Thanks!

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Tim Keller <turbofx@gmail.com> wrote:
The meeting is Thursday, Dec 11th 2014.  There is no meeting tonight... Sorry for the confusion.

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Richard Klein <rich@richardklein.org> wrote:
It's in my calendar for Wednesday, tonight.  Is it really Thursday?

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Tim Keller <turbofx@gmail.com> wrote:
This is all on me, I got my dates turned around and sent out the wrong email.  Sorry for any confusion that I may have caused.

Thanks,
Tim.

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:07 AM, James Gray <jamespgray@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Keith,  I had figured you were being sarcastic in your prior e-mail. I'm not entirely sure you aren't now.  I concluded that the meeting was on Thursday.  At one point Tim indicated Wednesday, but corrected himself that it was Thursday in another email. Chuck also indicated Thursday in the most recent email, so the question seemed settled to me. 

I find email subject lines to be often misleading just like the titles of news articles. Subject lines always seem to get out of date as the conversion evolves.

thanks!

On Dec 10, 2014 12:07 AM, "Keith Wright" <kwright@keithdiane.us> wrote:
Keith Wright <kwright@keithdiane.us> writes:

> Tim Keller <turbofx@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Yup, I screwed up.  I reposted a correct reminder.
>
> I don't care _who_ screwed up.

But I do care _which_ was screwed up.

I had decided to go on Wednesday, until I re-reviewed
my email inbox.

There are five messages in there that say "Wednesday"
in the subject, including this:

> Yup, I totally screwed up...
> The meeting is on the 10th NOT the 11th!!!

Nevertheless, I now think maybe Thursday is correct,
because there is one message that says:

> The meeting is Thursday,
> December 11th @7pm in the usual place.

I was hoping that my previous message would result
in a definitive answer, but nothing came all day.

Maybe it seems redundant, but make it two out of three
and tell me again, please.

It would help if the Web page were updated to mention
Jon Hall, so it doesn't look like dead information
forgotten since last year.

  -- Keith
_______________________________________________
Wlug mailing list
Wlug@mail.wlug.org
http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug

_______________________________________________
Wlug mailing list
Wlug@mail.wlug.org
http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug




--
I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

_______________________________________________
Wlug mailing list
Wlug@mail.wlug.org
http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug



_______________________________________________
Wlug mailing list
Wlug@mail.wlug.org
http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug




--
I am leery of the allegiances of any politician who refers to their constituents as "consumers".

_______________________________________________
Wlug mailing list
Wlug@mail.wlug.org
http://mail.wlug.org/mailman/listinfo/wlug