung SyncMaster 204bs here at work. 20" LCD monitors, nice and bright and crisp. 1600x1200 native resolution, Analog and DVI inputs you can flip between easily. Monitor has a stand (and Windows software) where you can flip the screen 90 degrees to go from wide to tall aspect. It's very nice. I'm thinking of getting some for home at some point, if only because of the space savings on the desks. John

18 years

Re: [Wlug] Meeting topic

by Eric Stein

The stands on the two LCDs are not built for this. It sounds interesting though. Eric Andy Stewart wrote: > At work, we have a few folks with dual LCDs (only 1280x1024 resolution, > though). They have rotated the monitors 90 degrees so they are longer > from top to bottom, and then put the two monitors side by side. This > seemed strange to me at first, but the folks who did it like the > arrangement. > > This was just a thought for your consideration. > > Andy

18 years

WLUG search results for query "meeting"