Search results for "meeting" - WLUG

Re: Next month meeting date, some input needed.

by John Stoffel

>>>>> "Frank" == Frank Sweetser via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> writes: > The 22nd would work for me. Sounds like the 22nd is the "good enough" date for people. Now for a topic! Can we get a talk on the web browser being developed for the new non-linux system? I totally am blanking on the name(s) right now, but we've mentioned it at the past few meetings. I'll try to bring my new tiny little desktop. The only gotcha is that it depends on my home NFS server for NFS home directories and LDAP for authentication. Which leads to another topic... keeping home directories in sync when you have laptops, home servers, remote systems, etc. How do people keep their setups consistent? I came from an era of Xterms and DEC workstations where all home and tool directories were on NFS servers, and the systems were very light on anything but enough to boot the OS. This way people could sit down at any system, login and their environment was just there. Now with everyone having laptops, I think most colleges have gone away from big computer labs any more. But keeping your files safe is tough. iCloud, OneDrive, rsync, etc have helped, but I'm not sure what the real answer is here. This could be an interesting topic! John

6 months

Re: [Wlug] Next WLUG Meeting: Keysigning Party 9/11/2013

by Eric Martin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi All, I forgot to mention that you should print out your fingerprint and bring it to the meeting, to make sure that the one I have on file for you is the correct one. If you aren't able to pre-register, print out 15 copies or so to hand out to people at the meeting. You can get the fingerprint by typing gpg --list-secret-keys | grep ^sec For me, this is 146797fa. Yours will be different. gpg --fingerprint KEYID I'm looking forward to seeing everybody there. We'll have a short talk on the how and why of PGP, then we'll adjourn to Tech Pizza for dinner. On 9/11/13 10:37 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Now is a good time to check if your key is expired and/or is using a > weak algorithm or key size, and generate a new key if necessary. > > I followed the steps here to start a transition from an ancient 1024D > (DSA 1024-bit) key to a modern 4096R (RSA 4096-bit) key: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/key-transition.html > > See you all tonight! > > On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 10:48:00PM -0400, Eric Martin wrote: >> Just a reminder that this week I'll be giving a talk on PGP and running a >> key signing. Please upload your public key to the keyring before the >> meeting to register for the key signing. It is possible to participate >> without registering but it's a lot easier if you register. >> >> Please don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions. >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Eric Martin >> <eric.joshua.martin(a)gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> > On Wednesday, September 11th 2013 I'll be running a PGP Key Signing > party. PGP stands for Pretty Good Privacy and was developed by Phil > Zimmerman in 1991 for secure communications. Signing keys allows you to > say that you trust somebody's key, and extends the Web of Trust which > helps everybody. > > To participate, please bring your public key's fingerprint, and at least > (2) forms of ID (Government issued photo ID is the best way to go). If > you don't yet have a public key, follow the directions for 'Preparing > for the Party' from this [1] Key Signing Party HOWTO. > > Additionally, please upload your public key to our keyring for this > event here [2]. I'll give a brief talk on PGP, and then we'll go > through everybody's keys. > > What not to bring: A computer. Keys are signed at home, we just verify > them at the Key Signing. > > [1] > > http://www.cryptnet.net/fdp/crypto/keysigning_party/en/keysigning_party.htm… > [2] http://biglumber.com/x/web?keyring=4480 > >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wlug mailing list >>> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >>> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug - -- Eric Martin Key Fingerprint = C74F 1EBF 2E80 7984 8CB5 064E BF17 D34C C704 B30F -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSMNizAAoJEL8X00zHBLMPCk4QAKLjQJSh4giYnOsCUGsuJuV9 /NzBkG701IJACLFBNeehMB/6jFYk6sNKCYRPSFVMOh2aHogndr+OhHPujAR7mGOv yShdjDvSNGGNfI4gXcxBvz3+0Hol20DEMQbOaN6WcrLiUG8j5ma5a//V/3+CVCEk SgYhCg6r1v71Zq+CfpcDoByX8SRHmfp2/48zEUlDv9JCpuE/X9x33L0mhN1wYlGY zp/jZT3tXVdgkAz/pCLyScq4cMLagj8IkrzlCMT9vd313WVQ/lRm05QKFVlR67XM 9mn0poXP7E04Tl3Z4q8fgO6wM8wdVG4r6cYCUuICysNjhU773JoY7PyxOLmgXggB BEWlJD6TD/hPFmFVM6T+JoCyDSsh3bEnpefehbW12PXKxPuArLZ5xXF1JHHe3hFb YcH/9aT+xWWyIUxRfEj1GBbIGDESo9KRmmSiuo0EBFYVSNYtyaEFqoAUsqFS7BmS acQ/x3Tn7uidOT1IwXJqX9BBSpFJlzqMleLIDjcPezuzr04f3OVqGsZdjJ8iS3M5 cV2P6fdJroJRp9WpaCBkrK2U3rLpqSwTZzn/RylCR9BWSP2nNrEButp62+uwAc3I 69HQAcrpu/DqjP9yVrADe1dnnRKD4s1+lusr23QXETqXEJ0mJHQ4LlJGc/yH/DPu WePyoSrB+xHgsKj8i/Lv =n+42 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

12 years, 1 month

Re: [Wlug] Meeting topics

by Jeff Moyer

Frank Sweetser <fs(a)WPI.EDU> writes: > I've noticed that not too many people have putting in meeting topic requests, > so I thought that if anyone's interested I'd volunteer to throw together some > slides on BtrFS. > > For those of you who haven't heard of it, BtrFS is the next generation linux > filesystem. Though still in heavy development, it was included in the > mainstream kernel last year. It promises to scale to filesystems well beyond > what any of the current offerings can handle (including ext4), as well as > offering far greater flexibility and better data security for data admins. > > If you have anything else that you'd like to hear about, either instead of or > in addition to BtrFS, chime in, and hopefully someone else on the list will be > able to make it happen! If anyone is interested in a talk on SSDs, chime in. I can present my experiences with these devices. I've evaluated the performance of several vendors' products, ranging from the poor to the exemplary. I can talk about the modifications made in the block layer to accommodate for these devices, and the current implementation of the block discard support (which maps to ATA TRIM, which is important for device lognevity and performance) and how that is wired up to file systems such as ext4. Cheers, Jeff

15 years, 8 months

Re: [Wlug] another vote for a future meeting topic

by Brian Waite

On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:13:32 -0400, Mike Frysinger <vapier(a)gentoo.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 01 September 2004 08:54 am, Brian Waite wrote: > > I could get into this type of meeting. In fact, watching the time it > > takes to do a Gentoo install > > if you know the internals of the build process you can trick the whole > proccess to use just binary packages (assuming of course you have the binary > packages) That might be a good solution for the time constrained. Maybe at the time we do a Binary Gentoo install and then go into detail about how to emerge and build the apps at a later date. That might actually get me to use Gentoo again. If I can have a fully configured system in a short amount of time, I can setup cron jobs to build optimized versions at night. > > > Also, can the gentoo build work via distcc? I looked deeper into the Gentoo distcc build and it looks like it might not be very easy. They require (correctly) a hardened version of the compiler if I under stood corretly and trying to ensure N machines with M distors have the right compilers would be unreallistic. > > yes > -mike > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

21 years, 2 months

Ideas for the next WLUG meeting

by Joshua Stone

Hey everyone, I'd just like to say I had a fun time at Thursday's meeting! I'm already looking forward to the next meeting as I'm sure there are plenty of interesting topics we could discuss. As mentioned before, I think we could examine technologies that'd be beneficial to Linux on the desktop, like comparing packaging technologies including Flatpak, Snap, and AppImage. I think we could also look into the future of containers on the desktop as a whole with projects like Flatpak, toolbox, podman, and Silverblue. My workflow over the past few years has been using these upcoming technologies as daily drivers as they lead to saner development. For example, my laptop runs Silverblue ( https://fedoramagazine.org/what-is-silverblue/) which is a Fedora variant designed around immutability where a new system image is committed as the new /sysroot without affecting the state of the running system. This is reminiscent of Android A/B updates, although the update backend -- ostree -- has elements of a version control system like git. Toolbox ( https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/toolbox/) is also interesting as it lets you switch into an unprivileged development environment that can be built up and torn down without affecting the host as tools are installed inside a container. For example, I can build and install duc inside a toolbox without actually installing to the host /usr: [jstone@jstone-laptop ~]$ toolbox create --release 31 --container duc- test [jstone@jstone-laptop ~]$ toolbox enter --container duc-test ⬢[jstone@toolbox ~]$ git clone https://github.com/zevv/duc ⬢[jstone@toolbox ~]$ cd duc ⬢[jstone@toolbox duc]$ sudo dnf --assumeyes install gcc make autoconf automake pango-devel cairo-devel tokyocabinet-devel ncurses-devel ⬢[jstone@toolbox duc]$ autoreconf --install ⬢[jstone@toolbox duc]$ ./configure ⬢[jstone@toolbox duc]$ make ⬢[jstone@toolbox duc]$ sudo make install # no password needed ⬢[jstone@toolbox duc]$ mkdir ~/.cache/duc ⬢[jstone@toolbox duc]$ tcbmgr create ~/.cache/duc/duc.db ⬢[jstone@toolbox duc]$ duc index ~ ⬢[jstone@toolbox duc]$ duc gui Finally, I've been installing most of my apps as Flatpaks, which uses the same file storage backend as Silverblue to manage apps and shared runtimes. This app distribution technology allows you to decouple apps and operating systems as everything is built and run inside a sandbox, making upgrades easier. Compare needing only one version of an app to package as a flatpak, versus packaging for different versions of distros: https://flathub.org/apps/details/org.clementine_player.Clementine https://www.clementine-player.org/downloads I'd be glad to hear what everyone has to say! -Josh

5 years, 11 months

Re: [Wlug] Re: ipaq

by Wes Allen

Is this an embedded device? What ports? Would it make a good firewall? Wes On Thursday 12 December 2002 1:56 pm, Dean M. Deaver wrote: > > Message: 1 > > From: brad <maitre(a)ccs.neu.edu> > > To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > Subject: Re: [Wlug] Meeting Ideas... > > Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:12:40 -0500 > > charset="iso-8859-1" > > Reply-To: wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > > > > A meeting like so would probably be best suited for January. That would > > give me time to get kitchsync working. Also i hope i can i have a ipaq to > > install linux on (mine has already been ..... well, exorcized). Wes has > > been wanting to do for some time, let's hope he can make it January's > > meeting. > > > > Are there any other ipaq owners which would like to have this done? > > Speaking of ipaq, I have a 'Shark' Network Appliance that is now > gathering dust in my attic as I no longer have the time to fiddle > with it. Basically, it's a StrongARM SA-110 based device as > described on handhelds.org / platforms . Might be useful for > ipaq development. It's up for grabs, for free. Reply if you > want it. If I get more than one reply within the next week > (i.e. by noon next Thursday), the giveaway will be done by some > form of lottery (or it could be done by meeting raffle > if wlug still has those). > > Disclaimer: The last time I tried -- ~ 2 years ago -- it would boot > linux via bootp. I also had something of a useful distro (?) > "installed", with binaries cribbed from a mix of stuff from > handhelds.org and netwinder rpms. But it will probably take some > doing to get it up and running since I have no documentation for the > current firmware; and, the last time I checked, I wasn't greeted by > a 'may I help you' prompt upon powering it up. [I would power it up > now but I cannot find the power supply :) ] > > > ...Dean > > > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug -- ------ This message may be signed using GPG, for my public key please send me a message with "Key Request" in the subject line.

22 years, 10 months

Re: [Wlug] Pre-Registration: WLUG Keysigning, Wenesday April 22nd

by Andy Stewart

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chuck Anderson wrote: > Last call on Pre-Registration. At 3:30pm I'll generate the final list > of pre-registered fingerprints. > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:59:39PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: >> I've put together a web page describing the procedure for >> Pre-Registering for the Keysigning to be held at our next WLUG >> meeting. This is also linked from the WLUG front page: >> >> http://www.wlug.org/keysigning/ >> >> If you wish to participate, please check it over as there are a few >> steps you need to perform before arriving at the meeting. >> >> Thanks, >> Chuck > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug > HI guys, I was expecting to see my name in the wlug-keysigning-fingerprints.txt since I had (I thought) followed the instructions several days ago. Alas, my name/info is not present in the file. :-( I'll follow the rest of the instructions, and I'll see you at the meeting. Andy - -- Andy Stewart, Founder Worcester Linux Users' Group (http://www.wlug.org) Chelmsford Linux Meetup Group (http://linux.meetup.com/393) Amateur Radio: KB1OIQ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ745AHl0iXDssISsRAkDvAJ4zvOwLPxPk+xKbFWfNHVKR+LNSUQCcDkym luJjbo5xsgLXb7RXo5Nudc0= =FCfe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

16 years, 6 months

Re: [Wlug] Wlug Meeting March 15th, 2018

by Tim Keller

Come on down, we're running late. On Thursday, March 15, 2018, Richard Klein <rich(a)richardklein.org> wrote: > How late do you think the talk and demo will go? I'm still a few minutes away from leaving work in Billerica, so I probably won't get there 'til after 8. > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Tim Keller <turbofx(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Our next wlug meeting will be March 15th, 2018 @7pm. >> The location will be our usual haunt: WPI Mid Century Room Rm 331. >> Topic: LUKS (Linux Unified Key Setup) >> LUKS is a system for setting up encrypted disks on linux. I'll give a talk and a demo. >> By all means, if this is something you're actively using, feel free to chime in with your experiences both positive and negative. >> As usual, snacks and refreshments will be provided and then we'll head off for burgers or pizza and continue the conversation! >> Thanks, >> Tim. >> >> -- >> I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers". >> _______________________________________________ >> Wlug mailing list >> Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org >> http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >> > > -- I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

7 years, 7 months

Re: April WLUG meeting to be online

by Jon "maddog" Hall

I would be happy to attend for a jitsi meetup. I might even be willing to give a lecture about why I welcome Fedora to be on Lenovo laptops. md On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:35 AM Tim Keller via WLUG <wlug(a)lists.wlug.org> wrote: > Hey Gang, > > I hope everybody is staying safe and healthy. While Linux doesn't need > virus protection, we do. Wash your hands you filthy animals. > > As the subject reads, we're going to be doing the WLUG meeting online. > I've been active in the wlug-ma irc channel as have others. > > What do people think about Jitsi for doing a video meetup? > > Refreshments will not be provided and we won't be going out for dinner!! > > Stay home, stay safe and I hope we'll all get to see each other soon. > > Later, > Tim. > > > -- > I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their > constituents as "consumers". > _______________________________________________ > WLUG mailing list -- wlug(a)lists.wlug.org > To unsubscribe send an email to wlug-leave(a)lists.wlug.org > Create Account: https://wlug.mailman3.com/accounts/signup/ > Change Settings: > https://wlug.mailman3.com/postorius/lists/wlug.lists.wlug.org/ > Web Forum/Archive: > https://wlug.mailman3.com/hyperkitty/list/wlug@lists.wlug.org/message/LNHAH… >

5 years, 6 months

Re: [Wlug] Announce: WLUG Meeting Wed 10/9 7PM Jim Gettys on Internet buffer bloat

by Caleb Stepanian

I plan to attend. On 2 October 2013 18:07, Chuck Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> wrote: > I'd like to gauge how many people plan to go to this meeting, since it > could be popular enough that I might need to get a bigger room. If > people plan to attend, could they chime in? > > Thanks, > Chuck > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:01:41AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > The next Worcester Linux Users' Group (WLUG) meeting will be held at > > its regularly scheduled time: the 2nd Wednesday of the month, which is > > Wednesday, October 9, at 7PM. The location will be the WPI Campus > > Center, Mid-Centry Room 331. > > > > This month we will have Jim Gettys from Bell Labs talk about Internet > > buffer bloat. This is the talk that has been rescheduled from April. > > > > "Internet buffer bloat, by Jim Gettys (Bell Labs) > > > > VOIP and teleconferencing often perform much more poorly on today's > > Internet than the Internet of a decade ago, despite great gains in > > bandwidth. Lots of fiber, cheap memory, smart hardware, variability of > > wireless goodput, changes in web browser behaviour, changes in TCP > > implementations, and a focus on benchmarking Internet performance > > solely by bandwidth, and engineer's natural reluctance to drop packets > > have conspired to encourage papering over problems by adding buffers; > > each of which may introduce latency when filled. > > > > The mistaken quest to never drop packets has destroyed interactivity > > under load, and often results in actual higher packet loss, as TCP's > > congestion avoidance algorithms have been defeated by these > > buffers. The lessons of the "RED manifesto" of 1997 have been > > forgotten or never learned by a new generation of engineers." > > > > Wednesday, October 9, 7:00 - 9:00 PM > > WPI Campus Center, Mid-Centry Room 331 > > > > Afterwards, we will go out for pizza. > > > > See you there, > > Chuck > > President, Worcester Linux Users' Group > > http://www.wlug.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Wlug mailing list > Wlug(a)mail.wlug.org > http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug >

12 years, 1 month

WLUG search results for query "meeting"