10 Aug
2006
10 Aug
'06
6:36 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:11:15PM -0400, Tim Keller wrote:
What do people recommend as tuning parameters and/or fs types for creating filesystems that have the potential to store massive ammounts of relatively small files?
Would I have been better suited to have this thing formatted with ReiserFS?
I prefer XFS in general, which in this case has no set inode number limitation. I've been burned numerous times by ReiserFS in the past, whereas I haven't had any major XFS issues that I can recall. fwiw. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Veni, Vidi, Vice" - I came, I saw, I partied.