Search results for "meeting" - WLUG

Re: [Wlug] Using Meetup

by Chuck Anderson

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:09:47AM -0500, Keith Wright wrote: > > From: Henrique <nican(a)WPI.EDU> > > I recommend WLUG also create a meetup group for attracting new > > members. Also Meetup is nice for sending out reminder emails about > > the meetings on the day before. > > WLUG has a mailing list, and I get mail from it regularly. > > It works. > > I am violently, foaming mad, opposed to the idea of > giving that mailing list to any third party. That isn't how meetup works. People who desire to be a part of the meetup group would sign themselves up, just as they sign themselves up for this mailing list. There are no plans to retire this mailing list.

14 years, 1 month

Ubuntu CD's

by Mike Leo

I made the mistake of offering a linux basics class at work. I was going to use the Ubuntu LiveCD to get the class some hands on. This way, they could take the CD and install it if they wanted too. I figured about 5-10 responders would say they wanted to go to the class. So far about 20 people are coming. Anyone have any extra 5.1 Ubuntu CD's they can part with? I need at least 10 more now and don't have time to wait for the mail. I know I could make copies, but talking about the free-ness of it, it would be better to hand them a nice legit copy. If so, please bring them to the LUG meeting tomorow if you can. Thanks... Mike

20 years

Re: [Wlug] Suse Linux Professional 10?

by howard＠howardwhite.net

<<The last Suse Linux software I purchasedfor laptop use was Suse Linux Professional 9.2. Looking now to upgradeto 10. Anyone know the latest Suse release for desktop use? AndI don't think they call it "Suse Linux Professional" anymore. And did Suse ever solve that Yast slowness problem (at least I thinkit was something like that).>> Go here and look at how to install Open SuSe for free. I downloaded it, put it on a DVD, and installed without a hitch. Then look on the OpenSuSe page for the Smart Package Manager (just add /Smart to the url), which is a nice utility for keeping all your apps up-to-date. HW (one of these days I'll actually come to a meeting...)

19 years, 1 month

Re: [Wlug] Converting an iPAQ

by Wesley Allen

On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 14:41, maitre(a)ccs.neu.edu wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:31:27PM -0400, Wesley Allen wrote: > > For the last few months I've been hoping to save up some money and get a > > Zaurus, I don't think that it's going to happen any time soon. So, I've > > got an iPAQ that I can't sync, or even connect, with my linux laptop and > > it's beginning to get on my nerves. So, even though I've got some > > software on my iPAQ that I'll miss (a Bible Reader with the Greek Text > > and SimCity 2000), I'm thinking that it's time to take the plunge and > > get Linux and Qtopia on my 3835. > I would recommend OPIE over Qtopia. Its the fork of Qtopia. It seems to > making very good process. Qtopia has been quiet lately. (lately - meaning > the last 6 months or so) > > Bible Reader - i'm not sure there is an alternate app for that, yet > SimCity 2000 - There's always xbill! I know of an alternative app for a BibleReader, it's the modules I'll miss. What's xbill? > > > > Three Questions, > > 1. Has anyone on the list done this, especially with this model? > i haven't. Mine is a 36xx. But i have gone through the install before. I know the process is the same, so... > > > 2. Has anyone who has done this used any of theKompany's embedded apps? > i have not used theKompany's apps. Which ones were you thinking of > using? Their ogg player for one, and a couple of other things that Shawn Gordon says SHOULD run on an iPAQ. I want tKc to stay in business, so I don't mind paying some money, for stuff like that. I like their Calendar better than Qtopia's or Opie's for example. Though Opie's got the "today" screen, great touch! Will qtopia apps run in Opie, how "forked" is it? > > > 3. Is there anyone willing to help me do this face to face? I could do > > this on my own, but the idea of potentially owning a $599 paperweight > > dims my enthusiasm when I think of going it alone. (I'll buy the > > coffee) > Perhaps, i don't know if i can make it to the next meeting or not. I > will be in boston that day. It's hard to say at this point whether i > can be back in time. Actually, I was thinking of just setting up shop in a local coffee house with laptop, iPAQ, and mug. How long does the install take? It might make a good meeting topic though, an "embedded linux installfest!" (Imagine trying THAT outside a bestbuy! Wes > > Are there other people that want to try this? Or watch this? > > --brad > > WARNING: This email has not been spell checked. > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > --

23 years, 7 months

LTSP training video online

by Andy Stewart

HI everybody, This link might prove interesting for folks with very fast Internet connections: http://www.lpbn.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=50&mo… If that doesn't work, try this: http://www.lpbn.org Click "The Mandrake Hour" (left side) Click the second video "The Linux Terminal Server Installation" It works for me with the Linux verison of RealPlay. I remember a brain storming session many of us had in the WPI Library parking lot after a WLUG meeting where we thought about making Linux training videos. We'll, somebody is doing it! On the Linux Public Broadcasting Network, there are many other videos. Check them out: http://www.lpbn.org Andy -- Andy Stewart, Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group Worcester, MA USA http://www.wlug.org

22 years, 8 months

Re: [Wlug] code review / process flow tool?

by Karl Hiramoto

I recently started using Trac http://www.edgewall.com/trac/ with a subversion code repository. Not sure if it meets your needs, or if you can adapt to work with it. Bill Mills-Curran wrote: >My org at work would like to adopt some software tools to manage the >code review/approval work cycle. A web-based interface is our first >choice. We have both linux and windows web servers available. > >Any recommendations for existing tools? (We could write our own, but >that seems like a waste of time.) > >Thanks, >Bill >_______________________________________________ >Wlug mailing list >Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > > > -- -- Karl Hiramoto karl(a)accusense.com Design Engineer www.accusense.com 978-425-2090

20 years, 5 months

RE: [Wlug] LTSP as a means of recycling old PCs...

by Martin, Eric

Any body else have a problem getting to the article? Eric *********************** There's a post on Slashdot talking about LTSP... (Yeah, I posted it... <g>) The link is http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/22/223425&&mode=thread&tid=126&tid= 137&tid=163&tid=187 There's one comment that really drives the point home: #9227112 ... Anyway, I know that there was a recent WLUG meeting about LTSP, so I thought this might be of interest. -- William Smith wsmith(a)chezsmith.com Fall River, MA -----Original Message----- From: Bill Smith [mailto:wsmith@chezsmith.com] Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 8:22 PM To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org Subject: [Wlug] LTSP as a means of recycling old PCs... _______________________________________________ Wlug mailing list Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

21 years, 11 months

WLUG Meeting Feb 11th 2021! Topic: Good question!

by Chuck Anderson

Correct, Keith's server is not configured to current best security practices. His server has what is called "upward referrals" turned on. https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/articles/upward-referrals-considered-harmful I believe what you want at a minimum is: additional-from-cache no; Also, it sounds like you are using your DNS server for two functions: caching for internal clients, and authoritative for your domain name(s). If so you probably should isolate both functions: "If your nameserver is both authoritative and caching, you really should separate the two functions. Caching nameservers are susceptible to poisoning and other types of attacks. You don't necessarily need separate hardware for each. You might need to use separate IP addresses, or possibly configure the authoritative nameserver to use an external address while the caching nameserver uses an internal address." See also: https://kb.isc.org/docs/bind-best-practices-authoritative and: https://kb.isc.org/docs/bind-best-practices-recursive On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:08:21AM -0500, Robert N. Evans via WLUG wrote: > That is not what I see when I query one of the major name servers. I would guess your server is configured differently... > > rne@P5:~$ dig @1.1.1.1 isc.org > > ; <<>> DiG 9.16.1-Ubuntu <<>> @1.1.1.1 isc.org > ; (1 server found) > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 31866 > ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;isc.org. IN A > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > isc.org. 9 IN A 149.20.1.66 > > ;; Query time: 24 msec > ;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) > ;; WHEN: Thu Feb 11 10:03:30 EST 2021 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 52 > > > -BE > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Keith Wright via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> > >Sent: Feb 11, 2021 1:04 AM > >To: Worcester Linux Users' Group General Discussion <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> > >Cc: wlug(a)lists.wlug.org, Andre.Lehovich(a)gmx.com, Keith Wright <kwright(a)keithdiane.us> > >Subject: [WLUG] Re: WLUG Meeting Feb 11th 2021! Topic: Good question! > > > >Andre Lehovich via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> writes: > > > >>> dig @66.92.74.188 isc.org > >> > >> Here you go, hope it's useful... > > > >Thank you. That's a lot of information. > > > >> quetzal:~ al$ dig @66.92.74.188 isc.org > >> > >> ; <<>> DiG 9.10.6 <<>> @66.92.74.188 isc.org > >> ; (1 server found) > >> ;; global options: +cmd > >> ;; Got answer: > >> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 11995 > >> ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 27 > >> ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available > > ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ > >That looks good. > >I don't want to be doing recursion for you (nothing personal). > > > >But where did all the rest of that come from? > >I've never seen anything like that! > >Did my server send all that? Why?? > > > >> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > >> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 > >> ;; QUESTION SECTION: > >> ;isc.org. IN A > >> > >> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > >> . 348191 IN NS c.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS d.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS e.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS f.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS g.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS h.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS i.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS j.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS k.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS l.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS m.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS a.root-servers.net. > >> . 348191 IN NS b.root-servers.net. > >> > >> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > >> a.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 198.41.0.4 > >> a.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:503:ba3e::2:30 > >> b.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 199.9.14.201 > >> b.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:500:200::b > >> c.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 192.33.4.12 > >> c.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:500:2::c > >> d.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 199.7.91.13 > >> d.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:500:2d::d > >> e.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 192.203.230.10 > >> e.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:500:a8::e > >> f.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 192.5.5.241 > >> f.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:500:2f::f > >> g.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 192.112.36.4 > >> g.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:500:12::d0d > >> h.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 198.97.190.53 > >> h.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:500:1::53 > >> i.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 192.36.148.17 > >> i.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:7fe::53 > >> j.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 192.58.128.30 > >> j.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:503:c27::2:30 > >> k.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 193.0.14.129 > >> k.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:7fd::1 > >> l.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 199.7.83.42 > >> l.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:500:9f::42 > >> m.root-servers.net. 348191 IN A 202.12.27.33 > >> m.root-servers.net. 348191 IN AAAA 2001:dc3::35 > >> > >> ;; Query time: 150 msec > >> ;; SERVER: 66.92.74.188#53(66.92.74.188) > >> ;; WHEN: Wed Feb 10 20:31:08 PST 2021 > >> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 819

5 years, 2 months

VNC performance

by Brad Noyes

Hi All, I remember some time ago talking with Andy, and others about VNC performance at a wlug meeting. I remember that setting the depth 8 will help performance, as well as disabling the wallpaper. I am running the server on windows, and the client on a linux machine. VNC's site has info for disabling wallpaper, but it seems to involve editing a registry file. When i try to do so, i get an access denied message, because that file is read only. Can someone help me out here? I really know very little about windows. On the client side, the option '-depth 8' doesn't seem to do very much i get '16 bits per pixel'. If anyone knows of any other methods for speeding up VNC, please post. Thanks, --Brad

24 years, 5 months

RE: [Wlug] BBC cd

by Skip Gaede

Doug Waud wrote: > > Hi all > > A few meeting back, Andy gave out some BBC-Linux cd's. I decided to > try one and got hung up. > If you want to be adventuresome, check out http://sorcerer.wox.org Tou can download an 80 MB bzipped iso image, which will get you up and running with only a kernel compile. After that you can install anything you like. At last count, they had between 700 and 800 packages you could install. Iy's dependency based, so if you say you want to install kde, it will install X and a bunch of other stuff so you can run kde. You still need to know a bit about what you're doing, but it's a very promising distro. --Skip

24 years, 3 months

WLUG search results for query "meeting"