Interesting but I don't see much point. Yes it may be technically interesting but from an end user perspective why use this over cygwin. I imagine any graphical application won't work. If they did make it support SDL, gtk, etc., I'd be interested. Granted on a new machine I might install it instead of cygwin if it was easier to install. On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 15:49 -0400, Tim Keller wrote:

https://insights.ubuntu.com/2016/03/30/ubuntu-on-windows-the-ubuntu-u serspace-for-windows-developers/

They've written a wrapper that converts linux syscalls to windows syscalls...

Native bash, rsync, etc... without cygwin.

Well, this will make backing up my wife's machine a bit easier now that it'll be running sshd.

Tim.

--  I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers". _______________________________________________ Wlug mailing list Wlug@mail.wlug.org http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug