There was much debate over why it was called 9.0 and not just 8.1. In my opinion after having used it for a day now, there was no need for it to be 9.0, it could have easily been 8.1. However some useful documents are on the redhat website as to why its 9.0 and not 8.1. Nothing really was that convincing though. Chuck ==================================== Chuck Haines chaines@wpi.edu http://www.linux-xtreme.net ==================================== WPI ECE Systems Administrator WPI Game Development Club Developer WPI Linux Association Lab Manager Tau Kappa Epsilon Fraternity TKE-IT Systems Administrator ==================================== AIM: CyberGrex YIM: CyberGrex_27 ICQ: 3707881 ==================================== Sean said:
At 03:04 PM 4/1/2003 , you wrote:
I agree that bigger numbers are more impressive when the number is between 0 and 10 but what will happen after 10? 12 does not seem that impressive to me... 19? 34? may be 99? :)
baris
I think that if the next number is not cool enough, the default is to use the year. Luckily, now that we are into the 2k century, every year sounds cool.
aka: Linux 2k5!!!
Cheers, Sean
_______________________________________________ Wlug mailing list Wlug@mail.wlug.org http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug